rTMS Combined With BWSTT in Stroke With Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training (BWSTT) After Stroke

May 3, 2023 updated by: Hui Ting Goh, Texas Woman's University

High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Combined With Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training (BWSTT) After Stroke: A Pilot Study

The study will enroll 5 individuals post-stroke to examine the feasibility and efficacy of a high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with body weight supported treadmill training.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility and efficacy of 5Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to bilateral motor areas as an adjuvant intervention to task-specific body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) in individuals with subacute stroke.

Five individuals with a diagnosis of subacute stroke will be recruited and assigned to either high frequency or sham rTMS group.Both groups will receive a comprehensive assessment of their motor function, gait performance and neurophysiological function before the training. Both groups will then go through a 10 week (24 sessions) of gait training with body weight supported treadmill. For the high frequency rTMS group, they will receive 5 Hz rTMS applied to bilateral motor areas prior to each gait training session. For the sham rTMS group, they will receive a sham stimulation prior to the gait training sessions. All participants will receive another comprehensive assessment after the training concludes. The assessor will be blinded to the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
        • Texas Woman's University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18-80 years old
  2. < 2 months post stroke at the time of enrollment
  3. first time stroke:
  4. able to walk > 25 feet with or without assistive device and with no more than moderate assistance:
  5. able to follow 1-step commands
  6. able to communicate verbally

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. severe medical problems (e.g. recent cardiac infarct, heart failure, cancer)
  2. presence of conditions that could affect gait training (e.g. amputation, severe arthritis)
  3. bilateral stroke
  4. non-ambulatory prior to stroke
  5. BMI > 40
  6. any contraindications to TMS (e.g. history of seizure, cardiac pacemaker, metal or magnetic implants)
  7. pregnant or potentially to be pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High Frequency rTMS
The High Frequency rTMS group will receive real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in 5Hz at 90% of resting motor threshold delivered to the bilateral motor areas via a figure of 8 air-filmed coil. The stimulation is structured as 24 10-second trains with a inter-train interval of 30 second.
Participants in the intervention group will receive 1200 stimuli at the intensity of 90% of resting motor threshold via an air-filmed coil placed on the vertex. The stimulation will be delivered across 24 sessions (in 10 weeks). Right after each session, participants will receive a 45-minute structured body weight supported treadmill training.
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS
The Sham rTMS group will receive the same protocol but delivered via a sham coil which generates the same auditory and cutaneous feedback as the real stimulation. However, there will be no active stimulation.
Participants in the sham group will receive the same duration of stimulation via a sham coil placed on the vertex.Right after each session, participants will receive a 45-minute structured body weight supported treadmill training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Walking Speed
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Participant's regular and fast walking speeds (in m/s) will be measured using GaitRite. A faster walking speed indicates a better gait performance.
10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Quality of life will be measure using Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). The SIS is a paper and pencil questionnaire consisting 59 items grouped into 8 domains. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale; a higher item score indicates a lower level of difficulty experienced with the item. Item scores are averaged and transformed into domain scores ranging from 0 to 100. A higher domain score indicates a lower level of difficulty. The SIS is well-validated in stroke.
10 weeks
Change in Motor Function
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Motor function will be quantified using Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is well-validated in stroke and has a total score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher total score suggests a better level of motor function.
10 weeks
Change in Cortical Excitability
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Cortical excitability will be measured using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Excitability will be quantified using motor evoked potential amplitude (in mV). A higher motor evoked potential amplitude indicates a greater level of excitability.
10 weeks
Change in Walking Endurance
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Walking endurance will be measured using Six Minute Walk Test and measured in meters. A higher score in the 6 minute walk test (in meters) indicates a better walking endurance.
10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hui-Ting Goh, Texas Woman's University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on High Frequency rTMS

3
Subscribe