ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain (qlcsection)

May 3, 2024 updated by: Nicholas Schott

QL Block for Post-cesarean Delivery Pain

Comparison of standard post-operative cesarean surgery pain management with regional post-op pain control.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this trial is to determine the efficacy of a postoperative analgesia strategy that incorporates quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in conjunction with a multi-modal post-cesarean analgesia strategy. The investigators hypothesize that QLB will provide superior post-cesarean analgesia compared to the current standard of care, multi-modal analgesia.

Thus, analgesia following cesarean section using QLB compared to the current standard of care alone will be further investigated. Current practice for cesarean surgical intervention consists of multi-modal analgesia (i.e., Intrathecal morphine (ITM) and scheduled post-operative non-opioid oral analgesics, with oral opioid analgesics reserved for breakthrough pain).

Investigators will measure side-effects associated with each strategy: Standard of care methods consisting of intrathecal morphine (ITM) plus scheduled non-opioid analgesics in conjunction with prn opioid analgesics for breakthrough pain will be utilized for both. The experimental treatment arm will entail standard of care in addition to QLB. The sham comparator will entail standard of care in addition to QLB with saline.

For each strategy, we will measure and model associated economic ramifications; such factors will include drug costs, procedure costs, and costs associated with length of stay and re-admissions.

The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is similar to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, but differs slightly in regards to the anatomical region where local anesthetic is injected. Since the quadratus lumborum (QL) is more posteriorly located, it theoretically confers greater safety due to enhanced visualization. The TAP block has been studied extensively for post-cesarean delivery pain, consistently showing that it is not superior to ITM for post-operative analgesia; however, it may prove to be helpful in patients with breakthrough pain despite the use of ITM, or in patients who were unable to receive ITM (e.g. general anesthesia for cesarean, contraindications to neuraxial morphine). Thus, ITM is superior to TAP alone for post-cesarean analgesia, but it is associated with a dose-dependent increased risk for opioid related side effects. In 2015, Blanco et. al. published a study specifically using the QLB for postoperative pain after cesarean delivery. In this study, they compared a true QLB to a sham QLB all in patients who did not receive ITM, and found that the QLB provided improved pain control and decreased the need for post-operative opioids. Another study in 2016 demonstrated that the QLB is superior to the TAP block in regards to decreasing post-operative pain following c-section. Unfortunately, neither study compared the QLB to ITM (part of the current gold standard for post-cesarean delivery pain, multimodal analgesia).

The gap in knowledge regarding the utility of QLB as part of a multimodal analgesic approach including ITM for cesarean section warrants further investigation. Clinicians are constantly searching for methods to provide patients with the most effective medical interventions that provide maximal benefit and minimal harm. Post-operative pain control following cesarean delivery is an area that is important to patients and to providers, and the introduction of the QLB for this purpose has the potential to improve analgesic benefit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Magee Women's Hospital of UPMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective cesarean planned under spinal anesthesia
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score of 2 (or less)
  • Gestational age of at least 37 weeks
  • Intention to breastfeed infant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to neuraxial blockade (such as clinically relevant coagulopathy, recent anticoagulant use, patient refusal, or localized skin infection overlying the site of needle entry)
  • Anatomical abnormalities contraindicating spinal or QLB placement
  • Received/Conversion to general anesthesia
  • Received supplemental parenteral anesthesia (sedation) for any reason (e.g. unanticipated prolonged surgical procedure)
  • History of chronic pain
  • History of chronic opioid use/abuse
  • History of Subutex, methadone, other maintenance therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: ITM + Sham QLB
Standard spinal with intrathecal morphine for surgical anesthetic with sham saline block. Saline will be administered as a quadratus lumborum block prior to cesarean section.
Sham subcutaneous non-anesthetic infiltration with saline
Other Names:
  • Saline
Experimental: ITM + Bupivacaine QLB
Standard spinal with intrathecal morphine for surgical anesthetic with ql block with bupivacaine local anesthetic. Interventional drug will be administered prior to cesarean section.
QL plane block with local anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score With Movement
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgical procedure (cesarean delivery)
Post-operative pain accompanied with patient movement will be measured using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
24 hours after surgical procedure (cesarean delivery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breast Feeding Success/Quality
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operatively
Limited breastfeeding resulting from pain or opioid side effects
24-hours post-operatively
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 1 hour after intervention
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
1 hour after intervention
First Request for Pain Medication
Time Frame: From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from the study or requests analgesic medication up until 72 hours
Time to first opioid dose (measured in hours)
From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from the study or requests analgesic medication up until 72 hours
Sedation
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
Presence or absence will be noted. Will be measured via Ramsay Sedation Score which ranges on a scale of 1 to 6 as follows: 1-patient is anxious, agitated, or restless. 2-patient is co-operative and oriented. 3-patient responds to commands only. 4-patient exhibits brisk response to light stimuli or loud auditory stimuli. 5-patient exhibits sluggish response to light or auditory stimuli. 6-patient exhibits no response.
24-hours post-operative
Pruritis
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3). 0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching
4-hours post-operative
Nausea/Vomiting
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment
4-hours post-operative
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
4-hours post-operative
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff
4-hours post-operative
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
Will be measured in % per standard of care and documented by study staff
4-hours post-operative
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 4 hours after intervention
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
4 hours after intervention
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
24 hours after intervention
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 48 hours after intervention
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS). The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
48 hours after intervention
Pruritis
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3). 0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching
24-hours post-operative
Pruritis
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3). 0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching
48-hours post-operative
Nausea/Vomiting
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment
24-hours post-operative
Nausea/Vomiting
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment
48-hours post-operative
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
Standard heart rate obtained
4-hours post-operative
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
Standard heart rate obtained
24-hours post-operative
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
Standard heart rate obtained
48-hours post-operative
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
24-hours post-operative
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
48-hours post-operative
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
4-hours post-operative
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
24-hours post-operative
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
48-hours post-operative
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff
24-hours post-operative
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff
48-hours post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Amy Monroe, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plans to share

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on ITM + Sham QLB

Subscribe