- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03261193
ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain (qlcsection)
QL Block for Post-cesarean Delivery Pain
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this trial is to determine the efficacy of a postoperative analgesia strategy that incorporates quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in conjunction with a multi-modal post-cesarean analgesia strategy. The investigators hypothesize that QLB will provide superior post-cesarean analgesia compared to the current standard of care, multi-modal analgesia.
Thus, analgesia following cesarean section using QLB compared to the current standard of care alone will be further investigated. Current practice for cesarean surgical intervention consists of multi-modal analgesia (i.e., Intrathecal morphine (ITM) and scheduled post-operative non-opioid oral analgesics, with oral opioid analgesics reserved for breakthrough pain).
Investigators will measure side-effects associated with each strategy: Standard of care methods consisting of intrathecal morphine (ITM) plus scheduled non-opioid analgesics in conjunction with prn opioid analgesics for breakthrough pain will be utilized for both. The experimental treatment arm will entail standard of care in addition to QLB. The sham comparator will entail standard of care in addition to QLB with saline.
For each strategy, we will measure and model associated economic ramifications; such factors will include drug costs, procedure costs, and costs associated with length of stay and re-admissions.
The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is similar to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, but differs slightly in regards to the anatomical region where local anesthetic is injected. Since the quadratus lumborum (QL) is more posteriorly located, it theoretically confers greater safety due to enhanced visualization. The TAP block has been studied extensively for post-cesarean delivery pain, consistently showing that it is not superior to ITM for post-operative analgesia; however, it may prove to be helpful in patients with breakthrough pain despite the use of ITM, or in patients who were unable to receive ITM (e.g. general anesthesia for cesarean, contraindications to neuraxial morphine). Thus, ITM is superior to TAP alone for post-cesarean analgesia, but it is associated with a dose-dependent increased risk for opioid related side effects. In 2015, Blanco et. al. published a study specifically using the QLB for postoperative pain after cesarean delivery. In this study, they compared a true QLB to a sham QLB all in patients who did not receive ITM, and found that the QLB provided improved pain control and decreased the need for post-operative opioids. Another study in 2016 demonstrated that the QLB is superior to the TAP block in regards to decreasing post-operative pain following c-section. Unfortunately, neither study compared the QLB to ITM (part of the current gold standard for post-cesarean delivery pain, multimodal analgesia).
The gap in knowledge regarding the utility of QLB as part of a multimodal analgesic approach including ITM for cesarean section warrants further investigation. Clinicians are constantly searching for methods to provide patients with the most effective medical interventions that provide maximal benefit and minimal harm. Post-operative pain control following cesarean delivery is an area that is important to patients and to providers, and the introduction of the QLB for this purpose has the potential to improve analgesic benefit.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- Magee Women's Hospital of UPMC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Elective cesarean planned under spinal anesthesia
- Singleton pregnancy
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score of 2 (or less)
- Gestational age of at least 37 weeks
- Intention to breastfeed infant
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications to neuraxial blockade (such as clinically relevant coagulopathy, recent anticoagulant use, patient refusal, or localized skin infection overlying the site of needle entry)
- Anatomical abnormalities contraindicating spinal or QLB placement
- Received/Conversion to general anesthesia
- Received supplemental parenteral anesthesia (sedation) for any reason (e.g. unanticipated prolonged surgical procedure)
- History of chronic pain
- History of chronic opioid use/abuse
- History of Subutex, methadone, other maintenance therapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: ITM + Sham QLB
Standard spinal with intrathecal morphine for surgical anesthetic with sham saline block.
Saline will be administered as a quadratus lumborum block prior to cesarean section.
|
Sham subcutaneous non-anesthetic infiltration with saline
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: ITM + Bupivacaine QLB
Standard spinal with intrathecal morphine for surgical anesthetic with ql block with bupivacaine local anesthetic.
Interventional drug will be administered prior to cesarean section.
|
QL plane block with local anesthesia
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score With Movement
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgical procedure (cesarean delivery)
|
Post-operative pain accompanied with patient movement will be measured using a 10-point pain scale (VAS).
The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
|
24 hours after surgical procedure (cesarean delivery)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Breast Feeding Success/Quality
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operatively
|
Limited breastfeeding resulting from pain or opioid side effects
|
24-hours post-operatively
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 1 hour after intervention
|
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS).
The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
|
1 hour after intervention
|
|
First Request for Pain Medication
Time Frame: From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from the study or requests analgesic medication up until 72 hours
|
Time to first opioid dose (measured in hours)
|
From post-operative until the patient is either withdrawn from the study or requests analgesic medication up until 72 hours
|
|
Sedation
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
|
Presence or absence will be noted.
Will be measured via Ramsay Sedation Score which ranges on a scale of 1 to 6 as follows: 1-patient is anxious, agitated, or restless.
2-patient is co-operative and oriented.
3-patient responds to commands only.
4-patient exhibits brisk response to light stimuli or loud auditory stimuli.
5-patient exhibits sluggish response to light or auditory stimuli.
6-patient exhibits no response.
|
24-hours post-operative
|
|
Pruritis
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
|
Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3).
0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching
|
4-hours post-operative
|
|
Nausea/Vomiting
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
|
Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment
|
4-hours post-operative
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
|
4-hours post-operative
|
|
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff
|
4-hours post-operative
|
|
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in % per standard of care and documented by study staff
|
4-hours post-operative
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 4 hours after intervention
|
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS).
The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
|
4 hours after intervention
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention
|
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS).
The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
|
24 hours after intervention
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 48 hours after intervention
|
VAS pain score reported by the patient at rest post-operatively using a 10-point pain scale (VAS).
The VAS scale is measured with 0=no pain at all and 10=most severe pain possible.
|
48 hours after intervention
|
|
Pruritis
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
|
Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3).
0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching
|
24-hours post-operative
|
|
Pruritis
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
|
Presence or absence will be noted via standard pruritus scale (0-3).
0 being no evidence of pruritus, group 1 being pruritus on diseased skin, group 2 being pruritus on non-diseased skin, and group 3 being chronic reactive lesions acquired from skin manipulation, such as rubbing, picking, or scratching
|
48-hours post-operative
|
|
Nausea/Vomiting
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
|
Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment
|
24-hours post-operative
|
|
Nausea/Vomiting
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
|
Presence or absence will be noted via a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0-no nausea, 1-mild nausea not requesting pharmacological rescue, 2-moderate nausea requesting pharmacological rescue, and 3-severe nausea resistant to pharmacological treatment
|
48-hours post-operative
|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
|
Standard heart rate obtained
|
4-hours post-operative
|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
|
Standard heart rate obtained
|
24-hours post-operative
|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
|
Standard heart rate obtained
|
48-hours post-operative
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
|
24-hours post-operative
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
|
48-hours post-operative
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 4-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
|
4-hours post-operative
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
|
24-hours post-operative
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in mmHG per standard of care and documented by study staff.
|
48-hours post-operative
|
|
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: 24-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff
|
24-hours post-operative
|
|
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: 48-hours post-operative
|
Will be measured in rate/min per standard of care and documented by study staff
|
48-hours post-operative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Amy Monroe, University of Pittsburgh
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PRO16120234
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompleted
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedAcute Postoperative Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainTurkey
-
Children's National Research InstituteVentureWellRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Acute Pain | Acute Pain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpUnknown
Clinical Trials on ITM + Sham QLB
-
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruitingPatients Undergoing Major Laparoscopic Abdominal SurgeryChina
-
Coombe Women and Infants University HospitalCompletedQuadratus Lumborum BlockIreland
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain | AnesthesiaTurkey
-
Schulthess KlinikMedical University InnsbruckUnknown
-
AUSL Romagna RiminiRecruitingCesarean Section | Post Operative PainItaly
-
Ain Shams UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit UniversityCompletedQuadratus Lumborum Block | Opioid Consumption | Perioperative Analgesia | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensActive, not recruitingAnalgesia | Quadratus Lumborum Block | Abdominoplasty | Locoregional AnesthesiaFrance
-
Medical University of GdanskSuspendedTotal Hip ArthroplastyPoland