Evaluation of the Effects of Cannabidiol (CBD) Compared to Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Alprazolam

June 13, 2018 updated by: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

A Human Abuse Potential Study to Evaluate the Subjective and Physiological Effects of Cannabidiol (CBD) Compared to Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Alprazolam in an Inpatient Setting

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the abuse potential of CBD to determine whether it should remain as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, or be recommended for decontrol.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover study that evaluates CBD in comparison with THC, alprazolam, and placebo in healthy recreational drug users.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66212
        • Debra Kelsh, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 51 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must understand and provide written informed consent prior to the initiation of any protocol-specific procedures.
  • Male or female subjects 18 to 55 years of age, inclusive.
  • Body mass index (BMI) within the range of 19.0 to 30.0 kg/m2, inclusive, and a minimum weight of at least 50.0 kg.
  • Healthy, as determined by no clinically significant medical history, physical examination,
  • 12-lead ECG, vital signs or laboratory (including hematology, clinical chemistry biochemistry, urinalysis, and serology) findings at Screening, as judged by the investigator.
  • Must be a recreational drug user, defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

    • ≥10 lifetime non-therapeutic experiences (i.e., for psychoactive effects) with CNS depressants (e.g., benzodiazepines, barbiturates, zolpidem, eszopiclone, propofol/fospropofol, gamma-hydroxy-butyrate).
    • ≥10 lifetime non-therapeutic experiences with cannabinoids (e.g., cannabis, hashish, THC, nabilone).
    • At least 3 non-therapeutic uses of a sedative, and at least 3 non-therapeutic uses of a cannabinoid, within the 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Must pass Qualification Phase eligibility criteria.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential who are not abstinent must be using and willing to continue using medically acceptable contraception throughout the trial and for 30 days after last dose. In the context of this trial, highly effective methods of contraception are defined as those, alone or in combination, that result in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly. Such methods include hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices/hormone-releasing systems, double-barrier methods, bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomized partner, or sexual abstinence. Abstinence is only acceptable as true (total) abstinence, when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient; periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
  • Non-vasectomized male subjects must agree to a highly effective method of contraception with female partner(s) of childbearing potential and may not donate sperm throughout the trial and for 90 days after the last study drug administration.
  • Able to speak, read, and understand English sufficiently to allow completion of all study assessments.
  • Must be willing and able to abide by all study requirements and restrictions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contact site directly for more information

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CBD (500 mg)
CBD (500 mg) capsule by mouth one time during the 18 day treatment period
THC capsule
Alpraxolam capsule
Other Names:
  • Xanax
Sugar pill capsule
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Active Comparator: CBD (1000 mg)
CBD (1000 mg) capsule by mouth one time during the 18 day treatment period
THC capsule
Alpraxolam capsule
Other Names:
  • Xanax
Sugar pill capsule
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Active Comparator: THC (2.5 mg)
THC 2.5 mg capsule by mouth one time during the 18 day treatment period
Alpraxolam capsule
Other Names:
  • Xanax
Sugar pill capsule
Other Names:
  • Placebo
CBD capsule
Active Comparator: THC (30 mg)
THC 30 mg capsule by mouth one time during the 18 day treatment period
Alpraxolam capsule
Other Names:
  • Xanax
Sugar pill capsule
Other Names:
  • Placebo
CBD capsule
Active Comparator: Alprazolam
Alpraxolam 1.5 mg capsule by mouth one time during the 18 day treatment period
THC capsule
Sugar pill capsule
Other Names:
  • Placebo
CBD capsule
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Oral Capsule
Placebo capsule by mouth one time during the 18 day treatment period
THC capsule
Alpraxolam capsule
Other Names:
  • Xanax
CBD capsule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 18 days
Subjects will complete 13 scales. Each Visual Analog Scale is a self-administered assessment evaluating the subjective effects of a study agent. Subjects will be instructed to respond to the questions with regards to how they feel at that moment of the assessment on a 100 mm Likert Scale with 0 being "Not at all" and 100 being "Very" or "Extremely". All scales are unipolar or bipolar.
18 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Increased Vital Signs
Time Frame: 25 days
Number of participants with adverse events as assessed by vital signs
25 days
Incidence of Increased ECG Reading
Time Frame: 25 days
Number of participants with adverse events as assessed by ECG
25 days
Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values
Time Frame: 25 days
Number of participants with adverse events as assessed by laboratory changes
25 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Debra Kelsh, MD, Vince and Associates Clinical Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cannabis Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on THC

Subscribe