- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03366051
Sentinel Node Mapping in High Risk Endometrial Cancer (ALICE)
February 16, 2022 updated by: Glauco Baiocchi Neto, AC Camargo Cancer Center
Sentinel Node Mapping Versus Sentinel Node Mapping With Systematic Lymphadenectomy in High Risk Endometrial Cancer: a Open Label, Non-inferiority, Randomized Trial.
This study will evaluate the role of systematic lymphadenectomy after sentinel node (SLN) mapping in high risk endometrial cancer (high grade histologies or deep myometrial invasion).
The participants will be randomized in a non-inferiority controlled trial in 2 groups: SLN mapping or SLN mapping followed by systematic lymphadenectomy.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Although most patients with endometrial cancer present with early-stage disease, the standard treatment still includes systematic lymph node dissection for staging.
Recently, SLN mapping has emerged as an acceptable surgical strategy when deciding between complete lymphadenectomy and no node dissection.
This approach can help avoid the morbidity that is associated with a complete lymphadenectomy, such as neurovascular injury, lymphocyst formation, and lymphedema.
A recent meta-analysis that included 55 studies and 4915 patients reported an overall SLN detection rate of 81% versus 50% for bilateral SLNs.
Moreover, the use of indocyanine green increased the bilateral SLN detection rate compared with blue dye (74.6% vs. 50.5%).
Yet, the studies noted an overall sensitivity of 96% and false negative rates of less than 5% when analyzed per hemipelvis.
Since 2014, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines have recommended SLN mapping as an alternative option for node staging in endometrial cancer.
However, most studies on SLN mapping have included patients who are at low risk for lymph node involvement and thus might underestimate the false negative rate.
Recently, Soliman et al. reported a series of only high-grade and deep invasive endometrial cancers for which patients underwent SLN mapping, followed by pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection.
An 89% detection rate was reported, suggesting that SLN mapping accurately identifies node metastases, with an negative predictive value (NPV) of 98% and an false negative predictive value (FNPV) of 2% when analyzed by hemipelvises.
Positive nodes were found in 22.8% of patients (43% of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases), and in 40% of cases, the SLN was the only positive node.
Data from the investigators corroborate these findings-26.7% of high-risk cases had positive nodes (50% of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases), and when analyzed by hemipelvis, the NPV was 97.9% and the FNPV was 2.1%.
In 14 (70%) patients, the SLN was the only positive node.
Moreover, there are few publications that have compared the results of the addition of SLN mapping to lymphadenectomy alone.
Raimond et al. compared 156 patients that had SLN mapping with 95 who had pelvic node dissection.
In their study, SLN mapping and imuno-histochemistry (IHC) were performed in low- and intermediate-risk patients, and the former detected metastatic node 3 times more often than complete pelvic lymphadenectomy alone (16.2% vs. 5.1%, p=0.03).
They had no false negatives, and the IHC findings modified the adjuvant therapy in half of all cases.
Holloway et al. compared a series of 661 patients who had undergone pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with 119 who were subjected to SLN mapping plus node dissection, including 68 high-intermediate- and high-risk patients in the SLN mapping group (GOG99 stratification).
Despite the similarity in demographics and pathological risk factors, the SLN group had more LN metastases that were detected (30.3% vs. 16.3%;
p<0.001) and received more adjuvant therapy (28.6% vs. 16.3%;
p=0.003).
The SLN was the only positive node in 18 (50%) of mapped cases, and the false negative rate was 2.8%.The investigators recently published a series on high risk endometrial cancer and also recorded a higher pelvic node metastasis rate for the SLN mapping group (26.7% vs. 14.3%, p=0.02) but no significant difference in para-aortic node metastases (13.5% vs. 5.6%, p=0.12).
Notably, if considered only patients in whom SLNs were mapped, 31.3% had pelvic positive nodes.
Despite the differences in uterine risk factors between groups, 10.6% (8/75) of patients in the SLN group had node metastasis that was diagnosed only after IHC.
Excluding these patients, the SLN group would have had a node positivity rate of 17.3%, similar to the N-SLN group (17.4%), reinforcing the impact of IHC in the detection of node metastases.
Moreover, the SLN group received more adjuvant chemotherapy (33.5% vs. 48%).
The overall detection rate for SLNs was 85.3%, and bilateral SLNs were observed in 60%.
The investigators noted an overall sensitivity of 90%, a negative predictive value of 95.7%, and a false negative predictive value of 4.3%.
Recently, Touhami et al. showed that the risk of non-SLN metastasis is 61% when the SLN metastasis size is ≥2mm, and 5% for SLN metastasis of <2mm.
However, one of the remaining uncertainties is the role of systematic lymphadenectomy after a positive SLN.
In other words, is there any benefit in favor of systematic lymphadenectomy in a patient that already undergo adjuvant chemotherapy?
The investigators hypothesized that there is no disease free survival benefit in adding systematic lymphadenectomy to only sentinel node mapping and proposed a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing SLN mapping to SLN mapping with systematic lymphadenectomy in high risk endometrial cancer.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
178
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Bruna Goncalves, RN, MSc
- Phone Number: 551121895110
- Email: bruna.goncalves@accamargo.org.br
Study Locations
-
-
Parana
-
Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
- Recruiting
- Hospital Erasto Gaertner
-
Contact:
- Reitan Ribeiro, MD
- Email: reitanribeiro@hotmail.com
-
-
SP
-
Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01509010
- Recruiting
- AC Camargo Câncer Center
-
Contact:
- Glauco Baiocchi, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 551121895110
- Email: glauco.baiocchi@accamargo.org.br
-
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Recruiting
- Albert Einstein Hospital
-
Contact:
- Renato Moretti-Marques, MD, PhD
- Email: morettimarques@gmail.com
-
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Recruiting
- Sao Camilo Oncologia
-
Contact:
- Andre Lopes, MD, PhD
- Email: andrelopes.cirurgia@gmail.com
-
-
Sao Paulo
-
Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Recruiting
- Hospital do Cancer de Barretos
-
Contact:
- Carlos Andrade, MD, PhD
- Email: mdcarlosandrade@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- High grade histologies (endometrioid grade 3, serous, clear cell and carcinosarcoma)
- Endometrioid grades 1 or 2 with myometrial invasion of ≥50%
- Endometrioid grades 1 or 2 with cervical invasion
- Clinically suitable to receive systematic lymphadenectomy
- Consent statement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous hysterectomy in other institution
- Presence of extra-uterine disease (peritoneal, visceral or suspicious lymph node metastasis)
- Previous pelvic node dissection
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Sentinel Node Mapping plus Lymphadenectomy
Patients with high risk endometrial cancer will undergo Sentinel Node Mapping followed by Systematic Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy
|
At least one sentinel node should be retrieved in both hemipelvis.
If no sentinel node is found in one hemipelvis, a side specific lymphadenectomy will be performed.
Systematic Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy
|
Experimental: Sentinel Node Mapping
Patients with high risk endometrial cancer will undergo Sentinel Node Mapping per NCCN algorithm
|
At least one sentinel node should be retrieved in both hemipelvis.
If no sentinel node is found in one hemipelvis, a side specific lymphadenectomy will be performed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Recurrence
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Recurrence Free Survival
|
3 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Survival
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Overall Survival
|
5 years
|
Early morbidity
Time Frame: <30 days after surgery
|
Surgical and clinical morbidity
|
<30 days after surgery
|
Late morbidity
Time Frame: >30 days after surgery
|
Surgical and clinical morbidity
|
>30 days after surgery
|
Lymphedema
Time Frame: Evaluation before surgery and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up
|
Presence and lymphedema graduation
|
Evaluation before surgery and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up
|
Quality of Life Questionary (QLQ)
Time Frame: Evaluation before surgery and after 1 and 6 months of follow-up
|
EORTC QLQ-C30
|
Evaluation before surgery and after 1 and 6 months of follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Glauco Baiocchi, MD, PhD, Department of Gynecologic Oncology - AC Camargo Cancer Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Holloway RW, Abu-Rustum NR, Backes FJ, Boggess JF, Gotlieb WH, Jeffrey Lowery W, Rossi EC, Tanner EJ, Wolsky RJ. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):405-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 May 28.
- Baiocchi G, Mantoan H, Kumagai LY, Goncalves BT, Badiglian-Filho L, de Oliveira Menezes AN, Faloppa CC, De Brot L, da Costa AABA. The Impact of Sentinel Node-Mapping in Staging High-Risk Endometrial Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;24(13):3981-3987. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6132-8. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
- Holloway RW, Gupta S, Stavitzski NM, Zhu X, Takimoto EL, Gubbi A, Bigsby GE, Brudie LA, Kendrick JE, Ahmad S. Sentinel lymph node mapping with staging lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer increases the detection of metastasis. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 May;141(2):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
- Soliman PT, Westin SN, Dioun S, Sun CC, Euscher E, Munsell MF, Fleming ND, Levenback C, Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT, Lu KH. A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node mapping for high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):234-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 May 18.
- Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J, Cantrell L, Schuler K, Hanna RK, Method M, Ade M, Ivanova A, Boggess JF. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):384-392. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30068-2. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
- Bodurtha Smith AJ, Fader AN, Tanner EJ. Sentinel lymph node assessment in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):459-476.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1033. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
- Abu-Rustum NR. Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: a modern approach to surgical staging. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Feb;12(2):288-97. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0026.
- Raimond E, Ballester M, Hudry D, Bendifallah S, Darai E, Graesslin O, Coutant C. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on the therapeutic management of early-stage endometrial cancer: Results of a retrospective multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jun;133(3):506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
- Baiocchi G, Andrade CEMC, Ribeiro R, Moretti-Marques R, Tsunoda AT, Alvarenga-Bezerra V, Lopes A, Costa RLR, Kumagai LY, Badiglian-Filho L, Faloppa CC, Mantoan H, De Brot L, Dos Reis R, Goncalves BT. Sentinel lymph node mapping versus sentinel lymph node mapping with systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial (ALICE trial). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 May 3;32(5):676-679. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003378.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 22, 2017
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 20, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 20, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 4, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
December 8, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 18, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 16, 2022
Last Verified
February 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2.392.088
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endometrial Cancer
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversité Montpellier; Ecole d'econmie de Paris (PSE)-Hospinnomics; Université...CompletedEndometrial Cancer Stage I | Endometrial Cancer Stage IIFrance
-
Radboud University Medical CenterMaastricht University Medical Center; Erasmus Medical Center; Catharina Ziekenhuis... and other collaboratorsRecruitingEndometrial Cancer Recurrent | Endometrial Cancer Stage III | Endometrial Cancer Stage IVNetherlands
-
Batman Training and Research HospitalEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedGynecologic Cancer | Endometrial Cancer Stage
-
Samsung Medical CenterRecruitingEndometrial Cancer Stage IKorea, Republic of
-
Duke UniversityDuke Cancer InstituteCompleted
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalCompletedOutcome of Endometrial CancerTaiwan
-
Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.RecruitingAdvanced Endometrial CancerChina
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedAdvanced Endometrial CancerBelgium, France, Italy, Canada, Spain, Australia, Germany, United States, Japan, Brazil, Singapore, Russian Federation, Poland
-
Masonic Cancer Center, University of MinnesotaCompletedCervical Cancer | Ovarian Cancer | Uterine Endometrial CancerUnited States
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedSerous Papillary Endometrial CancerIsrael
Clinical Trials on Sentinel Node Mapping
-
Stephen PovoskiCompletedInvasive Breast CancerUnited States
-
Gynecologic Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedVulvar CancerUnited States
-
UMC UtrechtWithdrawn
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteRecruitingBreast Cancer | Sentinel Lymph Node | Inflammatory Breast CancerUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingMelanoma | Eye DiseaseUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingCervical Adenocarcinoma | Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified | Stage IA2 Cervical Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer AJCC v6 and v7United States, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Mexico, Argentina, Australia, Thailand
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalCompletedLymphadenectomy | Early Stage Endometrial Cancer | Sentinel Lymph NodesTaiwan
-
Zuyderland Medisch CentrumRecruiting
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingFIGO Grade 1 Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma | FIGO Grade 2 Endometrial Endometrioid AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu BranchNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityRecruitingBreast Cancer | Sentinel Lymph NodeTaiwan