ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain (qlcsection)

June 2, 2022 updated by: Nicholas Schott

QL Block for Post-cesarean Delivery Pain

Comparison of standard post-operative cesarean surgery pain management with regional post-op pain control.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this trial is to determine the efficacy of a postoperative analgesia strategy that incorporates quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in conjunction with a multi-modal post-cesarean analgesia strategy. The investigators hypothesize that QLB will provide superior post-cesarean analgesia compared to the current standard of care, multi-modal analgesia.

Thus, analgesia following cesarean section using QLB compared to the current standard of care alone will be further investigated. Current practice for cesarean surgical intervention consists of multi-modal analgesia (i.e., Intrathecal morphine (ITM) and scheduled post-operative non-opioid oral analgesics, with oral opioid analgesics reserved for breakthrough pain).

Investigators will measure side-effects associated with each strategy: Standard of care methods consisting of intrathecal morphine (ITM) plus scheduled non-opioid analgesics in conjunction with prn opioid analgesics for breakthrough pain will be utilized for both. The experimental treatment arm will entail standard of care in addition to QLB. The sham comparator will entail standard of care in addition to QLB with saline.

For each strategy, we will measure and model associated economic ramifications; such factors will include drug costs, procedure costs, and costs associated with length of stay and re-admissions.

The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is similar to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, but differs slightly in regards to the anatomical region where local anesthetic is injected. Since the quadratus lumborum (QL) is more posteriorly located, it theoretically confers greater safety due to enhanced visualization. The TAP block has been studied extensively for post-cesarean delivery pain, consistently showing that it is not superior to ITM for post-operative analgesia; however, it may prove to be helpful in patients with breakthrough pain despite the use of ITM, or in patients who were unable to receive ITM (e.g. general anesthesia for cesarean, contraindications to neuraxial morphine). Thus, ITM is superior to TAP alone for post-cesarean analgesia, but it is associated with a dose-dependent increased risk for opioid related side effects. In 2015, Blanco et. al. published a study specifically using the QLB for postoperative pain after cesarean delivery. In this study, they compared a true QLB to a sham QLB all in patients who did not receive ITM, and found that the QLB provided improved pain control and decreased the need for post-operative opioids. Another study in 2016 demonstrated that the QLB is superior to the TAP block in regards to decreasing post-operative pain following c-section. Unfortunately, neither study compared the QLB to ITM (part of the current gold standard for post-cesarean delivery pain, multimodal analgesia).

The gap in knowledge regarding the utility of QLB as part of a multimodal analgesic approach including ITM for cesarean section warrants further investigation. Clinicians are constantly searching for methods to provide patients with the most effective medical interventions that provide maximal benefit and minimal harm. Post-operative pain control following cesarean delivery is an area that is important to patients and to providers, and the introduction of the QLB for this purpose has the potential to improve analgesic benefit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Recruiting
        • Magee Women's Hospital of UPMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective cesarean planned under spinal anesthesia
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score of 2 (or less)
  • Gestational age of at least 37 weeks
  • Intention to breastfeed infant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to neuraxial blockade (such as clinically relevant coagulopathy, recent anticoagulant use, patient refusal, or localized skin infection overlying the site of needle entry)
  • Anatomical abnormalities contraindicating spinal or QLB placement
  • Received/Conversion to general anesthesia
  • Received supplemental parenteral anesthesia (sedation) for any reason (e.g. unanticipated prolonged surgical procedure)
  • History of chronic pain
  • History of chronic opioid use/abuse
  • History of Subutex, methadone, other maintenance therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: ITM + Sham QLB
Standard spinal with intrathecal morphine for surgical anesthetic with sham saline block. Saline will be administered as a quadratus lumborum block prior to cesarean section.
Sham subcutaneous non-anesthetic infiltration with saline
Other Names:
  • Saline
Experimental: ITM + Bupivacaine QLB
Standard spinal with intrathecal morphine for surgical anesthetic with ql block with bupivacaine local anesthetic. Interventional drug will be administered prior to cesarean section.
QL plane block with local anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain score with movement
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgical procedure (cesarean delivery)
Post-operative pain accompanied with patient movement will be measured using a 10 point pain scale (VAS)
24 hours after surgical procedure (cesarean delivery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breast feeding success/quality
Time Frame: 12, 24 and 36 hours post-operatively
Limited breastfeeding resulting from pain or opioid side effects
12, 24 and 36 hours post-operatively
VAS pain score at rest
Time Frame: At baseline (PACU entry) and 1, 4, 24 and 48 hours after intervention
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10 point pain scale (VAS)
At baseline (PACU entry) and 1, 4, 24 and 48 hours after intervention
First request for pain medication
Time Frame: From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from the study or requests analgesic medication up until 72 hours
Time to first request for as desired (PRN) oral or parenteral opioid medication will be assessed
From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from the study or requests analgesic medication up until 72 hours
Sedation
Time Frame: From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from study or experiences this event up until 72 hours
Presence or absence will be noted
From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from study or experiences this event up until 72 hours
Pruritis
Time Frame: From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from study or experiences this event up until 72 hours
Presence or absence will be noted
From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from study or experiences this event up until 72 hours
Nausea
Time Frame: From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from study or experiences this event up until 72 hours
Presence or absence will be noted
From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from study or experiences this event up until 72 hours
Emesis
Time Frame: From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from study or experiences this event up until 72 hours
Presence or absence will be noted
From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from study or experiences this event up until 72 hours
Heart Rate
Time Frame: From post-operative every 24 hours until the patient is either withdrawn from or completes the study, on average 72 hours
Will be measured in beats/minute (BPM) per standard of care and documented by study staff
From post-operative every 24 hours until the patient is either withdrawn from or completes the study, on average 72 hours
Anesthetic toxicity
Time Frame: 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 hour, and 4 hours post-operatively
symptoms indicating this event such as perioral numbness, ringing in the ears or metallic taste in the mouth will be noted
15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 hour, and 4 hours post-operatively
Blood pressure
Time Frame: From post-operative every 24 hours until the patient is either withdrawn from or completes the study, on average 72 hours
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff
From post-operative every 24 hours until the patient is either withdrawn from or completes the study, on average 72 hours
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: From post-operative every 24 hours until the patient is either withdrawn from or completes the study, on average 72 hours
Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff
From post-operative every 24 hours until the patient is either withdrawn from or completes the study, on average 72 hours
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: From post-operative every 24 hours until the patient is either withdrawn from or completes the study, on average 72 hours
Will be measured in % per standard of care and documented by study staff
From post-operative every 24 hours until the patient is either withdrawn from or completes the study, on average 72 hours
36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operatively
Quality of life measures will be assessed using the SF-36
48-hours post-operatively
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Short Form
Time Frame: 6-weeks post operatively
Severity of pain and its impact on functioning using BPI Short Form
6-weeks post operatively
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
Time Frame: 6-weeks post operatively
Possible symptoms of depression in the postnatal period will be assessed via EPDS
6-weeks post operatively
Dynamic Pain Visual Analogue scale
Time Frame: 6-weeks postoperatively
Pain score reported by the patient at rest using the VAS scale
6-weeks postoperatively
Opioid use
Time Frame: From post-operative until 36 hours and at 6-weeks postoperatively or until the patient is discharged or withdrawn from study
Total opioid consumption post-operative
From post-operative until 36 hours and at 6-weeks postoperatively or until the patient is discharged or withdrawn from study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Amy Monroe, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No plans to share

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on ITM + Sham QLB

3
Subscribe