Trial Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes of Pediatric Laceration Closure Using Skin Glue, Medical Tape Versus Stitches

September 7, 2022 updated by: Holly Hanson, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes of Pediatric Laceration Closure Using a Tissue Adhesive (Dermabond™) Versus Adhesive Strips (Steri-Strips™) Versus Absorbable Sutures

There are several methods of closing a skin cut: stitches, skin glue, and medical tape. Stitches have been used for a long time to close skin cuts. Skin glue (invented in the 1970s) and medical tape (invented in the 1960s) are two newer methods to close skin cuts. The purpose of this study is to find out which method (stitches, skin glue, or medical tape) of closing skin cuts results in the least amount of scarring. Other things the investigators will be looking at are which method is the cheapest, which causes the least pain, which requires the least amount of sedation, and which method patients and parents like the best.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

When a child comes in to the Emergency Room with a skin cut, if the child and their parents consent to being in the study, they will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: stitches, skin glue, or medical tape. There will be about 30 kids in each group, and thus a goal of 90 kids total in the study.

In the Emergency Room, a lidocaine ointment will be placed on the child's cut to decrease pain. The cut will be cleaned out with sterile saline. Then, depending on which method is used, the cut will be closed with either stitches, skin glue, or medical tape by their doctor. The participants will be asked to answer a short questionnaire. Finally, they will be given discharge instructions and sent home. At 3 months, the investigators will call parents for a quick questionnaire over the phone and parents will be asked to take a picture of the patient's scar and send it to the study staff.

Once all 90 pictures have been collected, two Plastic Surgeons will be asked to rate the scars in terms of how they look. The Plastic Surgeons will not know which method was used to close which cut. Once all of the scars have been rated, the averages of scars will be compared for each closure method. The investigators will also look at how much each method cost, how much extra pain medications or sedation each group used, and which method was liked best.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical complaint of laceration
  • Single, linear laceration
  • Laceration less than 5 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width
  • Laceration less than 12 hours old
  • Laceration minimally contaminated (no visible dirt in wound)
  • Parents and child speak English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant medical history that may impact wound healing (hematologic or oncologic diagnosis requiring chemotherapy, ichthyosis, epidermolysis bullosa, etc.)
  • Use of oral steroids (more than 5 days in the past month)
  • History of keloid formation
  • Allergy to skin glue, medical tape, or topical anesthetics
  • Lacerations requiring deep sutures
  • Lacerations caused by animal bites or scratches
  • Lacerations located on the scalp, eyebrow, eyelid, lip, mucosa, joint or nail bed
  • No access to photographic capabilities (camera or smartphone) and/or e-mail, OR unable to return to the Vanderbilt Children's Hospital Emergency Room to have a picture taken at 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Absorbable Sutures
Patients will have their laceration closed with sutures that absorb on their own and do not need to be removed.
The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with absorbable sutures.
Other Names:
  • Stitches
Experimental: Steri-Strips
Patients will have their laceration closed with a special medical tape called "Steri-Strips."
The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with Steri-Strips.
Other Names:
  • Medical tape
Experimental: Dermabond
Patients will have their laceration closed with a special skin glue called "Dermabond"
The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with Dermabond.
Other Names:
  • Skin glue

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cosmetic Outcome of Scar at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
Two blinded Plastic Surgeons will rate the cosmetic outcome of the laceration using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "worst scar" and a score of 100 corresponding to "best scar"
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Experienced by Patient as Reported by Parent
Time Frame: Baseline
Parents will each be asked to score how much pain they felt the patient experienced using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "No pain" and a score of 100 corresponding to "Terrible pain."
Baseline
Satisfaction With Time in the Emergency Department
Time Frame: Baseline to wound closure, up to 30 minutes
Parents will report their satisfaction with Emergency Department length of stay using a 100-point visual analog scale with "100" meaning completely satisfied and "0" meaning not at all satisfied
Baseline to wound closure, up to 30 minutes
Likelihood That Parent Would Recommend Laceration Closure Method
Time Frame: Post-wound closure, approximately 30 minutes
Parents will be asked to rate how likely they would be to recommend the closure method used for their child using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "Extremely unlikely" and a score of 100 corresponding to "Extremely likely"
Post-wound closure, approximately 30 minutes
Number of Complications of the Wound Site
Time Frame: 3 months
Parents will be asked by phone at 3 months if there were any complications with their child's cut (infection, opening of the wound, etc.). Investigators will count the number of complications reported.
3 months
Parental Reported Satisfaction With the Cosmetic Appearance of the Scar
Time Frame: 3 months
Parents will rate the cosmetic outcome of the laceration using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "worst scar" and a score of 100 corresponding to "best scar".
3 months
Presence of Train Tracks at the Scar Site
Time Frame: 3 months
Plastic Surgeons will record if a scar appears to have "train tracks" (or small dots on either side of a scar, all along the scar, usually caused by stitches) as they are rating each photo of the scar at 3 months post-closure. Surgeons will answer "yes" or "no".
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Holly R Hanson, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 171108

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laceration

Clinical Trials on Absorbable Sutures

3
Subscribe