Endoveneous Histologic Study

November 26, 2018 updated by: Michel Reijnen, Rijnstate Hospital

Histopathological Study of the Vena Saphena Magna After Mechanochemical Endoveneous Ablation

A new technique, mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA), using the ClariVein ® system is recently developed. To date, histopathological data after mechanochemical endovenous ablation are not known.

The aim of this study is the histopathological analysis of venous injury using mechanochemical endovenous ablation.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background:

Varicose veins are a common problem in the Western world. Epidemiological studies show that one quarter of adults have some form of varicose veins. Women are two to three times more affected than men. The prevalence of varicose veins increases steadily with age and is among the top ten of the complaints that people visit their General Practitioner. The main risk factors are prolonged standing or sitting, pregnancy, gender and age. The symptoms of varicose veins are variable and range from cosmetic complaints to venous ulcers.

Stripping of the great saphenous vein(GSV) has been the golden standard for GSV insufficiency for a long time. It is performed under regional or general anesthesia and has a high recurrence rate of 18-40% at 5 years. In addition, the procedure leads to significant postoperative symptoms, especially pain, hematoma and the risk of injury to the saphenous nerve.

In recent years, endovenous techniques have been developed for the treatment of primary GSV insufficiency. Particularly laser endovenous ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (VNUS) became accepted technologies and are widely applied in practice. These thermal-based techniques have the advantage that the surgery can be performed with local anesthesia. In addition, endovenous techniques cause less hematoma, pain, and have superior cosmetics and earlier resumption of normal activities/work compared to the conventional surgical stripping.

Endothermal techniques use heat, which has potential risk to damage surrounding tissues. For this reason, patients are treated with tumiscence anesthesia, requiring multiple punctures around the vein. Most patients experience tumiscence anesthesia as unpleasant. Despite the tumiscence anesthesia, patients may still observe postoperative pain, which may last for weeks.

Laser energy is absorbed and converted into intraluminal heat. This process causes steam bubbles, as described by Proebstle. In previous studies, intraluminal and extraluminal temperature measurements were done during endovenous laser ablation. In addition, acute pathological changes after endovenous laser ablation is studied in a recent study. The loss of laser energy was confined to the inner part of the media. No perivascular damage was seen. However, 1% of patients treated with endovenous laser ablation has nerve damage or paresthesias. It suggests that perivascular damage to some extent still exists.

The effects of foam sclerosis appear to be limited to the endothelium and tunica media of the vein wall. Pathological changes occur rapidly within the first 2 minutes after treatment. After 30 minutes intimal detachment of the tunica media, and the formation of microthrombi are detected. The addition of a balloon injury of the vessel wall prior to foam sclerosis, results in a higher percentage of endothelial damage. However, in practice, the clinical results of foam sclerosis disappointing. The occlusionrate from 1 to 5 years were 81 and 73% in a recent meta-analysis.

A new technique, mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA), using the ClariVein ® system is recently developed. The first studies show that MOCA a safe and effective treatment for varicose veins. This technique uses mechanical damage to the endothelium of the vein wall through a rotating tip of the catheter. At the same time a sclerosans is injected, causing occlusion of the vein. No heating is used in this technique . Tumiscence anesthesia is redundant and complications that occur in thermal endovenous techniques, such as pain, hematoma formation, induration and paresthesias could be reduced. To date, histopathological data after mechanochemical endovenous ablation are not known.

Objective of the study:

The aim of this study is the histopathological analysis of venous injury using mechanochemical endovenous ablation

Study design:

The Endovenous Histology study is a histopathological study on the effects of mechanochemical endovenous ablation. The studycentre will be:

- Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem.

5 patients with irreversible tissue damage to the lower extremities based on atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease will be included in the study Endovenous Histology, after signing informed consent. All patients included, are scheduled for an elective upper or underleg amputation. The preprocedural status will be determined by height, weight, comorbidities, ASA classification, medications, previous vascular surgery and venous duplex of the VSM.

Subsequently 5 patients are treated with MOCA of the VSM to the amputation level prior to the amputation under general or spinal anesthesia.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands, 68ooTA
        • Rijnstate

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Elective indication for leg amputation
  2. Peripheral arterial disease
  3. Age > 18 years
  4. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is incapable of informed consent
  2. Pregancy and lactation
  3. Previous surgical or endovenous treatment of the greater saphenous vein in the amputed leg
  4. Great saphenous vein is used for bypass surgery
  5. INR > 1.8
  6. ASA 5

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Aethoxysklerol clarivein during leg amp
Clarivein treatment with Aethoxysklerol in 5 patients during lower or upper leg amputation
The Clarivein technique uses mechanical damage to the endothelium of the vein wall through a rotating tip of the catheter. At the same time a sclerosans is injected, causing occlusion of the vein. No heating is used in this technique .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occlusion of the with Clarivein treated vein
Time Frame: 2 years of inclusion and analyzation
Occlusion of the with the Clarivein (Aethoxysklerol) treated vein, check wheter or not treatment was succesfull.
2 years of inclusion and analyzation
Depth of damage inside and/or outside the venous wall
Time Frame: 2 years of inclusion and analyzation
Depth of damage inside and/or outside the venous wall is to check whether or not the venous wall is damaged due to the Clarivein treatment
2 years of inclusion and analyzation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analysis of intraluminal clot / scar
Time Frame: 2 years of inclusion and analyzation
After excision of the treated vein of the amputated leg it will be analysed on intraluminal clot/scar
2 years of inclusion and analyzation
Morphological changes of the saphenous nerve due to damage of treatment
Time Frame: 2 years of inclusion and analyzation
Analyses of the changes of the saphenous nerve in the treated area (amputated lef) due to the Clarivein treatment.
2 years of inclusion and analyzation
Perivascular damage resulting from treatment
Time Frame: 2 years of inclusion and analyzation
Analyses of the perivascular damage in the amputated leg as a result of the treatment
2 years of inclusion and analyzation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MMPJ Reijnen, MD, Rijnstate

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL38948.091.12

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Varicose Veins

Clinical Trials on Clarivein

Subscribe