Cervical Carious Lesions Restored With Calcium Silicate Based Cement (Biodentine) Compared With Glass-ionomer Cement

January 25, 2018 updated by: Rola Abdelraheem Alhabashneh, Jordan University of Science and Technology

Gingival Health Around Cervical Carious Lesions Restored With Calcium Silicate Based Cement (Biodentine) Compared With Glass-ionomer Cement: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study will test if applying calcium silicate cements (Biodentine) to restore cervical carious lesions might adversely affect the gingival health in comparison with conventionally used tooth colored material (GIC)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study will compare two different dental materials on dental lesions near the gum line. . The study will determine if one material is more effective in gingival health, after the placement of the two different dental materials.The oral hygiene and the gingival health of the restored teeth will be evaluated clinically at 1, 3 and 6-month intervals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. good general health;
  2. good oral hygiene; and
  3. age range 18-60 years old.

Patients with the following criteria were excluded:

  1. current smokers;
  2. pregnant females;
  3. or patient with periodontal diseases; and
  4. those who had a history of poorly controlled diabetes, liver disease, malignancy, radiotherapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women
  2. Patients taking benzodiazepines, narcotics and multiple antidepressants for pain management not associated with the oral cavity
  3. Patients requiring treatment for more than 5 decayed sites, periodontal disease and root canal therapy
  4. Complicated medical history (>4 concurrent treatment for systemic diseases)
  5. Lesion >1mm below the gum line

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: GIC filling

Intervention/treatment One group will be treated with a tooth colored filling that will be placed near the gum line (Glass Ionomer).

Placebo Comparator: GIC

Participants will have a restoration placed with GIC in the lesion near the gum line. Device: GIC Application of a tooth colored filling in the cavitated dental lesion. Other Name: Resin modified glass ionomer

tooth colored filling
Experimental: Biodentine filling

Intervention/treatment The second group will be treated with Biodentine that will be placed near the gum line.Experimental: Biodentine

Participants will have a restoration placed with Biodentine in the lesion near the gum line. Device: Biodentine Application of a white colored filling in dental lesion.

White filling -Biodentine
Other Names:
  • Calcium Cilicate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Gingival index around Cervical Carious Lesions Restored with Calcium Silicate Based Cement (Biodentine™) Compared with Glass-Ionomer Cement;
Time Frame: 6 months

Gingival health will be measured using the Loe -Silness gingival scoring Index (1963) which scores gingivitis on a numerical scale according to the following criteria:

  • 0 = Absence of inflammation.
  • 1 = Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing.
  • 2 = Moderate inflammation, moderate glazing, redness, bleeding on probing.
  • 3- Severe inflammation, marked redness and hypertrophy, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous

    • Gingival index will be evaluated at four sites (mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual) on each tooth
6 months
Changes in Plaque accumulation around Cervical Carious Lesions Restored with Calcium
Time Frame: 6 months

detect plaque level around restorations Plaque index (PI) (Silness and Löe, 1964). Plaque levels was measured using the Plaque Index Silness and Loe in 1964

Score Criteria

0 No plaque

  1. A film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin and adjacent area of the tooth, which cannot be seen with the naked eye. But only by Using disclosing solution or by using probe.
  2. Moderate accumulation of deposits within the gingival pocket, on the gingival margin and/ or adjacent tooth surface, which can be seen with the naked eye.
  3. Abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin. Plaque index will be evaluated at four sites (mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual) on each tooth
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Pocket Depth around Cervical Carious Lesions Restored with Calcium
Time Frame: 6 months
Probing depths (PD) will be measured at six sites (mesial, distal, and middle sites of the buccal and lingual sides) on each tooth using a Williams periodontal probe. PD will be measured from gingival margin to the base of the pocket.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rola Al Habashneh, ABP, JUST

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 28, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingivitis

Clinical Trials on GIC

Subscribe