Pilot Study of Pirfenidone in Pulmonary Fibrosis With Anti-myeloperoxydase Antibodies (PIRFENIVAS)

April 30, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis With Anti-myeloperoxydase (MPO) Antibodies or With Anti-MPO Associated Vasculitis."

The purpose of this study is to determine wether pirfenidone is safe and effective in the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis with anti-myeloperoxydase (MPO) antibodies or pulmonary fibrosis with anti-MPO associated vasculitis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pulmonary fibrosis can be associated with Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA) directed against MPO or with anti-MPO associated vasculitis, leading to increased disability and poor prognosis. The pathophysiology of this association remains unclear. Conventional therapies used for the treatment of vasculitis manifestations are often disappointing for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis. The main cause of death in patients with anti-MPO ANCA associated vasculitis and associated pulmonary fibrosis is the progression of pulmonary fibrosis. No treatment has demonstrated efficacy to stabilize or improve pulmonary fibrosis associated with anti-MPO associated vasculitis.

Previous studies showed that Pirfenidone improves survival and pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and that Pirfenidone treatment is safe and well tolerated in IPF. Patients with anti-MPO associated vasculitis (or anti-MPO antibodies without vasculitis) and associated pulmonary fibrosis might benefit from the use of Pirfenidone. However, the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with anti-MPO associated vasculitis and associated pulmonary fibrosis has not been evaluated. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with pulmonary fibrosis and anti-MPO ANCA associated vasculitis or anti-MPO antibodies without vasculitis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Cochin Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Presence of anti-MPO antibody (ELISA) at inclusion or during pulmonary fibrosis follow-up and/or diagnosis of anti-MPO associated vasculitis according to the 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference definitions
  • Definite or possible Usual Interstitial Pneumonia or Non Specific Interstitial Pneumonia based on high-resolution computed tomography
  • Presence of pulmonary fibrosis, defined as a range of 50 to 90% of the %FVC and a range of 30 to 90% of the %DLCO
  • Pulmonary fibrosis refractory (according to the investigator's judgment) to a conventional regimen used for anti-MPO associated vasculitis when a treatment against vasculitis has been used
  • Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent (including consent for the use and disclosure of research-related health information) and comply with the study protocol procedures (including required study visits)
  • Have affiliation with a mode of social security (profit our being entitled).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other type of systemic vasculitis;
  • Active vasculitis defined by Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score >3 (BVAS) ;
  • Contraindication to Pirfenidone;
  • Unable to perform pulmonary function test (PFT);
  • Pregnancy or lactation. Women of childbearing capacity are required to have a negative serum pregnancy test before treatment and must agree to maintain highly effective contraception by practicing abstinence or by using an effective method of birth control from the date of consent through the end of the study : implants of levonorgestrel; injectable progesterone; any intrauterine device (IUD) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year; oral contraceptives (either combined or progesterone only); double barrier method (condom, cervical cap or diaphragm with spermicidal agent); transdermal contraceptive patch; male partner who is sterile prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for the female subject;
  • Any of the following liver function test criteria above specified limits: total bilirubin above 1,5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), excluding patients with Gilbert's syndrome; aspartate (AST)/Glutamate Oxaloacétique Transaminase (SGOT) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/Glutamate Pyruvate Transaminase (SGPT), (AST/SGOT or ALT/SGPT) >3 × ULN; alkaline phosphatase >2.5 × ULN;
  • Creatinine clearance (CrCl<30) mL/min, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula at screening
  • Current treatment with Nintedanib or past treatment with Nintedanib in the last 12 months;
  • Current treatment with Fluvoxamine or past treatment with Fluvoxamine in the last 28 days before screening
  • Prior use of Pirfenidone or known hypersensitivity to any of the components of study treatment;
  • Expected to receive a lung transplant within 1 year from randomization or, on a lung transplant waiting list at randomization;
  • Associated connective tissue disease (such as systemic sclerosis).;
  • Electrocardiogram (ECG), with a heart-rate-corrected QT interval (corrected using Fridericia's formula, QTcF) ≥ 500 ms at Screening, or a family or personal history of long QT syndrome;
  • Treatment with Cyclophosphamide in the last 3 months;
  • Current smoking or past smoking in the last 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pirfenidone
All patients will receive Pirfenidone
Pirfenidone at a dose of 2403 mg/day for 50 weeks, after a 2 weeks period of titration (801 mg/day for one week then 1602 mg/day for one week).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment efficacy measured by the absolute change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
Time Frame: 52 weeks

Treatment efficacy at Week 52 measured by the absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) :

  • Patients with progressive disease will be defined as absolute decline of 10% or more in %FVC. Missing values or death will be also considered as progressive.
  • Patients with non-progressive disease will be defined as improvement or no decline in %FVC or a decline of %FVC<10%.
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: 56 weeks corresponding to 28 days after the last dose of study drug

Safety parameters reported in the period from baseline to 28 days after the last dose of the study drug:

  • Treatment-emergent AEs
  • Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
  • Treatment emergent Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)
  • Treatment-emergent treatment-related AEs
  • Treatment-emergent treatment-related SAEs
  • Treatment emergent related AESIs
  • AEs leading to early discontinuation of study treatment
  • Treatment-emergent deaths
  • Cause of death
  • Treatment-emergent changes in clinical laboratory findings
  • Vital signs
56 weeks corresponding to 28 days after the last dose of study drug
Treatment efficacy measured by the absolute change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
Time Frame: 24 weeks

Treatment efficacy at Week 24 measured by the absolute change from baseline to Week 24 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) :

  • Patients with progressive disease will be defined as absolute decline of 10% or more in %FVC. Missing values or death will be also considered as progressive.
  • Patients with non-progressive disease will be defined as improvement or no decline in %FVC or a decline of %FVC<10%.
24 weeks
Relative change in in percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Relative change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
52 weeks
Absolute change in in percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Relative and absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
52 weeks
Relative change in in percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Relative and absolute change from baseline to Week 24 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
24 weeks
Absolute change in in percent predicted forced vital capacity
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Relative and absolute change from baseline to Week 24 in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC)
24 weeks
Six minute walk test (6MWT) distance
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 52 in the six minute walk test (6MWT) distance
52 weeks
Six minute walk test (6MWT) distance
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 24 in the six minute walk test (6MWT) distance
24 weeks
Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (%DLCO)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 52 in the percent predicted Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (%DLCO)
52 weeks
Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (%DLCO)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 24 in the percent predicted Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (%DLCO)
24 weeks
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Progression-free survival defined as the time to the first occurrence of any one of the following: a confirmed decrease of 10 percentage points or more in %FVC, a confirmed decrease of 15 percentage points or more in %DLCO, or death.
52 weeks
Dyspnea
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 52 in dyspnea as measured by the New York Heart Association classification, the modified Borg scale and by the Saint-George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).
52 weeks
Chest CT-scan
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Change in Chest-CT scan abnormalities at Week 52 (evaluated after a centralized blinded review of the chest CT-scans).
52 weeks
Quality of Life assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Quality of Life assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan London, MD, Cochin Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Pirfenidone

3
Subscribe