Additional Gluteal Control Training for Low Back Pain With Functional Leg Length Inequality

September 17, 2019 updated by: Yi-Fen Shih, National Yang Ming University

Additional Gluteal Control Training for Low Back Pain With Functional Leg Length Inequality: A Ramdomized Controlled Trail

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. A variety of exercise interventions which were designed as randomized control trails (RCTs) have been studied and shown effectiveness in improving pain and disability. These exercises typically focus on the abdominal and back musculature strength. However, many LBP patients did not show any improvement in their symptom after they carry out those exercise programs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. A variety of exercise interventions which were designed as randomized control trails (RCTs) have been studied and shown effectiveness in improving pain and disability. These exercises typically focus on the abdominal and back musculature strength. However, many LBP patients did not show any improvement in their symptom after they carry out those exercise programs. Some authors consider that this type of low back pain may be caused by leg length inequality (LLI) in these patients, which resulted from poor gluteal neuromuscular control or muscles' imbalance.

In consideration of few studies have been done for investigating the effects of gluteal muscles control training in LBP. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of additional gluteal muscles control training on improving functional LLI in patients with LBP. We hypothesized that gluteal muscle control training would be more effective in self-reported pain, and their functional disability would be improve after 6-week training program than control training group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11221
        • National Yang Ming University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • non-specific LBP (from inferior rib margin to the gluteal fold)
  • more than 3 months
  • Visual Analog Scale ≧5 (in past one month)
  • pelvic innominate rotation (anterior rotation in dominant side)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of fracture or surgery
  • congenital anomalies in the spine, pelvis, or lower limbs
  • recent trauma, tumor, pregnancy or scoliosis
  • lower extremity paresthesia, unknown weakness
  • bowel and bladder dysfunction
  • predominant lower extremity pain with standing
  • presence of system illness, no reasoning weight loss, predominant night pain
  • specific sacroiliac joint dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GC group
It mainly involve core stability exercise, stretching exercise and gluteal control training. All of above will be arranged 3 times a week for a total 6 weeks.
  1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times

    1. supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction.
    2. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees.
    3. All four position with leg raise
  2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times

    1. Hamstring
    2. Quadriceps
  3. Additional gluteal muscle control training: hold 10 s/reps, 20 reps/times 1st to 2nd:

    1. clam ex. without resistance
    2. single leg bridge with maintain bil. ASIS even level 3rd to 4th: maintain 1st to 2nd ex. with resistance 5th:
    1. maintain 3rd to 4th ex.
    2. single leg standing on rock board to maintain balance 6th:
    1. maintain 5th ex.
    2. lunge ex. without hip internal rotation
Other Names:
  • Additional gluteal muscle control training
Experimental: CG group
It involve core stability exercise and stretching exercise. All of above will be arranged 3 times a week for a total 6 weeks.
  1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times

    1. supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction.
    2. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees.
    3. All four position with leg raise
  2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times

    1. Hamstring
    2. Quadriceps
Other Names:
  • General core strengthening

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Leg Length Inequality
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
functional leg length inequality
change from baseline at 6 weeks later
Ilium Anterior Tilt Difference
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
bilateral ilium anterior tilt difference
change from baseline at 6 weeks later
Pelvic Inclination
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
bilateral pelvic inclination
change from baseline at 6 weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome
change from baseline at 6 weeks later
Functional Disability
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
Oswestry disability index (ODI) Maximum: 100 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome
change from baseline at 6 weeks later
Functional Ability
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
PSFS (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a better outcome
change from baseline at 6 weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yi-Fen Shih, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain, Recurrent

Clinical Trials on GC group

3
Subscribe