FLO for Discogenic Pain

March 13, 2019 updated by: Tissue Tech Inc.

FLO Injection for Discogenic Pain

Discogenic pain is pain originating from a damaged vertebral disc and be caused by inflammation, dehydration of the nucleus pulposus, decreased disc height, annular tears and impaired mechanical function of the disc.Non-operative treatment may include traction, steroid therapy, methylene blue injection and ablative therapy. However, there are few high quality studies evaluating these treatments for reducing discogenic low back pain and most clinical trials failed to detect significant differences between treatments and placebo therapies. Hence, there remains an unmet clinical need.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33607
        • Laser Spine Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subject (male or female) is at least 18 to 70 years of age
  • diagnosed with single level discogenic back pain confirmed by MRI and positive discography per Spine Interventional Society Guidelines
  • Diagnosis of disc degeneration with Pfirrmann score of 1-3
  • Subject has failed at least six months of conservative care
  • Subject is symptomatic with axial lower back pain greater than lower limb pain at the intensity of >6/10 concordant or partially concordant
  • The subject is able to comply with all post-operative standard of care and follow instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects has significant disc protrusion, severe lumbar spinal stenosis, spine tumor, severe disc degeneration, or Sacroiliac (SI) joint syndrome
  • Subject had previous surgery at the disc level
  • Patient has previously received injection of FLO within 3 months of screening
  • The subject is unable to comply with follow-up or not appropriate for inclusion based on investigator decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: AMUC Dosage 1
25mg amniotic and umbilical cord matrix
Cryopreserved human amniotic and umbilical cord product derived from donated human placental tissue following healthy, live, caesarian section, full-term births after determination of donor eligibility and placenta suitability.
EXPERIMENTAL: AMUC Dosage 2
50mg amniotic and umbilical cord matrix
Cryopreserved human amniotic and umbilical cord product derived from donated human placental tissue following healthy, live, caesarian section, full-term births after determination of donor eligibility and placenta suitability.
EXPERIMENTAL: AMUC Dosage 3
100mg amniotic and umbilical cord matrix
Cryopreserved human amniotic and umbilical cord product derived from donated human placental tissue following healthy, live, caesarian section, full-term births after determination of donor eligibility and placenta suitability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient back pain determined by visual analog scale
Time Frame: 3 months
0 to 100mm, 100mm worst pain
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life determined by SF-36
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
Short FormHealth Survey to evaluate quality of life across eight scales
3 and 6 months
Change in patient back pain determined by visual analog scale
Time Frame: 6 months
0 to 100mm, 100mm worst pain
6 months
Change in Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
0 to 50, higher the percentile, the worse the perceived lower back pain
3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 13, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 4, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 4, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CLARIX-CS003

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Discogenic Back Pain

Clinical Trials on amniotic and umbilical cord matrix

Subscribe