Lifestyle Interventions for the Treatment of Early Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LITES)

March 1, 2024 updated by: Dustin Hammers, Indiana University
The purpose of this study is to generate preliminary data on the benefit of computerized cognitive training and Tai Chi- Qi Gong training in participants with Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease. It is hypothesized that participants in the experimental training condition will perform better on outcomes related to cognition, functioning, and mood at follow-up compared to participants assigned to the active control condition.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to generate preliminary data regarding the efficacy of a combined cognitive-training and Tai Chi- Qi Gong exercise lifestyle intervention in participants diagnosed with Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease (EOAD). Participants will complete a series of cognitive, functional, and mood assessments at a remotely-assessed baseline visit, and then be randomized into one of two conditions: (1) Computerized Cognitive Training + Tai Chi Exercise or (2) Active Control. Outcome measures will be repeated immediately Post-Treatment and at 6-months post-treatment Follow-Up. Specific Aim 1 will examine the feasibility of this lifestyle intervention and outcome assessments when applied to participants with EOAD. Specific Aim 2 will investigate if this lifestyle intervention improves short- and long-term cognition, functioning, and mood. Specific Aim 3 will be exploratory to assess whether individual differences in training or clinical/ demographic characteristics moderate the degree of benefit from this intervention; owing to sample size limitations in this feasibility study, focus of this latter aim will be on determining effect sizes and sample-size magnitude needed for future work.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Dustin B Hammers, PhD
  • Phone Number: 3179638557
  • Email: hammersd@iu.edu

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Recruiting
        • Indiana University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dustin B Hammers, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in the Longitudinal Early-Onset AD Study (LEADS) parent study, and being classified via LEADS consensus criteria as having amyloid-positive Early Onset Alzheimer's Disease
  • Aged 40-64 years at the time of enrollment into LEADS
  • Fluent in English
  • In good general health and absent another neurological disorder
  • Have a knowledgeable informant.
  • Have had a Clinical Dementia Rating scale of 0.5 to 1.0 at the time of enrollment into LEADS
  • Have sufficient vision, hearing, comprehension, and manual dexterity to participate in the testing and training program

Exclusion Criteria:

• Have access to the internet (e.g., home, family, public library, etc.) for less than 4 hours per week

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Cognitive Training and Tai Chi- Qi Gong Arm
Participants receiving 14 weeks of Cognitive Training (BrainHQ) and Tai Chi- Qi Gong exercise training
Participants will be asked to complete approximately 45 minutes of training, 4-5 sessions per week for 14 weeks (corresponding to approximately 40 hours of training total). Training will be completed via BrainHQ, a mobile application that, as used in this study, meets the FDA's definition of a medical device.
Other Names:
  • BrainHQ
Participants will be asked to complete 14 hours of training total (in 30-minute sessions, 2 days per week for 14 weeks).
Active Comparator: Active Control Arm
Participants receiving 14 weeks of Brain Games (BrainHQ) and stretching
Participants will be asked to complete 40 hours of training total (in 45-minute sessions, 4 to 5 days per week for 14 weeks). Training will be completed via BrainHQ, a mobile application that, as used in this study, meets the FDA's definition of a medical device.
Other Names:
  • BrainHQ
Participants will be asked to engage in stretching exercises twice per week, for approximately 15 minutes per session. This will total of approximately 7 hours over the course of 14 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance on CANTAB Connect computerized Memory Composite immediately post-intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
CANTAB Connect computerized Memory Composite was selected for its remote assessment of memory, with validation in Alzheimer's Disease samples. This composite will be calculated from Paired Associates Learning, Pattern Recognition Memory, and Verbal Paired Associates subtests, with higher scores reflected better performance.
15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Performance on CANTAB Connect computerized Executive Composite immediately post-intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
CANTAB Connect computerized Executive Composite was selected for its remote assessment of executive functioning, with validation in Alzheimer's Disease samples. This composite will be calculated from Stockings of Cambridge, Spatial Working Memory, Rapid Visual Processing, and Match To Sample subtests, with higher scores reflected better performance.
15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Performance on CANTAB Connect computerized Memory Composite 26 weeks after intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
CANTAB Connect computerized Memory Composite was selected for its remote assessment of memory, with validation in Alzheimer's Disease samples. This composite will be calculated from Paired Associates Learning, Pattern Recognition Memory, and Verbal Paired Associates subtests, with higher scores reflected better performance.
40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Performance on CANTAB Connect computerized Executive Composite 26 weeks after intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
CANTAB Connect computerized Executive Composite was selected for its remote assessment of executive functioning, with validation in Alzheimer's Disease samples. This composite will be calculated from Stockings of Cambridge, Spatial Working Memory, Rapid Visual Processing, and Match To Sample subtests, with higher scores reflected better performance.
40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Benefit from Cognitive Training using Cognitive Self-Report Questionnaire immediately post-intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Cognitive Self-Report Questionnaire is a 25-item self-report questionnaire of subjective cognitive difficulties. Scores range from 0-125, with higher scores denoting greater cognitive symptoms. This measure has been used in a variety of studies examining benefit from cognitive training.
15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Benefit from Cognitive Training using Cognitive Self-Report Questionnaire 26 weeks after intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Cognitive Self-Report Questionnaire is a 25-item self-report questionnaire of subjective cognitive difficulties. Scores range from 0-125, with higher scores denoting greater cognitive symptoms. This measure has been used in a variety of studies examining benefit from cognitive training.
40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Performance on scales of functioning immediately post-intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Inventory is an informant-based rating scale that assesses the participant's ability to perform a variety of activities of daily living over the past four weeks, and has been shown to discriminate between healthy elderly controls and those with mild Alzheimer's disease. Scores range from 0-78, with higher scores denoting better functional ability.
15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Performance on scales of functioning 26 weeks after intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Inventory is an informant-based rating scale that assesses the participant's ability to perform a variety of activities of daily living over the past four weeks, and has been shown to discriminate between healthy elderly controls and those with mild Alzheimer's disease. Scores range from 0-78, with higher scores denoting better functional ability.
40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Self-reported depression immediately post-intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
21-item Beck Depression Inventory-2 was used as a measure of self-reported depression. Scores range from 0-63, with higher scores denoting greater self-reported depression symptoms.
15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Self-reported depression 26 weeks after intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
21-item Beck Depression Inventory-2 was used as a measure of self-reported depression. Scores range from 0-63, with higher scores denoting greater self-reported depression symptoms.
40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Self-reported quality of life immediately post-intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
13-item Quality of Life- Alzheimer's Disease scale was used as a measure of self-reported quality of life. Scores range from 13-52, with higher scores denoting greater self-reported quality of life.
15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Self-reported quality of life 26 weeks after intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
13-item Quality of Life- Alzheimer's Disease scale was used as a measure of self-reported quality of life. Scores range from 13-52, with higher scores denoting greater self-reported quality of life.
40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Self-reported stress immediately post-intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
4-item Perceived Stress Scale was used as a measure of self-reported stress. Scores range from 0-16, with higher scores denoting greater stress.
15-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
Self-reported stress 26 weeks after intervention, after controlling for baseline performance
Time Frame: 40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up
4-item Perceived Stress Scale was used as a measure of self-reported stress. Scores range from 0-16, with higher scores denoting greater stress.
40-Week Post-Intervention Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dustin B Hammers, PhD, Indiana University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14594
  • AARG-22-926940 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Alzheimer's Association)
  • 1K23AG080071-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Other researchers can contact the PI to request copies of the study data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Training

3
Subscribe