QLB and Radical Cystectomy, Postoperative Pain (BladderQLB)

January 3, 2022 updated by: Tampere University Hospital

Comparing Two Different Analgesic Block Methods for Postoperative Pain and Recovery After Surgery -Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB): the Effect on Peri- and Postoperative Pain and Recovery After Radical Cystectomy

There are ca 1000 new cases of bladder cancer in Finland/year. The curative therapy for high risk bladder cancer is radical cystectomy. The golden standard is still an open surgery despite development of laparoscopic techniques. Epidural analgesia is considered as most effective for the treatment of postoperative pain. However, there is a need for other effective options, because epidural analgesia has some contraindications and risks for serious complications. Recently quadratus lumborum block has gained popularity in the treatment of postoperative pain after various surgeries in the area from hip to mamilla. It is more beneficial than other peripheral blocks, since it covers also the visceral nerves. Contrary to the need of epidural catether a single shot QLB has reported to last up to 48 hours.

Inadequately treated acute postoperative pain is considered as one of the main risk factors for persistent postoperative pain.

44 patients aging 18-85 will be recruited based on a power calculation. The primary outcome measure is the acute postoperative need for rescue analgesics. Secondary outcomes are acute pain (NRS scale), nausea, vomiting, mobilisation and longterm outcomes such as quality of life and persistent pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

44 patients, uindergoing radical cystectomy, aging 18-85 will be recruited based on a power calculation. The 44 patients will be divided in 2 groups, the intervention group receiving a quadratus lumborum block (75mg ropivacaine) and the no intervention group receiving the current standard care of our hospital -an epidural.

The primary outcome measure is the acute postoperative need for rescue analgesics. Secondary outcomes are acute pain (NRS scale), nausea, vomiting, mobilisation and longterm outcomes such as quality of life and persistent pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tampere, Finland, 33521
        • Tampere University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with bladder cancer coming to the open radical cystectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age under 18y or over 85y,
  • diabetes type 1 with complications,
  • no co-operation or inadequate finnish language,
  • persistent pain for other reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Quadratus lumborum block
Single shot bilateral QLB, ropivacaine 75 mg (20 mL) per side, placed under ultrasound control, at the end of surgery. 22 patients will be allocated in this group.
bilateral single shot block, placed under ultrasound control between the thoracolumbar fascial structures close to the quadratus lumborum muscle
Other Names:
  • quadratus lumborum block
No Intervention: Epidural

Epidural catheter (placed before anesthesia induction), ropivacaine 75 mg in 50 mL isotonic saline (1,5 mg/mL), induction bolus after surgery 1 mL/10 kg ideal weight and there on continuous infusion 2-8 mL/h according to analgesic need. 22 patients will be allocated in this group.

This is the current standard for postoperative pain relief in cystectomy patients in our hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
opiate consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
intravenous patient controlled analgesia
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain score
Time Frame: 7 days
numerical rating scale
7 days
postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: 72 hours
numerical rating scale and amount of vomites
72 hours
mobilisation
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
standing up and mobilizing
72 hours after surgery
quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
SF 36
12 months
persistent pain
Time Frame: 12 months
paindetect McGill
12 months
functional query
Time Frame: 12 months
assessment how pain in operation region limits daily functions
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Maija-Liisa Kalliomaki, PhD, Tampere University Hospital, Department of Anesthesia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 1. Finnish Cancer Registry. Cancer in Finland 2007-2011. Cancer Society of Finland Publication, Helsinki. 2. Witjes AJ, Lebret T, Comperat EM et al. Eur Urol. 2016 Jun 30 . 3. Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J et al. Eur Urol. 2016; 70: 176-187. 4. Voldby AW, Brandstrup B. Journal of Intensive Care 2016; 4:27. 5. Rawal N. Eur J Anae sthesiol 2016; 33:160 - 171 6. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ . Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618- 25 7. Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Wu CL, ET AL. The Journal of Pain 2016; 17(2): 158-166. 8. Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, ET AL. The Journal of Pain 2016;17(2):131-157 9. Gustavsson A., Bjorkman J., Ljungcrantz C., ET AL. Eur J Pain 2012:16 ; 289 - 299 10. Breivik H, Bang U, Jalonen J, ET AL Acta Anesthesiol Scand 20 10; 54: 16- 41. 11. Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM Br J Anaesth. 2006 Apr;96(4):418-26. 13. 12. Murouchi T, Iwasaki S, Yamakage M. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:146 - 150. 13. Carney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, ET AL. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:1023 - 30. 14. Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, Shetty N. Reg Anest Pain Med: Nov/Dec 2016 - vol 41 - p 757- 767. 15. Kenneth F Schulz, , Douglas G Altman, David Moher, BMJ 2010;340:c332 16. http://www.consort-statement.org

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 27, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on QLB

3
Subscribe