Comparative Effectiveness of COPD Treatments

July 10, 2019 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Comparative Effectiveness of Combination Therapies in COPD

To assess the effectiveness of maintenance treatment of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with the combination of a long-acting bronchodilators (LABA and the long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) tiotropium (LABA-TIO)) compared with the combination of a LABA and an ICS (LABA-ICS) on the time to COPD exacerbation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3954

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montreal, Canada, H3T 1E2
        • Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 55 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The base cohort will consist of all patients with a diagnosis of COPD from 1 January 1995 until 31 December 2015 who subsequently received at least one prescription for a long-acting bronchodilator, either LABA or tiotropium, or for an inhaled corticosteroid, alone or in combination, from 1 January 2002 until 31 December 2015.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • New users of long-acting bronchodilators, LABA and tiotropium on the same date or of LABA and ICS, either as a fixed-dose combination or free combination, on the same date between January 2002 and December 2015
  • Diagnosis of COPD and age ≥ 55 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than one year of medical history information prior to the date of combined treatment initiation (cohort entry)
  • Asthma diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Subjects diagnosed with COPD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
combinational drug
Other Names:
  • FORVENT, SPIRIVA, SRIVASSO
combinational drug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Observed Patients With First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation to Occur After Cohort Entry
Time Frame: 12 Years
The number of observed patients with first COPD exacerbation after cohort entry was reported. The event of time to first COPD exacerbation to occur after cohort entry was defined as a hospitalization for COPD (severe exacerbation) or the prescription of an oral corticosteroid, namely prednisolone (moderate exacerbation) to occur after cohort entry with one-year follow-up, from the as-treated analysis.
12 Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Rate of COPD Exacerbations
Time Frame: 12 years
Incidence rates and rate ratios of the moderate or severe exacerbation associated with LABA-TIO relative to LABA-ICS in patients with COPD, with one-year follow-up, from the as-treated analysis, estimated.
12 years
The Occurrence of the First Hospitalization for Community-acquired Pneumonia (Serious Pneumonia)
Time Frame: 12 years
The number of the first occurences of the hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (serious pneumonia)associated with LABA-TIO relative to LABA-ICS in patients with COPD, with one-year follow-up, from the as-treated analysis and from the time-dependent on-treatment analysis based on current exposure is presented. On-treatment exposure was based on analysis of current use during the entire 1-year follow-up, allowing patients to switch treatments.
12 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on LABA and the LAMA tiotropium (LABA-TIO)

Subscribe