Improving Communication in Older Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers (COACH)

Improving Communication for Cancer Treatment: Addressing Concerns of Older Cancer Patients and Caregivers

Over 60% of cancers occur in older persons, and the number of older persons with cancer is expected to grow as the population ages. Oncology clinical trials have traditionally excluded older patients with advanced cancer and chronic health conditions. In this context, where data is limited and risk from treatment is high, older patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers must understand how cancer treatment can affect quality of life in light of underlying health status. Better communication about age-related health conditions between oncologists, older patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers may improve decision-making for cancer treatment and quality of life. A geriatric assessment (GA), a validated set of patient-centered outcomes, has been shown to identify concerns (e.g., function, cognition) important to older persons with cancer and their caregivers. In this cluster randomized clinical trial we examined whether providing a web-generated GA summary with targeted recommendations to older patients with advanced cancer, their caregivers, and their oncologists can improve communication about age-related concerns that could affect efficacy and tolerance of cancer treatment. We also determined whether the intervention improves patient-reported quality of life and patient and caregiver satisfaction.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Lymphoma; Adult Solid Neoplasm
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Geriatric Assessment Summary; Behavioral: Geriatric Assessment Targeted Recommendations; Behavioral: Geriatric Assessment (GA)

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

I. Primary Aim - Direct Communication about Age-related Concerns: To determine if providing GA summary plus GA-driven recommendations to patients, their caregivers, and oncology physicians increases discussions about age-related issues during clinic consultation. [Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) specified]

II. Primary Aim - Patient Satisfaction with Communication about Age-related Concerns: To determine if providing geriatric assessment (GA) summary plus GA-driven recommendations to patients, their caregivers and oncology physicians improves patient satisfaction with communication with the oncology physician regarding age-related concerns. [National Cancer Institute (NCI) specified]

III. Secondary Aim - To determine whether initially providing patients, their caregivers, and oncology physicians with GA summary plus GA-driven recommendations prior to their treatment influences quality of life of older patients receiving treatment and their caregivers.

IV. Secondary Aim - To determine whether providing patients, their caregivers, and oncology physicians with GA summary plus GA-driven recommendations influences caregiver satisfaction with communication about age-related issues.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

Arm I: At the first study visit with their oncologist, patients and their caregivers (if participating) complete the GA and receive the GA summary plus GA targeted recommendations which is provided to the oncology team to discuss and implement if they so choose.

Arm II: At the first study visit with their oncologist, patients and their caregivers (if participating) complete the GA (no GA summary or recommendations are provided).

Patients are followed at 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Survival data will be collected at 1 year after enrollment.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 546
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
      • City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Delaware
    • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19713
      • Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP
  • Hawaii
    • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96813
      • Hawaii
  • Illinois
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
      • University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Decatur, Illinois, United States, 62526
      • Heartland NCORP
  • Kansas
    • Prairie Village, Kansas, United States, 66208
      • Kansas City NCORP
    • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214
      • Wichita NCORP
  • Michigan
    • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48106
      • Michigan Cancer Research Consortium
  • Minnesota
    • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55426
      • Metro-Minnesota NCORP
  • Nevada
    • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89106
      • Nevada NCORP
  • New York
    • Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
      • Northwell Health
    • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
      • University of Rochester
  • North Carolina
    • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27104
      • Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium
  • Ohio
    • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43215
      • Columbus NCORP
  • Oregon
    • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97213
      • Pacific Cancer Research Consortium Ncorp
  • Pennsylvania
    • Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
      • Geisinger Cancer Institute NCORP
  • South Carolina
    • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
      • Greenville NCORP
  • Wisconsin
    • Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States, 54449
      • WiNCORP
    • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
      • Aurora NCORP

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 70 years and older (Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Patients

• Male or female 70 years of age or older
• Diagnosis of an advanced solid tumor malignancy (advanced cancer) or lymphoma. In most situations, this would be a stage IV cancer. A patient with a diagnosis of stage III cancer or lymphoma is eligible if cure is not possible or anticipated. Clinical staging without pathological confirmation of advanced disease is allowed.
• Must be considering or currently receiving any kind of cancer treatment (any line), including but not limited to hormonal treatment, chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, or targeted therapy. Patients who are considering therapy are eligible even if they ultimately choose not to be on therapy. Patients with a history of any previous cancer treatment, including radiation and/or surgery are eligible. A patient may also be enrolled on a treatment trial and participate in this study, if all other inclusion and exclusion criteria are met.
• Have at least one geriatric assessment domain meet the cut-off score for impairment other than polypharmacy.
• Have visits planned with the oncology physician for at least 3 months and be willing to come in for study visits.
• Able to provide informed consent or, if the oncology physician determines the patient to not have decision-making capacity, a patient-designated health care proxy (per institutional policies) must sign consent by the baseline visit.
• Subject has adequate understanding of the English language because not all GA measures have been validated in other languages.

Exclusion Criteria for Patients

• Have surgery planned within 3 months of consent. Patients who have previously received surgery are eligible.
• Have already made a decision to not undergo any cancer treatment (e.g., being followed in best supportive care or hospice).

Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers

• Selected by the patient when asked if there is a "family member, partner, friend or caregiver [age 21 or older] with whom you discuss or who can be helpful in health-related matters;" patients who cannot identify such a person ("caregiver") can be eligible for the study. A caregiver need not be someone who lives with the patient or provides direct hands-on care. A caregiver can be any person who provides support (in any way) to the patient.
• If a health care proxy signs consent for or with a patient, and wants to participate in the caregiver portion of the study, this same person will always be the caregiver selected. If a health care proxy does not want to enroll as a caregiver in the study or, if enrolled, chooses to stop their own participation in the caregiver portion of the study, but is able to assist the patient in completing the study, the patient can still participate. In other words, the health care proxy can choose NOT to participate in the caregiver portion of the study. This does not preclude the patient from participating in the patient portion of the study with the health care proxy's assistance.

Exclusion Criteria for Caregivers

-Caregivers unable to understand the consent form due to cognitive, health, or sensory impairment will be excluded.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I: Geriatric Assessment Intervention; At the first study visit with their oncologist, patients and their caregivers (if participating) complete the GA and receive the intervention; GA summary plus GA targeted recommendations which is provided to the oncology team to discuss and implement if they so choose.	Behavioral: Geriatric Assessment Summary; Complete summary of results from the Geriatric Assessment; Behavioral: Geriatric Assessment Targeted Recommendations; Recommendations are made based on areas patients were impaired in on the Geriatric Assessment. They include referrals, tests, medication review, instructions, and support services. The choice of which recommendation to implement is left to the discretion of the physician. Treatment modifications; Behavioral: Geriatric Assessment (GA); A GA measures the issues important to older patients, including function, psychological status, cognitive abilities, social support, and the impact of medical problems on quality of life.
Active Comparator: Arm II: Usual Care; At the first study visit with their oncologist, patients and their caregivers (if participating) complete the GA (no GA summary or recommendations are provided).	Behavioral: Geriatric Assessment (GA); A GA measures the issues important to older patients, including function, psychological status, cognitive abilities, social support, and the impact of medical problems on quality of life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Direct Communication About Age-related Concerns: Number of Discussions Related to the Geriatric Assessment That Occur in the Clinic Visit Between the Patient, Oncology Physician, and Caregiver. [Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Specified]	A geriatric assessment (GA), a validated set of patient-centered outcomes, has been shown to identify concerns (e.g., function, cognition) important to older persons with cancer and their caregivers. The geriatric assessment was used to define which age related topics discussed between patients and providers would be coded. We will apply linear mixed model methodology. The total number of conversations will be the response, and the arm will be the fixed effect. Estimation will be performed using Restricted Maximum Likelihood, and the null hypothesis of zero mean difference between arms will be tested using a F test. The specific NCORP practice site differences will be assessed graphically using Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (BLUP) of the mean response for each NCORP.	Baseline
Patient Satisfaction With Communication About Age-related Concerns: Measured by Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ). [NCI Specified]	Will apply linear mixed model methodology. The total HCCQ scores will be the response, and the arm will be the fixed effect. HCCQ contains 7 questions, scale: 0-28. The higher the score the more satisfied the patients is with communication with their oncologists about age related concerns. Estimation will be performed using Restricted Maximum Likelihood, and the null hypothesis of zero mean difference between arms will be tested using a F test. The specific NCORP practice site differences will be assessed graphically using Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (BLUP) of the mean response for each NCORP.	Within 1-7 days of the baseline audio-recorded clinic consultation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Geriatric Assessment (GA) Summary and GA Targeted-recommendations Provided to Patients, Caregivers and Oncology Physicians Prior to Their Treatment Influences Quality of Life of Older Patients Receiving Treatment and Their Caregivers.	Patient Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) will be assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) measured on a 0-108 scale with higher scores indicating a better outcome. We will apply linear mixed model methodology to compare the between arm differences.	Mean score over 4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months assessments following the intervention
Geriatric Assessment (GA) Summary and GA Targeted-recommendations Provided to Patients, Caregivers and Oncology Physicians Prior to Their Treatment Influences Caregiver Satisfaction With Communication About Age-related Issues.	We will compare the effect of the intervention on caregiver satisfaction (the modified health care climate questionnaire (HCCQ)- age for the caregiver, range 0-20; higher score better outcome). We will apply linear mixed model methodology to compare between arm differences.	At 4-6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months following the intervention
Geriatric Assessment (GA) Summary and GA Targeted-recommendations Provided to Patients, Caregivers and Oncology Physicians Prior to Their Treatment Influences Quality of Life of Older Patients Receiving Treatment and Their Caregivers.	Caregiver Health Related Quality of Life (burden) will be assessed with the Caregiver Reactions Assessment (CRA- [Overall scale ranges from 1-5, better or worse outcome depending on subscale- Self Esteem Subscale higher score indicates better outcome, Disrupted Schedule subscale lower score indicates better outcome, Financial problems subscale lower score indicates better outcome, Lack of Social Support subscale lower score indicates better outcome, Health Problems subscale lower score indicates better outcome]). We will apply linear mixed model methodology to compare between arm differences	Mean 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Supriya Mohile
• Collaborators: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Supriya Mohile, University of Rochester NCORP Research Base

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Jensen-Battaglia M, Lei L, Xu H, Loh KP, Wells M, Tylock R, Ramsdale E, Kleckner AS, Mustian KM, Dunne RF, Kehoe L, Bearden J 3rd, Burnette BL, Whitehead M, Mohile SG, Wildes TM. Communication About Fall Risk in Community Oncology Practice: The Role of Geriatric Assessment. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Oct;18(10):e1630-e1640. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00173. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
• Jensen-Battaglia M, Lei L, Xu H, Kehoe L, Patil A, Loh KP, Ramsdale E, Magnuson A, Kleckner AS, Wildes TM, Lin PJ, Mustian KM, Giri G, Whitehead M, Bearden J 3rd, Burnette BL, Geer J, Mohile SG, Dunne RF. Association of Oncologist-Patient Communication With Functional Status and Physical Performance in Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e223039. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3039.
• Loh KP, Seplaki CL, Sanapala C, Yousefi-Nooraie R, Lund JL, Epstein RM, Duberstein PR, Flannery M, Culakova E, Xu H, McHugh C, Klepin HD, Lin PJ, Watson E, Grossman VA, Liu JJ, Geer J, O'Rourke MA, Mustian K, Mohile SG. Association of Prognostic Understanding With Health Care Use Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0018.
• Gilmore N, Xu H, Kehoe L, Kleckner AS, Moorthi K, Lei L, Mohamed MRS, Loh KP, Culakova E, Flannery M, Ramsdale E, Duberstein PR, Canin B, Kamen C, Giri G, Watson E, Patil A, Onitilo AA, Burnette B, Janelsins M, Mohile SG. Evaluating the association of frailty with communication about aging-related concerns between older patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists. Cancer. 2022 Mar 1;128(5):1101-1109. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34010. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
• Flannery MA, Mohile S, Culakova E, Norton S, Kamen C, Dionne-Odom JN, DiGiovanni G, Griggs L, Bradley T, Hopkins JO, Liu JJ, Loh KP. Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaires Among Older Adults with Advanced Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Feb;63(2):301-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.07.032. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
• Kleckner AS, Wells M, Kehoe LA, Gilmore NJ, Xu H, Magnuson A, Dunne RF, Jensen-Battaglia M, Mohamed MR, O'Rourke MA, Vogelzang NJ, Dib EG, Peppone LJ, Mohile SG. Using Geriatric Assessment to Guide Conversations Regarding Comorbidities Among Older Patients With Advanced Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Jan;18(1):e9-e19. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00196. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
• Xu H, Kadambi S, Mohile SG, Yang S, Kehoe LA, Wells M, Culakova E, Kamen C, Obrecht S, Mohamed M, Gilmore NJ, Magnuson A, Grossman VA, Hopkins JO, Geer J, Berenberg J, Mustian K, Cupertino A, Mohile N, Loh KP. Caregiving burden of informal caregivers of older adults with advanced cancer: The effects of rurality and education. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Sep;12(7):1015-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
• Mohile SG, Epstein RM, Hurria A, Heckler CE, Canin B, Culakova E, Duberstein P, Gilmore N, Xu H, Plumb S, Wells M, Lowenstein LM, Flannery MA, Janelsins M, Magnuson A, Loh KP, Kleckner AS, Mustian KM, Hopkins JO, Liu JJ, Geer J, Gorawara-Bhat R, Morrow GR, Dale W. Communication With Older Patients With Cancer Using Geriatric Assessment: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial From the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):196-204. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4728.
• Kehoe LA, Xu H, Duberstein P, Loh KP, Culakova E, Canin B, Hurria A, Dale W, Wells M, Gilmore N, Kleckner AS, Lund J, Kamen C, Flannery M, Hoerger M, Hopkins JO, Liu JJ, Geer J, Epstein R, Mohile SG. Quality of Life of Caregivers of Older Patients with Advanced Cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):969-977. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15862. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

Helpful Links

• Data Available: Select individual patient-level data from this trial can be requested from the NCTN/NCORP Data Archive

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 27, 2014
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 12, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 3, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 3, 2014
• First Posted (Estimated): April 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 12, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 10, 2024
• Last Verified: April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: URCC13070; UG1CA189961 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract); U10CA037420 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract); NCI-2014-00619 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program)); URCC 13070 (Other Identifier: University of Rochester); URCC-13070 (Other Identifier: CTEP); CD-12-11-4634 (Other Identifier: PCORI)