Energy Expenditure From ECAL Indirect Calorimeter in a Multicomponent Weight Management Service (ECAL)

July 26, 2023 updated by: Prof. John Wilding, University of Liverpool

Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate Impact of Energy Expenditure Information on the Outcome of Weight Loss During a Standardised Multicomponent Weight Management Intervention

Whether greater weight loss is as a result of a smaller reduction in energy expenditure with caloric restriction is not known. Resting energy expenditure and 24-hour energy expenditure vary substantially between individuals. In some cases, relatively reduced rates of 24h EE predict weight gain in some populations who have high prevalence of obesity. Obese individuals that lose weight experience a decrease in 24-h EE and resting energy expenditure that is lower than predicted based on changes in body composition. Most weight loss studies have found a large individual variation in the amount of weight change, and whether an individual's response to an intervention can be predicted is not clear. Measurements of 24-hour EE in response to fasting may help predict weight loss. The ECAL indirect calorimeter (ECAL) is a validated device purpose-built to provide the practitioner and patient with energy information that allows for more accurate, reliable method of establishing an obese individuals' metabolic profile. The aim of this study is to determine whether providing energy information from ECAL indirect calorimeter as an adjunct to the multicomponent weight management intervention in non-diabetic obese and severely obese individuals would help predict the response of weight loss.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Weight loss is important to improve overall health and reduce risk of obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes. Numerous studies performed on individuals with predisposed genetic propensity to obesity who are deemed to be metabolically 'thrifty', require further structured intensification of caloric restriction and change in physical activity in order to achieve weight loss. Whether greater weight loss is as a result of smaller reduction in energy expenditure with calorie restriction is not known. Resting energy expenditure and 24-hour energy expenditure vary substantially between individuals. Obese individuals that lose weight experience a decrease in 24-h EE and resting energy expenditure that is lower than predicted based on changes in body composition. Most weight loss studies have found a large individual variation in the amount of weight change, and whether an individual's response to an intervention can be predicted is not clear. Measurements of 24-hour EE in response to fasting may help predict weight loss. The ECAL indirect calorimeter (ECAL) is a validated device purpose-built to provide the practitioner and patient with energy information that allows for more accurate, reliable method of establishing an obese individuals' metabolic profile. The ECAL device also measures the respiratory quotient (RQ) which is the ratio of the volume of carbon dioxide expired to that of oxygen consumed by the individual for every breath. Previous studies demonstrated variability in role of RQ in predicting weight loss, but individuals who demonstrated an RQ in the lower range (<0.72) were more likely to maintain the weight-loss achieved on a caloric restriction and avoid a weight loss rebound as compared to those with RQ in the higher range (>0.75). This suggests that RQ could prove useful in clinical practice as a prognostic marker for long-term effectiveness of low- and very-low-calorie diets used to induce weight loss. Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging shared a similar finding that fasting RQ or respiratory exchange ratio adjusted for age, BMI, and fat free mass was positively related to weight change. The aim of this study is to determine whether providing energy information from ECAL indirect calorimeter as an adjunct to the multicomponent weight management intervention in non-diabetic obese and severely obese individuals would help predict the response of weight loss.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L9 7AL
        • University Hospital Aintree

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > or equivalent to 30 kg/m2 to - 60 kg/m2
  • Stable weight (change of <5% within 12 weeks before screening based on medical history)
  • Subjects are well-motivated, capable and willing to learn how to undergo indirect calorimetry testing
  • Willing and able to adhere to prohibitions and restrictions specified within this protocol

For Subjects participating in the glycaemic variability sub-study:

  • Subject understands instructions on the use of continuous glucose monitor sensor and is willing to undergo appropriate training and testing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking weight loss medication within 12 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Previous or planned bariatric surgery
  • History of Type 1, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, DKA or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis
  • Has HbA1c > or equal to 6.5% or Fasting Plasma Glucose > or equal to 7.0 mmol/L at screening.

NOTE: a one-time repeat measurement is allowed, if value of HbA1c and/or FPG is not consistent with prior values

  • History of obesity with a known secondary cause (Cushing's disease/syndrome)
  • Oral corticosteroid use (except in the short term use of a 7-10 day course)
  • Ongoing, inadequately controlled thyroid disorder defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone > 6 mIU/litre or < 0.4 mIU/litre
  • History of malignancy within 3 years before screening (or diagnosis of malignancy within this period)
  • estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 on serum testing
  • Alanine aminotransferase level is <2.0 times the upper limit of normal or total bilirubin is >1.5 times the upper limit of normal at screening
  • Other major illness likely to preclude participation in the trial
  • History of glucagonoma
  • A myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularisation procedure (stent or bypass graft surgery) or cerebrovascular accident within 12 weeks before screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ECAL group
Intervention group (ECAL) - practitioners and participants receive measured energy information from ECAL indirect calorimeter including resting energy expenditure and respiratory quotient to diagnose, manage and advise on modification of caloric restriction and physical activity level. Energy information also allows participant and practitioner to monitor and compare changes to their metabolic health throughout the duration of intervention.
The ECAL is an open-circuit portable indirect calorimeter that measures both volume of CO2 expired and O2 consumed using a small mixing chamber. Participants will breathe through a mouthpiece with a nose clip applied whilst lying in a restful and comfortable position for 15 minutes. ECAL device will provide breath-by-breath measurements of the resting energy expenditure and respiratory quotient which will allow both practitioners and participants to monitor their metabolic health and compare the effect of dietary and physical activity intervention over the course of the structured intensive lifestyle intervention (24-weeks).
Placebo Comparator: SC group
Standard care (SC) - participants receive standard care (diet, exercise & behaviour modification therapy) as part of the multicomponent weight management intervention within the tier 3 weight management service. Practitioners will rely on standard predictive equations to provide dietary advice and intervention.
Standard care (SC) - participants receive standard care (diet, exercise & behaviour modification therapy) as part of the multicomponent weight management intervention within the tier 3 weight management service. Practitioners will rely on standard predictive equations to provide dietary advice and intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Magnitude of weight loss (in kg)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting metabolic rate (RMR)
Time Frame: 6 months
The measurement of number of calories that the body burns at rest in 24 hours, expressed as kcal/day
6 months
Respiratory Quotient (RQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
The ratio of carbon dioxide production to oxygen consumption and reflects the relative contribution of fat, carbohydrate, and protein in the oxidation fuel mixture.
6 months
Secretion of gut hormones (GLP-1, GIP, PYY)
Time Frame: 6 months
Secretion of appetite regulating gut hormone (GLP-1, GIP, PYY) in fasting and post-prandial phase
6 months
Glycaemic variability
Time Frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in the swings in blood glucose levels, expressed as the mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion (MAGE)
6 months
Insulin sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in the measure of insulin rise in response to blood sugar levels, expressed as the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). HOMA estimates steady state beta cell function and insulin sensitivity as percentages of the normal reference population.
6 months
Sensory Neuropathy Testing in Prediabetic Obese Individuals
Time Frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in vibration perception threshold measurement using the neurothesiometer
6 months
Douleur Neuropathique en4 Questions (DN4)
Time Frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in Douleur Neuropathique en4 Questions (DN4) using seven interview questions and three physical tests.
6 months
Visual analogue score
Time Frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in visual analogue score of pain, expressed as Units on a scale of 0 to 100. where 0 is worst possible health and 100 is the best possible health.
6 months
modified Total Neuropathy Score
Time Frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in modified Total Neuropathy Score (mTNS) questionnaire expressed as the average of the five components
6 months
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
Time Frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in brief pain inventory short form (BPI-SF) scored as the mean of the seven interference items.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Wilding, DM FRCP, University of Liverpool

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on ECAL Indirect Calorimeter

3
Subscribe