Effects of a Health Workforce Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Intervention in Kinshasa

July 22, 2020 updated by: Jhpiego

Effects of a Health Workforce Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Intervention on Intrapartum Stillbirth, Early Newborn Mortality and Post-pregnancy Family Planning in Kinshasa: a Cluster Randomized Evaluation

The aim of the study is to evaluate a health workforce capacity building and quality improvement intervention focused on integrated day-of-birth and post-pregnancy care at 16 hospitals in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. The intervention package consists of a low-dose, high-frequency (LDHF) training of health workers, support for quality improvement teams, and provision of critical equipment, supplies and drugs within a quality improvement (QI) framework.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The health workforce capacity building and quality improvement intervention will be implemented in two phases: eight facilities will receive the intervention in phase 1 and the remaining eight facilities will receive the intervention in phase 2.

Objective 1: For objective 2 on facility-based health outcomes, the study design is a cluster-randomized evaluation in phase 1. The intervention's effects will be assessed by comparing an intervention group and a control group of facilities. These will be selected from 16 Kinshasa health facilities. Intervention and control facilities' monthly reported health outcomes will be compared in a 12-month baseline period and 12-month period during and after the intervention implementation (Phase 1) in a difference-in-difference analysis. In Phase 2, all facilities will have their monthly service statistics and health outcomes reviewed for trends in improvement.

Overall, in Phase 1, eight intervention sites will be matched to eight sites serving as controls. In Phase 2, the eight Phase 1 control sites will then receive the same package as the intervention sites in Phase 1. Sites will be stratified by case load, low and high (over 90 births per month), and funding (public or private funding). Within each stratum, prior to start of the intervention, there will be random selection to intervention and control groups to allow for baseline comparability between groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Health providers:

    • Currently on the roster of maternity ward providers working at one of the 16 selected facilities at the time of the training module.
    • Willing to attend a Jhpiego clinical training workshop and offer consent as study participant.
    • Age 18 or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • there are no exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phase 1
training for health care workers supplemented by QI teams
Jhpiego will deliver maternal and newborn health and family planning (MNH+FP) training using evidence-based low-dose, high-frequency (LDHF) learning approaches and support hospital staff-led quality improvement efforts to increase the coverage of facility-based high-impact interventions, including care of the mother and newborn on the day of birth and through the first week postpartum and post abortion services.
Other Names:
  • Practice coordinator training after training session
  • Practice sessions using anatomic models
  • SMS reminder messages and quizzes
  • Routine calls between mentors and providers
  • Health information officer training
  • Data collection and use training
  • Supply of simulators, equipment, kits and other
  • Develop quality improvement teams and review of action plans
  • Routine calls between project staff and mentors
No Intervention: Phase 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean number or percent of items correctly answered
Time Frame: 1 day
Each observed structured clinical exam (OSCE) or knowledge tests has between 13 and 38 items. A participant needs to achieve 85% correct score to pass at post-training to assess provider competencies. The main indicator for analysis will be the mean number of items (or percent of items) correctly answered. This mean percent of items correctly answered will be done pre-training, post-training and after 6 months. This will be done in the 8 intervention group facilities only in Phase I and again in the 8 new facilities in Phase II.
1 day
Intrapartum perinatal death ratio
Time Frame: 1 day
Defined as death of a fetus during labor who had heart tones documented on arrival in the maternity and neonatal deaths prior to 24 hours, divided by total births.
1 day
Percent of women after childbirth who adopt a family planning method immediately post-pregnancy or intend to adopt a method by six weeks post-pregnancy.
Time Frame: 3 days
Percent of women after childbirth who adopt a family planning method over all women who give birth in a facility
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
maternal mortality
Time Frame: 3 days
number of maternal deaths over number of live births
3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Virgile Kikaya, Jhpiego DRC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPP1156220

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infant Death

Clinical Trials on training for health care workers supplmented by QI teams

Subscribe