PTSD After ICU Survival - Caring for Patients With Traumatic Stress Sequelae Following Intensive Medical Care (PICTURE)

January 18, 2024 updated by: Jochen Gensichen, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

PTSD After ICU Survival - Caring for Patients With Traumatic Stress Sequelae Following Intensive Medical Care - a Multi-Center, Observer-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial With a Psychological Intervention

During the PICTURE trial a short narrative therapy (narrative exposure therapy adapted for primary care) for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after intensive care treatment is to be carried out by their general practitioner (GP). During regular practice hours, this is often difficult. For this reason, we are investigating whether the regular treatment can be improved by a specially trained GP.

The aim of the study is to investigate the effects and applicability of a short version of an established narrative therapy for patients with posttraumatic stress disorders after intensive medical treatment.

Three months after discharge from the intensive care unit, the diagnosis of a PTSD symptoms is verified and the patients are randomized into two groups.

In the treatment group, the physician will perform three 45-minute therapy sessions with the patient within 6 weeks. During the first session a list of the most intense events - both positive and negative - in the life of the patient is drawn on the basis of a life line, with the stay at the intensive care unit being one of these events. The second session deals with the experience during intensive care in detail, led by the GP. During the third session, another event from the patient's life will be discussed in the same manner. This way, the different components (cognitions, emotions, body reactions, context information) can be reconnected and classified into the patient's own biography. Between the therapy sessions, a conversation between the GP and the psychologist will take place to support the GP during the therapy. In order to monitor the patient's safety and compliance, standardized telephone calls between the patient and the GP practice are regularly carried out every 2-3 weeks in between therapy sessions up to the first data collection after 6 months (T1).

In the control group there are three doctor-patient contacts, too, which content is based on the patient's symptoms. This group thus receives the standard therapy which is customary in practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The treatment of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in general practice is usually symptom-oriented and does not necessarily involve a proactive approach. Instead, PTSD is often not verbalized, and patients are treated symptomatically or referred to specialists / psychologists, often associated with long waiting times.

We are conducting this trial to investigate a short, narrative exposure therapy (NET) adapted for the use by general practitioners (GPs) in patients with PTSD symptoms after intensive care treatment. NET is the only method that has proved to be successful in PTSD patients, even when used by paramedics, nurses or local counselors, and is therefore also suitable for physicians without extensive psychological training The aim of our study is 1) to examine the feasibility and safety of a NET-oriented therapy in primary care, and 2) to examine the effects of the NET-oriented therapy in comparison to standard care by collecting results 6 and 12 months after diagnosis.

The intervention is being investigated in a randomized controlled, observer-blinded multicenter study with two arms. 318 patients (and their GPs) are included in 2 locations (Munich & Berlin) in Germany.

3 months after discharge from intensive care unit, the diagnosis of PTSD symptoms in participants is verified by the GP and patients are randomly assigned to either treatment group or the control group.

In the treatment group, the GPs receive training in executing narrative exposure therapy by specialized psychologists. The doctors of this group will hold three 45-minute therapy sessions with their patient within 6 weeks. During the first session a list of the most intense events - both positive and negative - is drawn up in the life of the patient on the basis of a life line, with the stay at the intensive care unit being one of these events. During the second session the experience in the intensive care unit will be discussed in detail, led by the GP. During the third session, another event from the patient's life is dealt with in the same manner. This way, the different components (cognitions, emotions, body reactions, context information) can be reconnected and classified into the patient's own biography. Between therapy sessions, the GP and the psychologist will schedule a conversation for support and supervision of the GP during the therapy. In order to monitor the patient's safety and compliance, standardized telephone calls between the patient and the GP's practice are regularly carried out every two-three weeks in between the therapies sessions and up to the first data collection after six months (T1).

In the control group, the GPs receive training in treatment of PTSD according to guidelines. In this group, there are also 3 consultations between GP and patient. However, the content of these consultations is based on the patient's symptoms. This group thus receives the standard therapy which is customary in practice.

The data necessary for the evaluation of the intervention is collected 6 and 12 months after the first GP appointment, during which the diagnosis was verified.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

318

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
      • München, Germany, 80336
        • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Patients:

Inclusion Criteria: Symptoms for Posttraumatic Stress disorder (PDS-5 [2016] Score ≥ 15 (20-item Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) -5)); written informed consent of the patient is present; sufficient knowledge of the German language in word and writing; patients must be able to follow study instructions and likely to attend and complete all required visits and telephone surveys.

Exclusion criteria: physical or psychiatric condition which may put the patient at risk, may confound the trial results or may interfere with the patient's participation in this trial; known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs or alcohol as assessed by the GP; major depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 23), acute suicidality, life expectancy <6 months at T0; already receiving another psychotherapeutic trauma therapy such as Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EDMR) or Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) at T0; any neuroleptic, anticholinergic or anti-epileptic drugs as permanent medication for specific psychiatric disease within the last two weeks prior to baseline;

GPs:

Inclusion criteria: providing family doctor services for ≥ 2 years within the German statutory health care system, holding a certificate for "Basic Psychosomatic Care" (German Medical Association 2001), alternatively, GP has to be a family doctor within the German statutory health care system for ≥ 5 years with adequate psychological, psychosomatic or psychiatric qualification; informed consent of the GP is present Exclusion criteria: GPs: > 80% of patients with a specific mental condition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention-group
Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET): for GP-practice adapted version of narrative exposure therapy during 3 sessions (à 45 minutes)
Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) in an Primary-care adapted Version in 3 sessions (S) 6 weeks (S1), 8 weeks (S2) and 12 weeks (S3) after baseline data collection at T0.
Active Comparator: iTAU group
Improved Treatment-as-usual: 3 GP consultations with patients according to guidelines and adapted to patients' needs
improved standard primary care for PTSD according to Guidelines, customized to patients' needs and symptoms during 3 consultations between T0 and T1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Posttraumatic Stress
Time Frame: from baseline data collection to 6-month follow-up
absolute change in posttraumatic stress symptoms as measured by the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS-5) total severity score; each of the 20 items refers to symptoms experienced in the past month and is answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (more than 5 times per week/severe), total score range 0 - 80 points
from baseline data collection to 6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Posttraumatic Stress
Time Frame: from baseline data collection to 12-month follow-up
absolute change in posttraumatic stress symptoms as measured by the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS-5) total severity score; each of the 20 items refers to symptoms experienced in the past month and is answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (more than 5 times per week/severe), total sum score range 0 - 80 Points, with a high score indicating severe impairment
from baseline data collection to 12-month follow-up
Depression
Time Frame: from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
absolute change in depressive symptoms experienced over the last 2 weeks as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 total score; each of the 9 items items is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day); total sum score range from 0 to 27 points, with a high score indicating severe impairment
from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
Anxiety
Time Frame: from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
absolute change in anxiety severity and impairment as measured by the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) total score; there are 5 response options for each of the 5 items, which are coded from 0 to 4; total sum score range from 0 (no anxiety) to 20 points, with a high score indicating severe impairment
from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
Patient's self-rated health
Time Frame: from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
absolute change in health-related quality of life as measured by the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions (5D) - 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); the EQ-5D-5L VAS is a thermometer-like rating scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
Disability
Time Frame: from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
absolute change in disability as measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 - short version total score (12-item Version); range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher Levels of disability
from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
Patient Activation Measure
Time Frame: from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
absolute change in active participation of patients and the self-management of their state of health as measured by the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13) total score (13-items); each item scores from 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree, 2= disagree, 3=agree, 4= strongly agree; for the fifth item only additionally 5= not applicable); Evaluation is made by adding the raw values with a range of 13 - 52; sum-scale will be calibrated to a 0 to 100 metric
from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
absolute change in health-related costs as measured by the modified Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI) based on direct and indirect costs
from baseline data collection to 6-month and 12-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jochen Gensichen, Prof. Dr., Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, LMU München

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Yes. Deidentified participant data, data dictionary. The data will only be made available to scientific institutions that submit a methodologically meaningful evaluation proposal. Furthermore, applicants must sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available 01-01-2025.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests to be sent to the Principal Investigator for access to the anonymous participant data. Data will be made available to researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved. Data will be made available for the advancement of medical research in line with a Data Use Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Clinical Trials on "Narrative Exposure Therapy"-oriented intervention

3
Subscribe