LCI-GER-NOS-TAB-001: Tablet for Geriatric Assessment

August 5, 2022 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

LCI-GER-NOS-TAB-001: Pilot Study of a Tablet to Administer the Cancer-Specific Geriatric Assessment (CSGA) in Geriatric Patients With Cancer

The Self Geriatric Assessment Measure [SGAM] is based on a standard diagnostic tool used to evaluate geriatric cancer patients in order to determine the appropriateness of cancer directed therapy at LCI. This questionnaire has sections that matches portions of a self-administered geriatric assessment in patients aged 70 or older with malignancy. The prolonged duration of time needed to complete the assessment makes its performance less feasible in standard practice settings.

In previously published studies the Cancer Specific Geriatric Assessment (CSGA) has been provided both via written questionnaire and by personal computer in subjects 70 years of age or older. With improvements in technology, the goal is to evaluate the feasibility of administering the SGAM via an iPad tablet and compare results to both gold standard paper format and prior desktop computer data.

This study proposes the use of an iPad tablet to administer the SGAM may help:

Improve the completion rate of the SGAM assessment Reduction in the time of completion Improvement in the accuracy of reporting

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Objective

Assess and compare the proportions of subjects completing, defined as recording responses for at least 70% of actionable questions of the Self Geriatric Assessment Measure (SGAM) in subjects aged 70 years or older with malignancy using an iPad tablet versus written questionnaire.

Secondary Objectives

To assess and compare the proportions of subjects completing the SGAM without assistance using an iPad tablet versus written questionnaire.

To evaluate and compare the total times of interaction with the SGAM using an iPad tablet versus written questionnaire in both all evaluable subjects and the subset of evaluable subjects completing the SGAM.

To evaluate and compare the distributions of percentages of recorded responses on actionable questions (from 0% to 100%) on the SGAM using an iPad tablet versus written questionnaire in both all evaluable subjects and the subset of evaluable subjects completing the SGAM.

To describe the rate of technical issues experienced by iPad survey users.

To assess and compare the completion rates and times to completion of the gold standard written format.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

89

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
        • Levine Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria:

  • At least 70 years of age
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed malignancy within the past 1 year
  • Ability to read and understand English
  • Willingness to complete either tablet or paper based assessment independently and without assistance from caregiver, if applicable
  • Willingness and ability to understand and sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects must not meet any of the following criteria:

  • Any prior history of whole brain radiation therapy for known brain metastasis
  • Known cerebrovascular event within the last 4 weeks from enrollment
  • Known to be legally blind or has a history of severe hearing loss that could impair ability to complete questionnaire in the opinion of the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
iPad administration of Self Geriatric Assessment Measure (SGAM)
Self Geriatric Assessment Measure
Active Comparator: 2
Paper survey administration of Self Geriatric Assessment Measure (SGAM)
Self Geriatric Assessment Measure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survey completion rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Assess and compare the proportions of subjects completing, defined as recording responses for at least 70% of actionable questions of the SGAM in subjects aged 70 years or older with malignancy using an iPad tablet versus written questionnaire.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of survey completion without assistance
Time Frame: 12 months
To assess and compare the proportions of subjects completing the SGAM without assistance using an iPad tablet versus written questionnaire.
12 months
Total time of interaction with iPad survey
Time Frame: 12 months
To evaluate and compare the total times of interaction with the SGAM using an iPad tablet versus written questionnaire in both all evaluable subjects and the subset of evaluable subjects completing the SGAM.
12 months
Percentage of recorded responses
Time Frame: 12 months
To evaluate and compare the distributions of percentages of recorded responses on actionable questions (from 0% to 100%) on the SGAM using an iPad tablet versus written questionnaire in both all evaluable subjects and the subset of evaluable subjects completing the SGAM.
12 months
Rate of technical issues within iPad group
Time Frame: 12 months
To describe the rate of technical issues experienced by iPad survey users.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Haggstrom, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LCI-GER-NOS-TAB-001
  • 00023842 (Other Identifier: Advarra IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Self Geriatric Assessment Measure (SGAM)

Clinical Trials on Self Geriatric Assessment Measure (SGAM)

3
Subscribe