Safety/Efficacy of Nepafenac Punctal Plug Delivery System Compared to Placebo to Control Ocular Pain/Inflammation After Cataract

September 16, 2021 updated by: Mati Therapeutics Inc.

Clinical Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of a Nepafenac Punctal Plug Delivery System (N-PPDS) Compared With Placebo Punctal Plug Delivery System (p-PPDS) in Controlling Post-Operative Ocular Pain and Inflammation After Routine Unilateral Cataract Surgery

This is a Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, parallel-arm, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. One (1) to 2 days prior to their scheduled cataract surgery, each study subject will be randomized (2:1) in to one of two treatment groups: N-PPDS or p-PPDS, which are inserted in the lower punctum of the subject's scheduled surgical eye. All plugs will remain in the study subject's lower punctum for a period of 2 weeks following cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, parallel-arm, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. One (1) to 2 days prior to their scheduled cataract surgery, each study subject will be randomized (2:1) in to one of two treatment groups:

Group A: A total of 50 study subjects (50 eyes) will have an N-PPDS inserted in the lower punctum of their scheduled surgical eye.

Group B: A total of 25 study subjects (25 eyes) will have a p-PPDS inserted in the lower punctum of their scheduled surgical eye.

All plugs will remain in the study subject's lower punctum for a period of 2 weeks following cataract surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Edgewood, Kentucky, United States, 41017
        • Cincinnati Eye Institute-Edgewood
    • New York
      • Garden City, New York, United States, 11530
        • Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island
    • South Carolina
      • Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
        • Kerry Solomon, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A male or female subject in good general health, ≥ 22 years of age at the time of the screening visit
  2. A subject with a cataract for which routine phacoemulsification extraction and implantation of an intraocular lens has been planned
  3. A subject has a lower puncta that can be dilated to 1.0 mm in their scheduled surgical eye

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A subject with a history of complications, adverse events, trauma or disease in the nasolacrimal area, whether or not it was due to punctal plug wear, including but not limited to dacryocystitis, inflammation or canaliculitis in either eye
  2. A subject with structural lid abnormalities (e.g., ectropion, entropion) in their schedule surgical eye
  3. A subject with a puncta >0.9 mm prior to dilation in their scheduled surgical eye
  4. A subject with any signs of intraocular inflammation (cells/flare) in either eye at the screening visit
  5. A subject with a known sensitivity to nepafenac or any inactive ingredient of the punctum plug, silicone, fluorescein, topical anesthetic, or any other products required for study procedures or cataract surgery
  6. A subject with a history of chronic/recurrent inflammatory eye disease (e.g., scleritis, uveitis, herpes keratitis) in either eye

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Nepafenac PPDS
N-PPDS (Nepafenac Punctal Plug Deliver System) is an L-shaped, silicone punctal plug with a drug eluting core that contains nepafenac (active)
A punctal plug delivery system (PPDS) is being developed as a device that can deliver a sustained release of a drug to a specific eye. The PPDS is made up of a medical grade silicone punctal plug which holds an insert (core) that contains nepafenac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo PPDS
p-PPDS (placebo Punctal Plug Delivery System) is an L-shaped, silicone punctal plug with a drug insert that contains no active ingredient (placebo).
A punctal plug delivery system (PPDS) is being developed as a device that can deliver a sustained release of a drug to a specific eye. The PPDS is made up of a medical grade silicone punctal plug which holds an insert (core) that does not contain nepafenac.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Pain
Time Frame: day 14
Assessment of pain in subjects as measured by a scale of 0 - 5. Post-op pain scale: 0 represents absence of pain and 5 represents a definite, continuous unbearable ocular or periocular pain.
day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Anterior Chamber Cells
Time Frame: day 14
Anterior chamber cells are assessed using a scale of 0 - 4 with 0 representing no cells seen and 4 representing >30 cells seen.
day 14
Assessment of Flare
Time Frame: day 14
Anterior chamber flare is assessed using a scale of 0 - 4 with 0 representing no Tyndall effect and 4 representing Tyndall effect in anterior chamber is very intense
day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Deepank Utkhede, Mati Therapeutics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 5, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 17, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 17, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Nepafenac PPDS

3
Subscribe