Development of an Exergame to Deliver a Sustained Dose of High-Intensity Training

Development of an Exergame to Deliver a Sustained Dose of High-Intensity Training: Formative Pilot Randomized Trial

Males from areas of social deprivation within the town of Middlesbrough (UK) were targetted and recruited on to a high-intensity, exergaming intervention over a 6-week period. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to an intervention group (weekly exergaming) or control group (normal habitual lifestyle). All participants completed baseline (week 0) and follow-up (week 7) measures of metabolic health. Participants in the intervention group were invited to three sessions a week of high-intensity exergaming performed against their peers on a developed boxing game.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Metabolic Syndrome
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: High-intensity exergaming

Detailed Description

A 6-week exploratory controlled trial designed to assess the fidelity of the game in terms of delivering the intended training stimulus and to examine the effect of the intervention on selected health outcomes was conducted. As appropriate for an exploratory trial, the investigators did not conduct formal sample size estimation a priori, rather the CIs would be used to inform future trials. A targeted recruitment approach at locations predominantly attended by men may facilitate uptake of participants was used. Therefore, to maximize recruitment within the intended population, relevant gatekeepers were approached at institutions positioned within regions of social deprivation. Thus, two settings used for recruitment and the trials were a social club and mosque, both situated within deprived regions of Middlesbrough, United Kingdom (TS1 and TS4). A total of 24 males were recruited into the trial (Figure 4) using relevant gatekeepers at institutions positioned within regions of social deprivation. Two recruitment drives (October 2014 and February 2015) took place, and these involved live demonstrations of the technology followed by word-of-mouth and snowballing approaches. The exergaming system was important in this recruitment process because it provided something tangible and interesting to engage potential participants.

A third-party minimization process using baseline measures of age, waist circumference, and predicted maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) was used to remove bias in group allocation. The control group was instructed to maintain their current physical activity levels and inform the researchers should any changes arise during the intervention period. Overall retention to the intervention that encompassed baseline and follow-up measures was 87.5% (21/24).

To explore perceptions of the exergame and the HIT regime, semistructured interviews were conducted with 5 intervention participants following the 6-week training period, which were analyzed semantically. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Teesside University, United Kingdom, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Evidence recommends a minimum duration of 12 weeks for a HIT protocol to promote favorable changes in blood pressure and anthropometric measurements of obesity [35]. However, a 6-week intervention was selected, as a minimum of 13 sessions (0.16 work/rest ratio) is sufficient to elicit moderate improvements in VO2 max in sedentary individuals. Additionally, there is still ambiguity regarding the optimal work-to-rest ratio when designing HIT interventions, particularly in populations with varied age, baseline fitness, and training experience. Therefore, longer duration HIT models (1-4 min) were deemed unsuitable for the target population. Furthermore, minigames (such as the current exergame) have short life spans, where adherence to a longer intervention (eg, 12 weeks) may diminish over time and influence health outcomes. This was evident from a 12-week pilot study (unpublished data) using an exergame in the same population that saw attendance drop from 53% during week 2 to 16% during week 12.

Participants allocated to the intervention group were invited to attend three sessions of exergaming per week. At the beginning of the exergaming session, participants were required to complete a 6-min structured warm-up consisting of a series of exercises on a 210 mm step until both participants reached >70% HRmax. Session workloads with volumetric progression were set automatically once the user's identifying information was entered. The session workloads were 120-s, 150-s, and 180-s of work during weeks 1 and 2, weeks 3 and 4, and weeks 5 and 6, respectively.

To avoid staleness, the repetition lengths (10, 20, or 30-s) were randomly selected at the beginning of each round. The investigators set the work-to-rest ratio at 1:4, and thus, the respective repetitions were followed by 40, 80, or 120-s of active recovery. Participants were instructed to perform the repetitions at an intensity ≥85% HRmax. Each exergaming session took approximately 30 to 40 min to complete, including equipment set-up, warm-up with additional enjoyment, and task immersion questionnaires upon completion of the HIT bouts (not reported here). Heart rate responses were taken within repetitions and therefore, did not include any of the recovery period. This, therefore, avoided an overestimation of physiological load, which can occur when heart rate continues to rise after exercise cessation.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 24
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • South Yorkshire
    • Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, S102BP
      • Sheffield Hallam University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 55 years (ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• 'apparently healthy' according the ACSM guidelines

Exclusion Criteria:

• known presence of cardiovascular disease
• musculoskeletal injury

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention; Perform three session of high-intensity, interval training sessions per week over the 6-week intervention	Other: High-intensity exergaming; Perform high-intensity exercise whilst playing a developed exergame. A full warm-up performed prior to the session was performed (~70% HRmax). Periods of exercise were performed at an intensity >85% HRmax for periods of 10, 20 and 30s, interspersed with periods of rest, for a total of 2-3 minutes per session. Heart rate was monitored throughout the intervention.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control; Continue with their normal habitual lifestyle over the 6-week intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Cardiorespiratory fitness	Predicted VO2max was obtained by performing a submaximal 8-min ramped step test. Heart rate response (Polar T34; PolarElectro OY, Kempele, Finland) and simultaneous breath-by-breath expired gas were collected using a portable indirect calorimeter (Cosmed K4 b2; Rome, Italy), calibrated per the manufacturer's guidelines. Individual HRmax was estimated and plotted against VO2 data for the determination of predicted VO2max (reported in ml.kg.min-1).	Six-weeks
Blood pressure	Blood pressure was collected on the left arm positioned at heart height with the subjects in a seated position by an automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor (Omron MX13). Measures were made at least three times at 3-min intervals, where an average of the two lowest measures was used for analysis (reported in mm/Hg).	Six-weeks
Waist circumference	Waist circumference was measured using the World Health Organization guidelines (reported in cm).	Six-weeks
Body Mass	Body mass was measured using a portable set of electronic scales (Seca, Birmingham, UK) and reported the neasrest 0.1kg.	Six-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Within-participant heart rate	To observe the within-participant heart rate responses to the 10, 20 and 30s high-intensity repetitions across the intervention (reported as percentage of individual heart rate maximum (%).	Six-weeks
Between-participant heart rate	To observe the between-participant heart rate responses to the 10, 20 and 30s high-intensity repetitions across the intervention (reported as percentage of individual heart rate maximum (%).	Six-weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Perceptions of the high-intensity exergame	Semistructured interviews were conducted with intervention participants following the 6-week training period to explore the feasability of the intervention and developed exergame	Six-weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Sheffield Hallam University
• Collaborators: Newcastle University; Teesside University; Northumbria University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• McBain T, Weston M, Crawshaw P, Haighton C, Spears I. Development of an Exergame to Deliver a Sustained Dose of High-Intensity Training: Formative Pilot Randomized Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2018 Mar 27;6(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/games.7758.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): November 1, 2014
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): April 30, 2015
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): April 30, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 13, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 19, 2018
• First Posted (ACTUAL): March 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): March 26, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 19, 2018
• Last Verified: March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: metabolic syndrome; heart rate; boxing; video games; high-intensity interval training
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Metabolic Diseases; Insulin Resistance; Hyperinsulinism; Metabolic Syndrome
• Other Study ID Numbers: SheffieldHU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: There is no plan to share IPD from the current study.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No