Mind-Body Walking Exercise for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

December 24, 2017 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

The Physiological and Psychological Effect of Mind-Body Walking Exercise for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Mind-body exercise improves symptom of negative moods, dyspnea and quality of life in chronic diseases, but these improvements for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are unproven. This study aims to examine the effects of dyspnea, exercise capacity, heart rate variability(HRV), anxiety, depression, interoceptive awareness, quality of life(QoL) in patients with COPD across a three-month mind-body exercise program.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease characterized by airflow limitation, has a high prevalence of morbidity and mortality, and results in negative physical, psychological, and quality of life (QoL) impacts. Patients with COPD typically experience dyspnea, exercise intolerance, autonomic dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and poor QoL. Mind-body intervention with walking, breathing, and mindfulness is beneficial for the health of patients with COPD. However, the result of mind-body walking intervention for patients with COPD is not clear. Thus, this study will evaluate the effects of mind-body walking exercise (MBWE) on the physical psychological wellbeing and QoL of patients with COPD.

This study will be a randomized controlled trial. Data will collect from the pulmonary clinics of a medical center in northern Taiwan. The participants will recruit and randomly assign into the MBWE group or the control group. Participants in the control group will receive their usual care. Participants in the MBWE group will receive not only their usual care but also a MBWE program, consisting of walking, breathing, and mindfulness activities, for 30 min per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks. Data will collect at baseline and follow up on week 4 (WK 4), week 8 (WK 8), and week 12 (WK12). The primary outcome is dyspnea using modified Borg scale. The secondary outcomes are dyspnea in daily life using modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), exercise capacity using six minute walk distance (6MWD), Heart rate variability (HRV), anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS), interoceptive awareness using the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness- Chinese version (MAIA-C), QoL using COPD Assessment Tes (CAT). The independent t-test and Chi-square test were used to examine the homogeneity of the demographic characteristics of two groups. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the data from repeated measurements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1.mild to severe COPD

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients visited the emergency room or were hospitalized previous month;
  2. Long-term oxygen therapy;
  3. Atrial fibrillation;
  4. Severe cognitive impairment;
  5. Great than class II heart failure as defined by the New York Heart Association functional classification in previous six months;
  6. Pacemaker were excluded;
  7. Received cancer treatment
  8. Participated in other exercise trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mind-Body Walking
breathing, walking and meditation
walking, breathing, and mindfulness
No Intervention: Usual care
maintain their daily activity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of modified Borg scale for dyspnea level
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
The modified Borg scale is a visual tool ranging from 0 (not noticeable) to 10 (maximum dyspnea).
Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate variability (HRV)
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
An HRV monitor (8Z11, Enjoy Research Inc., Taiwan) was used. Participants were instructed to avoid caffeine or other stimulants food before the measurement and to breathe normally in a seated position at rest during the five-minute measurement. Selected parameters of HRV were standard deviation of all NN intervals (SDNN), power in low frequency range (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz), power in high frequency range (HF, 0.15-0.40 Hz) and LF/HF ratio (Camm et al., 1996). SDNN represented the autonomic function (141±39 for normal value); LF represented both vagal and sympathetic activity (1170±416 for normal value); HF represented vagal control (975±203 for normal value); and LF/HF ratio represented sympatho-vagal balance (0.5~2.5 for normal value) (Camm et al., 1996). The measurements of HRV were taken between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. to minimize the effect of circadian rhythm on heart rate measurements. The raw data of the measures were used in the study.
Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) for anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) consists seven items for anxiety and seven items for depression. Four scores (0-3) were designed for each item, with higher score indicating higher anxiety and depression. The score of anxiety or depression domain below 8 indicates no anxiety or depression.
Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
The Chinese version multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA-C) for interoceptive awareness
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
The Chinese version multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA-C) included five scales of emotional awareness, attention regulation, body listening, noticing, and self-regulation. Response was rated on six-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 5 (always), higher scores represented greater interoceptive awareness.
Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
Six-minute walk distance for exercise capacity
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) from the six-minute walk test (American Thoracic Society 2002) was tested. Participants were encouraged to walk as far as possible in six minutes along a flat straight corridor, but they could stop or slow down during the test, if necessary. Longer distances represent greater exercise capacity.
Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) for perception of dyspnea in daily life
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC has five score (0~4), with 0 of "I get breathless when strenuous exercise", and 4 of "I get breathless when dressing or leaving the house". A higher score means higher dyspnea.
Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
COPD assessment test (CAT) for quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.
COPD assessment test (CAT) composes of eight items, including the levels of cough, phlegm (mucus), chest tight, walk up a hill or one flight of stair, limited of activities at home, confident of leaving home, sleep status, and energy. Each item scores 0~5, and a total score is 0~40. A higher score means worse quality of life.
Baseline and follow up on Week 4, 8, and 12.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Feng-Lien Lin, PhD, National Taiwan University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 18, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 13, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 13, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Mind-Body Walking

Subscribe