Comparative Evaluation of CTG With and Without rhPDGF- BB Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Root Coverage

Comparative Evaluation of rhPDGF- BB With Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel and CTG Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With CTG Alone for Root Coverage in Multiple Mandibular Gingival Recession Defects- A RCT

The present study is a human, prospective, single centre, single blind, comparative controlled randomized clinical trial for the treatment of Miller's Class I, II or combination of class I and II mandibular recession and comparing the clinical outcomes prior to and 6 months after treatment. The trial is in accordance to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

24 recession defects were selected in patients who were systemically and periodontally healthy, satisfying the determined inclusion criteria. Patients with at least two or more teeth having Miller's class I , II or combination of class I and II mandibular recession defects were included in the study. A detailed, thorough medical and dental history was obtained and each patient was subjected to comprehensive clinical and radiological examination. All patients were informed about the nature of the study, surgical procedure involved, potential benefits and risks associated with the surgical procedure and a written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

The patients were assigned into two treatment groups (test and control). The test group was treated with recombinant human Platelet Derived Growth Factor-BB and Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel +Connective Tissue Graft whereas the control group was treated by Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel +Connective Tissue Graft alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 58 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients fulfilling the following criteria were included in the study:-

    • Two or more teeth with Miller's class I and II or combined class I and II recession defects in mandibular anteriors.
    • Age group 21-58 years.
    • Patients with healthy or treated periodontal conditions.
    • Patients willing to participate in the study.
    • Absence of uncontrolled medical conditions.
    • Patients with full mouth plaque score </= 10%(O'Leary 1972)
    • Patients with esthetic concerns.
    • Patients with thick gingival biotype >0.8mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Tobacco smoking.
  • Uncontrolled medical conditions.
  • Untreated periodontal conditions.
  • Use of systemic antibiotics in the past 3 months.
  • Patients treated with any medication known to cause gingival hyperplasia.
  • Drug and alcohol abuse
  • No occlusal interferences.
  • Patient with a known hypersensitivity to rhPDGF-BB.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Test group - rhPDGF-BB+MCAT+CTG
Root coverage surgical procedure.The patients were assigned into two treatment groups (test and control). Intervention - The test group recession coverage is treated with modified coronally advanced tunnel with connective tissue graft with recombinant human platelet derived growth factor- BB
recession coverage is treated with modified coronally advanced tunnel with connective tissue graft with recombinant human platelet derived growth factor- BB for Experimental: Test group and without recombinant human platelet derived growth factor- BB for Active Comparator: Control group
Other Names:
  • root coverage with/without growth factor
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control group - MCAT+CTG
Root coverage surgical procedure.The patients were assigned into two treatment groups (test and control). Intervention - The control group recession coverage is treated with modified coronally advanced tunnel with connective tissue graft alone
recession coverage is treated with modified coronally advanced tunnel with connective tissue graft with recombinant human platelet derived growth factor- BB for Experimental: Test group and without recombinant human platelet derived growth factor- BB for Active Comparator: Control group
Other Names:
  • root coverage with/without growth factor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival recession depth (GRD)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured as the distance from the Cemento Enamel Junction to the gingival margin
6 months
2. Gingival Recession Width (GRW)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured as the distance between the mesial gingival margin and distal gingival margin
6 months
Mean root coverage(MRC)
Time Frame: 6 months
(Baseline recession depth - 6 month recession depth/Baseline recession depth)*100
6 months
Complete root coverage(CRC)
Time Frame: 6 months
root coverage regarded as complete with gingival margin located at the level of Cemento Enamel Junction
6 months
coverage esthetic score(RCES)
Time Frame: 6 months

The Aesthetic evaluation was performed according to the root coverage aesthetic score system (RES)

Five Variables evaluated which are as follows:

  1. Level of Gingival margin (GM)
  2. Marginal Tissue Contour (MTC)
  3. Soft Tissue Texture (STT)
  4. Mucogingival Junction(MJ) alignment
  5. Gingival Colour (GC)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
probing pocket depth (PD)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured as the distance from the gingival margin to the base of gingival sulcus
6 months
clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured as Gingival Recession Depth + Probing Depth
6 months
width of keratinized tissue (KTW)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured as the distance from the mucogingival junction to the gingival margin , with the mucogingival junction location determined using a visual method (Schiller's Potassium Iodide Solution).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dr. Joann P George, MDS, Krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on root coverage

3
Subscribe