Comparison of Rotator Interval Injection Versus Intraarticular Hydrodilatation in Frozen Shoulder

April 27, 2021 updated by: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Comparing the Efficacy of Rotator Interval Steroid Injection Versus Steroid Intraarticular Hydrodilatation in the Treatment of Frozen Shoulder

This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of hydrodilatation with steroid via posterior approach versus rotator interval approach for treating patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adhesive capsulitis is a common cause of shoulder pain, and the efficacy of most interventions is limited. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of rotator interval injection with steroid with that of steroid hydrodilatatoin for treating adhesive capsulitis.

Design: a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, clinical trial

Patient and methods:

Patients with adhesive capsulitis were enrolled and randomly allocated into group 1 ( ultrasound guided rotator interval injection ) and group 2 (ultrasound guided steroid hydrodilatation). The patients were evaluated before treatment and were reevaluated 0, 6, and 12 weeks after the beginning of the treatment. Outcomes measures included a pain scale (visual analog scale), range of motion, Constant shoulder score, and Shoulder Pain And Disability Index.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 241
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of frozen shoulder by physical examination and ultrasonography

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. other conditions involving the shoulder ( rheumatoid arthritis, Hill-Sachs lesions,osteoporosis, or malignancies in the shoulder region)
  2. neurologic deficits affecting shoulder function in normal daily activities
  3. shoulder pain caused by cervical radiculopathy
  4. a history of drug allergy to xylocaine or corticosteroid
  5. pregnancy or lactation;
  6. received injection into the affected shoulder during the preceding 3 months
  7. history of surgeries on the affected shoulders
  8. Secondary frozen shoulder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: rotator interval injection
patient received ultrasound-guided steroid injection via rotator interval
via rotator interval.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: posterior recess injection
patient received ultrasound-guided steroid injection via posterior recess
via posterior glenuhumeral recess

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder Pain And disability index
Time Frame: Change of the score between 6 weeks and baseline, and change of the score between 12 weeks and baseline
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use. The SPADI takes 5 to 10 minutes for a patient to complete and is the only reliable and valid region-specific measure for the shoulder.function. The score is divided into four sections: pain, activity of daily living, ROM and strength
Change of the score between 6 weeks and baseline, and change of the score between 12 weeks and baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity
Time Frame: Change of the score between 6 weeks and baseline, and change of the score between 12 weeks and baseline
pain intensity was measured by visual analog scale. Each patient was asked to indicate his/her current level of pain by marking a point on a 100-mm VAS, for which 0 represented no pain and 100 represented unbearable pain.
Change of the score between 6 weeks and baseline, and change of the score between 12 weeks and baseline
glenohumeral joint range of motion
Time Frame: Change at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Shoulder flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation were measured with goniometer with patient in supine position
Change at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 28, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 15, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adhesive Capsulitis

Clinical Trials on Triamcinolone (Shincort) injection to rotator interval

3
Subscribe