Comparison of Post- and Pre-dilutional Hemodiafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients

April 22, 2019 updated by: Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital

Effects of Post- and Pre-dilutional Hemodiafiltration on Patients With End-stage Renal Disease

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a choice of treatment modalities for patients with end-stage renal disease. Hemodiafiltration, combining diffusion and convection, may increase removal of large and middle molecule uremic toxins comparing to conventional hemodialysis. The techniques of hemodiafiltration include pre-dilution and post-dilution according to the infusion site of substitution fluid. Post-dilution HDF is most widely used because of higher removal rate of uremic toxins. However, hemoconcentration and clotting of membrane limit its further clearance of toxins. Pre-dilution may preserve membrane permeability and maintain hemodynamic status. Although lower clearance of small molecule uremic toxins, one study in Japan showed survival benefits of pre-dilution HDF, comparing to post-dilution HDF. The aim of this study was to compare pre-dilution and post-dilution HDF in terms of their clinical and biological parameters and clearance of uremic toxins by using cross-over study design.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  1. Study design: randomly assigned, cross-over study.
  2. Patient number: 60.
  3. Inclusion criteria: stable patients end-stage renal disease who were older than 20 years and received thrice-weekly standard hemodialysis for more than 3 months were recruited.
  4. Exclusion criteria: active systemic disease, liver cirrhosis, active malignancy, receiving immunosuppressive treatment, dialysis with temporal non-tunneled catheter, inadequate dialysis dose (single-pooled Kt/V<1.2).
  5. Methods:

    Prior to randomization, a Charlson Comorbidity Index score and baseline characteristics are recorded for each patient. Each patient who received HDF prior to study will received one-month high-flux hemodialysis with target single-pooled Kt/V>1.2 for washout. The baseline characteristics of each patient including dialyzer, dialysis time, blood flow, dialysate flow, replacement volume, pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure and body weight were recorded. The follow-up laboratory data will also be collected: predialysis C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, bicarbonate, sodium, potassium, uric acid, albumin, calcium, phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone, β2-microglobulin, prolactin, fibroblast growth factor 23, α1-microglobulin, indoxyl sulfate, p-cresol sulfate, advance oxidation protein products, advance glycation product, percentage of proinflammatory monocytes; interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, hematocrit, transferrin saturation and ferritin. Urea kinetics including kt/V, Urea reduction ratio and normalized protein catabolic rate are calculated. We also used Physical Symptoms Distress Scale for life quality measurement.

    After randomization, two group received standard prescription of pre- and post-dilution HDF. The prescribed convective volume per treatment of post-dilution mode is based on blood flow, filtration fraction and hematocrit to achieved current recommendation of 23 liter/1.73m2. The convective volume of pre-dilution mode will be at least twice higher than the desired dose in post-dilution mode for each patient. After 3-month stable hemodiafiltration, parameters mentioned above will also be checked. Two group will be switched for another 3-month course and then switch again. The total following time is 12 months.

  6. Outcome: The primary objective is to compare the removal of a wide spectrum of solutes such as middle and protein-bound molecules. Secondary outcomes are intradialytic tolerance, including intradialytic hypotension, cramps and arrhythmia, and life quality measurements.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbour Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

hemodialysis (HD) patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • stable patients end-stage renal disease who were older than 20 years and received thrice-weekly standard hemodialysis for more than 3 months were recruited.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active systemic disease, liver cirrhosis, malignancy, receiving immunosuppressive treatment, dialysis with temporal non-tunneled catheter, inadequate dialysis dose (kt/V<1.2).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Removal of a wide spectrum of solutes
Time Frame: 1 years
The primary objective is to compare the removal of a wide spectrum of solutes such as middle and protein-bound molecules
1 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intradialytic tolerance
Time Frame: 1 years
intradialytic tolerance including symptomatic hypotension, cramps, headache, nutrition, and inflammatory status.
1 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chang-Hsu Chen, MD, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbour Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 106042

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodiafiltration

3
Subscribe