Effect of Dolutegravir on Etonogestrel Levels in HIV-infected Women in Botswana

February 4, 2020 updated by: Carolyn Westhoff, Columbia University

The Effect of Dolutegravir-based ART on Plasma Etonogestrel Levels in HIV-infected Women Using Contraceptive Implants in Botswana

The primary aim is to assess if etonogestrel (ENG) implant users taking dolutegravir (DTG) have a 20% or greater change in their ENG plasma levels, compared to women taking no antiretroviral therapy (ART). A secondary aim is to assess whether ENG implant users taking dolutegravir have significantly higher ENG plasma levels than ENG implant users taking efavirenz.

This is a cross-sectional, non-randomized evaluation to compare ENG levels between 3 and 12 months post-implant insertion in three groups of women: 1) women using DTG-based ART (n=90), 2) women using EFV-based ART (n=90), and 3) women using no ART (not HIV infected) (n=90). This study will be conducted in Botswana in Southern Africa among women using the ENG implant, and involves a one-time collection of blood and questionnaire.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy is effective in treating HIV and had become standard in the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. However, despite its effectiveness in lowering viral load, there is also solid evidence that it decreases the effectiveness of etonogestrel-releasing implants. This presents a difficult clinical scenario in countries where the HIV burden is significant in reproductive age women.

Following the SINGLE trial, dolutegravir has replaced efavirenz in many settings as first-line ART. In 2016, Botswana became the first country in Africa to adopt this as a guideline, however, the effect that dolutegravir has on hormonal contraceptives has not been widely studied. This project seeks to understand the interaction between etonogestrel levels in HIV-infected women who are using dolutegravir-based ART by directly measuring etonogestrel blood levels using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in HIV-negative and HIV-infected women using contraceptive implants.

Because the implant is fairly new in Botswana, most participants will have had implants inserted 3-12 months prior to study. An HIV-infected, non-ART, comparison group is no longer permissible, practically or ethically, as countries across Africa, including Botswana, are moving to HIV "Test and Treat." This means that ART initiation is now occurring at time of HIV-diagnosis regardless of cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count or disease stage; therefore, in this study, the comparison group will be HIV-uninfected implant users. This comparison will answer the key question of whether the ENG implant when used simultaneously with DTG provides plasma ENG levels comparable to a group in which it has established contraceptive efficacy (i.e. HIV-uninfected, healthy women of reproductive age).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

148

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gaborone, Botswana
        • Botswana-UPenn Partnership

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Reproductive-aged HIV-infected women using dolutegravir and using single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing subdermal implant.

Reproductive-aged HIV-infected women using efavirenz and using single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing subdermal implant.

Reproductive-aged HIV-unifected women using single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing subdermal implant.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Etonogestrel implant as their sole method of hormonal contraception
  • Etonogestrel implant in-situ for three to twelve months.
  • Dolutegravir (DTG) use for at least 60 days (Using DTG-based ART-regimen if applicable)
  • Efavirenz (EFV) use for at least 60 days (Using EFV-based ART-regimen if applicable)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclude women using concomitant enzyme-inducing drugs, including rifampicin for tuberculosis treatment and anti-convulsant medications (phenytoin, carbamazepine, barbiturates, primidone, topiramate, oxcarbazepine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
DTG group
Reproductive-aged HIV-infected women taking dolutegravir-based ART and using single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing, subdermal implant (ENG implant)
HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor used in combination ART
Other Names:
  • DTG
  • Tivicay
Reversible contraception implant
Other Names:
  • Nexplanon ®
  • Implanon NXT ®
  • single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing, subdermal implant
No ART group
Reproductive-aged HIV-uninfected women using single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing, subdermal implant (ENG implant)
Reversible contraception implant
Other Names:
  • Nexplanon ®
  • Implanon NXT ®
  • single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing, subdermal implant
EFV group
Reproductive-aged HIV-infected women taking efavirenz-based ART and using single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing, subdermal implant (ENG implant)
Reversible contraception implant
Other Names:
  • Nexplanon ®
  • Implanon NXT ®
  • single-rod, etonogestrel-releasing, subdermal implant
non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in combination ART
Other Names:
  • Sustiva
  • EFV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference (percentage) in ENG plasma levels in the DTG group compared to no ART group
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after implant
Difference between the DTG group and no ART group
Up to 12 months after implant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference (percentage) in ENG plasma levels in the DTG group compared to EFV group
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after implant
Difference between the DTG group and EFV group
Up to 12 months after implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carolyn L Westhoff, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on dolutegravir

Subscribe