The Effect of Metoprolol in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy. (TEMPO)

March 24, 2021 updated by: Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen

The Effect of Metoprolol on Myocardial Function, Perfusion, Hemodynamics and Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients often develop disabling symptoms of heart failure. Current treatment strategies are predicated on the empirical use of long-standing drugs, such as beta-adrenergics, although with little evidence supporting their clinical benefit in this disease. Metoprolol is currently the most widely used beta-blocker in symptomatic HOCM patients, but a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, that looks at the effect in HOCM patients has never been conducted. No studies of HOCM combine invasive pressure measurement with exercise and echocardiography. All previous studies, both invasive and echocardiographic, have been conducted during rest, and not during exercise. Symptoms of HOCM patients are function-related, and exercise testing is essential to assess the condition and the effect of drugs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by an increase in left-ventricular wall thickness, typically localized at the interventricular septum. The hypertrophy can increase to an extend that causes a dynamic obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOTO); these patients have hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Due to the obstruction, patients develop high interventricular pressure gradients, which may overtime become detrimental to the left ventricular function.

HOCM patients often develop disabling symptoms of heart failure. Current treatment strategies are predicated on the empirical use of long-standing drugs, such as beta-adrenergics, although with little evidence supporting their clinical benefit in this disease. Metoprolol is currently the most widely used beta-blocker in symptomatic HOCM patients, but a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, that looks at the effect in HOCM patients has never been conducted. No studies of HOCM combine invasive pressure measurement with exercise and echocardiography. All previous studies, both invasive and echocardiographic, have been conducted during rest, and not during exercise. Symptoms of HOCM patients are function-related, and exercise testing is essential to assess the condition and the effect of drugs.

Objective The investigators wants to quantify the effects of metoprolol on myocardial function and perfusion, hemodynamics and heart failure symptoms in patients with HOCM.

Hypotheses

Primary

• Metoprolol treatment reduces ∆ pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (rest-exercise)

Secondary

  • Metoprolol treatment reduces PCWP at rest
  • Metoprolol treatment increases maximal oxygen consumption (VO2-max) .
  • Metoprolol treatment reduces LVOT gradient during exercise
  • Metoprolol treatment increases the coronary flow reserve
  • Metoprolol treatment decrease External Work
  • Metoprolol treatment reduces heart failure symptoms, estimated by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire

Design and methods

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study, anticipated to examine 32 patients with HOCM both during treatment with metoprolol and placebo.

Patients will be examined in a set-up of simultaneous 1) right heart catheterization 2) cardiopulmonary exercise test and 3) transthoracic echocardiography. The set-up allows the investigators to evaluate the hemodynamic values during rest and maximum exercise.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Danmark
      • Aarhus N, Danmark, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Cardiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Wall thickness ≥ 15 mm in one or more myocardial segments that is not explained by loading conditions.
  • LVOT gradient > 30 mmHg at rest and/or > 50 mmHg at Valsalva's maneuver or exercise
  • New York Heart Association Functional class (NYHA) ≥ II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Known allergy to trial medicine
  • Contraindications to beta-blocker treatment
  • Contraindications to Magnetic resonans scan, including contraindication to the contrast agent gadolinium.
  • Female patients who are pregnant (positive plasma-HCG), breastfeeding or of child-bearing potential while not practicing effective chemical contraceptive hormones.
  • In case of patients having a pacemaker, they may not be pace-dependent.
  • Treatment with Amiodarone
  • Atrial fibrillation/flutter at the time of examination
  • Bradycardia < 49 beats/min
  • Systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg
  • Trifascicular block
  • Previous transcoronary ablation of septum hypertrophy (TASH) or myectomy
  • Current abuse of alcohol and/or drugs
  • Significant co-morbidity or issues that makes the patient unsuitable for participation, judged by the investigator
  • Patients who cannot give valid consent (e.g. mental illness or dementia)
  • Patients who do not understand danish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Metoprolol Succinate
Metoprololsuccinat
  1. week: uptitration with 50 mg capsules per day, until maximum dosage of 150 mg´s/day.
  2. week: steady state treatment with the maximum tolerated dose of the 1.week.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo oral capsule
Placebo
  1. week: uptitration with 1 capsule per day, until maximum tolerated dosage of 3 capsules/day.
  2. week: steady state treatment with the maximum tolerated dose of the 1. week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
∆Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (rest-exercise)
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Changes in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in mmHg from rest to exercise, measured during right heart catheterization
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at rest
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Changes in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in mmHg during rest, measured during right heart catheterization
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
VO2-max
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Changes in maximal oxygen consumption (L/min) measured during cardiopulmonary exercise test
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
LVOT gradient during maximum exercise
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Changes of the LVOT gradient during maximum exercise, measured in mmHg during 2D echocardiography
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Coronary flow reserve
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Changes in the ratio of maximum coronary blood flow (induced by infusion of adenosin) to resting coronary blood flow, estimated by 2D doppler echocardiography
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Changes in level of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (ng/L) in blood sample
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Changes of symptoms and quality of life with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms
Changes of symptoms and quality of life with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire assessed by clinical evaluation
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 2 weeks of treatment in both treatment arms

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, MD, Aa
  • Study Director: Morten Kvistholm Jensen, MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Cardiology
  • Study Director: Torsten Bloch Rasmussen, MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Cardiology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Clinical Trials on Metoprolol Succinate

Subscribe