The Effects of a Low Carbohydrate, Non-Ketogenic Diet Versus Standard Diabetes Diet on Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes (T1DLoCHO)

January 9, 2020 updated by: University of Oklahoma
This randomized, crossover nutrition intervention seeks to examine the effects of a non-ketogenic low carbohydrate (CHO) diet (60-80g per day) on glycemic control, lipids, and markers on inflammation in individuals with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). This study will be used to inform clinical practice, especially in teaching medical nutrition therapy to new-onset diabetes patients and those struggling with glycemic control and hyperlipidemia. At this time, no evidenced-based universal recommendations from randomized controlled trials exist to support low carbohydrate dietary patterns as a front-line approach in individuals with T1D. The investigators hypothesize a diet consisting of 60-80 g carbohydrate diet will result in greater improvement in glycemic control compared to a 50% carbohydrate diet in patients with Type 1 diabetes over 12 weeks in the outpatient setting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is marked by total insulin dependence with challenges regarding glycemic control and concomitant sequela. While standard of care medical nutrition therapy for this disease centers on matching carbohydrate to insulin at meals, recent literature and clinical reports have shown superior glycemic control and cardiovascular measures with lower carbohydrate dietary patterns (<130g/day) as compared to the standard American MyPlate (50% total calories as carbohydrate) approach. Diabetes management has evolved tremendously in the last twenty years with the development of sophisticated insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors; but, glycemic control is still dependent on quantification of carbohydrate, imperfect in the real-world setting. Due to inherent error in carbohydrate counting, the investigators propose that less carbohydrate will produce better glycemic control by minimizing error and subsequent variation in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

There has long been a movement in the medical community to prescribe low carbohydrate diets under the premise of "less carbohydrate, less insulin, less glycemic variation". This strategy centers on "the law of small numbers", a calculus principle describing magnitude of variation in the output (glycemic variation) as the function of input size (CHO + insulin). Carbohydrate counting tends to result in ~50% error while there is ~30% variation in insulin action, making exactitude impossible. However, low CHO diets tend to provide >40% energy from fat due to the macronutrient distribution. With innate risk of cardiovascular disease in T1D, standard of care has supported restriction of total fat consumption, especially saturated fat, in effort to control cholesterol. While the American Diabetes Association recognizes that dietary fat is a controversial and complex issue, eliminating trans-fats is the only consensus point across the field. To date, most low CHO diet studies in both T1D and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) have not shown adverse effects on lipids and tend to show decreases in triglycerides and either no change or increases in HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74135
        • University of Oklahoma Harold Hamm Diabetes Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed Type 1 diabetes for > 1 year confirmed by physician diagnosis
  • HbA1c >5.9% and <10%;
  • Confirmation of minimum three blood glucose tests per day (meter download or chart record)
  • Use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy (CSII) or multiple daily injection (MDI) intensive insulin therapy
  • No change in insulin therapy type (CSII or MDI) in last 2 months or longer
  • Willingness to count carbohydrate and use bolus calculator on insulin pump during the intervention periods
  • Willingness to wear a 7 day CGM at three different time points during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant, are exclusively breastfeeding, or who are not using adequate contraceptive methods
  • Use of corticosteroids during or within 30 days prior to the intervention periods
  • Macroalbuminuria
  • Active proliferative retinopathy combined with an HbA1c ≥ 9%
  • Known or suspected alcohol or drug abuse
  • Other concomitant medical or psychological condition that according to the investigator's assessment makes the patient unsuitable for study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Low carbohydrate diet
60-80 g total carbohydrate per day
Active Comparator: Experimental: Standard of care diet
> 150 g total carbohydrate per day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time in Range
Time Frame: 5 days of worn CGM during each intervention
Difference in time spent with glucose values between 70-180 mg/dL assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
5 days of worn CGM during each intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Glucose
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Difference in mean glucose values assessed by CGM
Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Standard deviation of glucose
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Difference in standard deviation of glucose values assessed by CGM
Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Difference in mean amplitude of glycemic excursions assessed by CGM
Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Time in hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Difference in time spent with glucose values <70 mg/dL; between 55-70 mg/dL; and <55 mg/dL
Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Time in hyperglycemia
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Difference in time spent with glucose values >180 mg/dL
Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Difference in change in hemoglobin A1c
Baseline to 12 weeks
Coefficient of Variation
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Estimate of glucose variability calculated by dividing the standard deviation by average glucose
Baseline to 12 weeks (1 week worn CGM data)
Severe hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Difference in number of severe hypoglycemia episodes (glucagon or IV dextrose administration)
Baseline to 12 weeks
Total daily insulin dose
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Difference in total daily insulin dose
Baseline to 12 weeks
Total daily basal insulin 24 hour
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Difference in total daily basal insulin in 24 hours
Baseline to 12 weeks
Total daily bolus insulin 24 hour
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Difference in total daily bolus insulin in 24 hours
Baseline to 12 weeks
Body weight
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in body weight
Baseline to 12 weeks
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in BMI
Baseline to 12 weeks
Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in systolic BP
Baseline to 12 weeks
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in diastolic BP
Baseline to 12 weeks
Pulse, per minute
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in pulse
Baseline to 12 weeks
Energy Intake (kcal/day)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in energy intake
Baseline to 12 weeks
Daily carbohydrate intake (total carbohydrate, g/day)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in carbohydrate intake
Baseline to 12 weeks
Percent energy intake as Carbohydrate
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in % carbohydrate intake
Baseline to 12 weeks
Daily protein intake (total protein, g/day) and Daily fat intake (total fat, g/day)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in protein intake
Baseline to 12 weeks
Fat quality intake (% total fat as monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, saturated, omega-3)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in fat quality
Baseline to 12 weeks
Standard Lipid Panel
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in (Total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol-calculated, triglycerides; mg/dL)
Baseline to 12 weeks
LDL-P (nmol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in LDL-P
Baseline to 12 weeks
HDL-P (umol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in HDL-P
Baseline to 12 weeks
VLDL-P
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in VLDL-P (nmol/L)
Baseline to 12 weeks
LDL size
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in LDL size (nm)
Baseline to 12 weeks
HDL size
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in HDL size (nm)
Baseline to 12 weeks
VLDL size
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in VLDL size (nm)
Baseline to 12 weeks
High-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in hs-CRP
Baseline to 12 weeks
Plasma lipopolysaccharide
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Surrogate marker for inflammation
Baseline to 12 weeks
Serum Ketones (beta-hydroxybutyrate)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
beta-hydroxybutyrate (mmol/L)
Baseline to 12 weeks
Type 1 Diabetes Nutrition Knowledge Survey
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 33 (end of study)
Validated nutrition knowledge survey (nutrition label reading, carbohydrate counting)
Baseline to Week 33 (end of study)
Diet Quality
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Minerals, Vitamins, Dietary Fiber amounts compared to DRIs for age, ascertained by 3 day 24 hour food logs
Baseline to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christina M Crowder, RDN, CNSC, LD, University of Oklahoma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Clinical Trials on Low carbohydrate diet

Subscribe