Comparison of Three Vision Therapy Approaches for Convergence Insufficiency

February 10, 2018 updated by: Zahra Rabbani Khah, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
We compared the effectiveness of three active vision therapy approaches for convergence insufficiency (CI). Patients with eligible criteria and symptomatic CI were included in a prospective study and randomly allocated into three groups. In the home-based vision orthoptic therapy (HBVOT) group, patients were trained to do the pencil push-ups procedure 15 minutes per day, five days a week. In the office-based vision orthoptic therapy (OBVOT) group, 60 minutes of orthoptic therapy using a major amblyoscope twice weekly with additional home orthoptic therapy was prescribed. For the augmented office-based vision orthoptic therapy (AOBVOT) group, orthoptic exercises using three diopter over-minus lenses and a base out prism, in addition to major amblyoscope and additional home reinforcement was prescribed in the same period of time.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

48

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 33 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients between 15 and 35 years of age who have symptomatic CI using the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) scoring system.
  • best-corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/25
  • exophoria at near at least 4 prism diopters (△) greater than at distance
  • near point of convergence more than 6.0 cm break
  • insufficient positive fusional vergence (PFV) (failing Sheard's criterion or PFV ≤ 15 △ base-out) at near distance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • amblyopia (VA worse than 20/30 in each eye), presence of manifest strabismus, history of ocular surgery, any systemic disorder, anisometropia of more than 1.5 diopter of myopia or hyperopia or significant refractive error, and nystagmus and usage of medications that may impair accommodation or convergence. ,ocular surface abnormalities or history of ocular allergy or those who had previously been treated for CI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: home-based vision orthoptic therapy (HBVOT) group
In the home-based vision orthoptic therapy (HBVOT) group, patients were trained to do the pencil push-ups procedure 15 minutes per day, five days a week
15 minutes per day, five days a week
Active Comparator: office-based vision orthoptic therapy (OBVOT) group
In the office-based vision orthoptic therapy (OBVOT) group, 60 minutes of orthoptic therapy using a major amblyoscope twice weekly with additional home orthoptic therapy was prescribed
60 minutes of orthoptic therapy using a major amblyoscope twice weekly with additional home orthoptic therapy was prescribed.
Active Comparator: augmented office-based vision orthoptic therapy (AOBVOT) group
For the augmented office-based vision orthoptic therapy (AOBVOT) group, orthoptic exercises using three diopter over-minus lenses and a base out prism, in addition to major amblyoscope and additional home reinforcement was prescribed in the same period of time.
For the augmented office-based vision orthoptic therapy (AOBVOT) group, orthoptic exercises using three diopter over-minus lenses and a base out prism, in addition to major amblyoscope and additional home reinforcement was prescribed in the same period of time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
symptomatic convergence insufficiency
Time Frame: one month
A symptomatic score was an average score of 16 or higher on the CISS(conv-insuff-sympt-scove)
one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

3
Subscribe