Different Sutures in Hand Surgery

December 24, 2019 updated by: David Ring, University of Texas at Austin

A Randomized Controlled Trial: Nylon Versus Chromic Sutures in Hand Surgery

This study aims to assess the relationship between overall satisfaction with treatment in a group of randomized patients undergoing elective hand surgery using either absorbable (4-0 Chromic) or non-absorbable (5-0 Nylon) sutures. The investigators will also assess factors associated with wound concerns, pain intensity, magnitude of limitations, and physical function within one month of surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Austin Regional Clinic
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
        • HTB Musculoskeletal Institute
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78751
        • Orthopedic Specialists of Austin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing common day-case elective hand surgery under local anesthesia, one of the following (initial) procedures:

    • Carpal tunnel release
    • Trigger finger release
    • Ganglion excision
    • Excisional biopsy
    • De Quervain release
    • Dupuytren fasciectomy
    • Any other minor hand surgery
  • Patients aged 18-89
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Able to understand English or Spanish to complete questionnaires
  • Patients who have an email-address or phone number (needed for follow-up)
  • UT Health Austin Musculoskeletal Institute, Austin Regional Clinic, Orthopaedic Specialists of Austin.
  • Available for follow-up contact after 4 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not able to give informed consent
  • Patients using corticosteroids
  • Patients with one of the following comorbidities: bleeding disorder, immunodeficiency, collagen vascular disease.
  • Patients known to be allergic to suture materials
  • Revision procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1st random 50% of cohort
Absorbable Chromic gut sutures
In this group interrupted simple or horizontal mattress skin sutures are used for wound closure per surgeon preference. Standardized wound care instructions will be given to all patients. Those who received absorbable Chromic sutures are treated recording to the standard protocol and they are advised that they can start to gently rub the scab and suture line to encourage the sutures to fall off starting 10-14 days postoperatively.
Active Comparator: 2nd random 50% of cohort
Non-absorbable Nylon sutures
In this group interrupted simple or horizontal mattress skin sutures are used for wound closure per surgeon preference. Standardized wound care instructions will be given to all patients. Those who received Nylon sutures are treated recording to the standard protocol and sutures are removed after the usual time (10-14 days) of the received procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment satisfaction measured on an 11-point ordinal scale
Time Frame: Four weeks after surgery
The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores representing higher treatment satisfaction.
Four weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Factors associated with wound concerns within one month of surgery
Time Frame: Four weeks after surgery
Factors will include patient demographic factors such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, level of education. Wound concerns will be assessed by number of contacts with questions for wound concerns.
Four weeks after surgery
Factors associated with pain intensity (11 point ordinal scale) within one month of surgery
Time Frame: Four weeks after surgery
Factors will include patient demographic factors such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, level of education. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores representing higher pain intensity.
Four weeks after surgery
Factors associated with magnitude of limitations (with PROMIS-UE PF) within one month of surgery
Time Frame: Four weeks after surgery
Factors will include patient demographic factors such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, level of education. PROMIS-UE PF scores are reported as T-scores with a mean of 50 and SD of 10, with higher scores representing higher levels of physical function.
Four weeks after surgery
Factors associated with scar satisfaction (11 point ordinal scale) within one month of surgery
Time Frame: Four weeks after surgery
Factors will include patient demographic factors such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, level of education. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores representing higher scar satisfaction.
Four weeks after surgery
Difference in treatment satisfaction between patients rating 0-8 and 9-10 on an 11-point ordinal scale
Time Frame: Four weeks after surgery
he scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores representing higher treatment satisfaction.
Four weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Ring, MD PhD, University of Texas at Austin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ganglion Cysts

Clinical Trials on Absorbable Chromic gut sutures

3
Subscribe