EEG Controlled Triage in the Ambulance for Acute Ischemic Stroke (ELECTRA-STROKE)

June 7, 2022 updated by: Jonathan Coutinho, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard treatment for patients with a large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Direct presentation of patients with an LVO to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) reduces onset-to-treatment time by approximately an hour and thereby improves clinical outcome. However, a reliable tool for prehospital LVO-detection is currently not available. Previous electroencephalography (EEG) studies have shown that hemispheric hypoxia quickly results in slowing of the EEG-signal. Dry electrode EEG caps allow reliable EEG measurement in less than five minutes. We hypothesize that dry electrode EEG is an accurate and feasible diagnostic test for LVO in the prehospital setting.

ELECTRA-STROKE is a diagnostic pilot study that consists of four phases. In phases 1, 2 and 3, technical and logistical feasibility of performing dry electrode EEGs are tested in different in-hospital settings: the outpatient clinic (sample size: max. 20 patients), Neurology ward (sample size: max. 20 patients) and emergency room (sample size: max. 300 patients), respectively. In the final phase, ambulance paramedics will perform dry electrode EEGs in 386 patients with a suspected stroke. The aim of the ELECTRA-STROKE study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of dry-electrode EEG for diagnosis of LVO-a stroke when performed by ambulance personnel in patients with a suspected AIS. Sample size calculation is based on an expected specificity of 70% and an incidence of LVO stroke of 5%.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

RATIONALE

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) if there is a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation (LVO-a). Because of its complexity, EVT is performed in selected hospitals only. Currently, approximately half of EVT eligible patients are initially admitted to hospitals that do not provide this therapy. This delays initiation of treatment by approximately an hour, which decreases the chance of a good clinical outcome. Direct presentation of all patients with a suspected AIS in EVT capable hospitals is not feasible, since only approximately 7% of these patients are eligible for EVT. Therefore, an advanced triage method that reliably identifies patients with an LVO-a in the ambulance is necessary. Electroencephalography (EEG) may be suitable for this purpose, as preliminary studies suggest that slow EEG activity in the delta frequency range correlates with lesion location on cerebral imaging. Use of dry electrode EEG caps will enable relatively unexperienced paramedics to perform a reliable measurement without the EEG preparation time associated with 'wet' EEGs. Combined with algorithms for automated signal analysis, we expect the time of EEG recording and analysis to eventually be below five minutes, which would make stroke triage in the ambulance by EEG logistically feasible.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that EEG accurately identifies the presence of an LVO-a stroke in patients with a suspected AIS when applied in the ambulance.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of dry-electrode EEG for diagnosis of LVO-a stroke when performed by ambulance personnel in patients with a suspected AIS.

STUDY DESIGN

This diagnostic study consists of four phases:

Phase 1: Optimization of measurement time and software settings of the dry electrode cap EEG in a non-emergency setting in patients in whom a regular EEG is/will be performed for standard medical care. Sample size: maximum of 20 patients.

Phase 2: Optimization of measurement time and software settings of the dry electrode cap EEG in patients close to our target population in a non-emergency setting. Sample size: maximum of 20 patients.

Phase 3: Validation of several existing algorithms and development of one or more new algorithms for LVO-a detection, as well as optimization of logistics and software settings of the dry electrode EEG cap in patients close to our target population in an in-hospital emergency setting. Sample size: maximum of 300 patients.

Phase 4: Validation of several existing algorithms and algorithms developed in phase 3 for LVO-a detection in patients with a suspected AIS in the ambulance, as well as assessment of technical and logistical feasibility of performing EEG with dry electrode caps in patients with a suspected AIS in the ambulance. Sample size: maximum of 386 patients.

STUDY POPULATION

Phase 1: Patients in the outpatient clinic of the Clinical Neurophysiology department of the AMC, in whom a regular EEG has been/will be performed for standard medical care.

Phase 2: Patients with an AIS admitted to the Neurology ward of the coordinating hospital with an LVO-a (after reperfusion therapy).

Phase 3: Patients with a suspected AIS in the emergency room (ER) of the coordinating hospital (before endovascular treatment).

Phase 4: Patients with a suspected AIS in the ambulance.

INTERVENTION

Performing a dry electrode cap EEG (in phase 1 in the outpatient clinic, in phase 2 during hospital admission, in phase 3 in the ER and in phase 4 in the ambulance).

MAIN END POINTS

Primary end point: the diagnostic accuracy of dry electrode cap EEG to discriminate LVO-a stroke from all other strokes and stroke mimics in the prehospital setting (study phase 4) expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of the theta/alpha ratio.

Secondary end points:

  • Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the theta/alpha ratio, and test characteristics of other existing EEG data based algorithms for LVO-a detection (e.g. Weighted Phase Lag Index, delta/alpha ratio);
  • Logistical and technical feasibility of paramedics performing dry electrode cap EEG in the ambulance in suspected AIS patients;
  • Developing one or more novel EEG data based algorithms with an optimal diagnostic accuracy for LVO-a detection in suspected AIS patients with ambulant dry electrode cap EEG.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

386

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105AZ
        • Recruiting
        • Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

STUDY PHASE 1

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age of 18 years or older;
  • Patient is in the outpatient clinic of the Clinical Neurophysiology department of the AMC, because a regular EEG has been/will be performed on him/her for standard medical care;
  • Written informed consent by patient.

Exclusion criteria:

- Injury or active infection of electrode cap placement area.

STUDY PHASE 2

Inclusion criteria:

  • A diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation (intracranial carotid artery or proximal (M1/M2) middle cerebral artery confirmed by neuro-imaging (CTA or MRA);
  • Stroke onset <72 hours before expected time of performing EEG;
  • Age of 18 years or older;
  • Written informed consent by patient or legal representative.

Exclusion criteria:

- Injury or active infection of electrode cap placement area.

STUDY PHASE 3

Inclusion criteria:

  • Suspected acute ischemic stroke, as judged by the paramedic presenting the patient to the ER or known AIS with an LVO-a;
  • Onset of symptoms or, if onset was not witnessed, last seen well <24 hours ago;
  • Age of 18 years or older;
  • Written informed consent by patient or legal representative (deferred).

Exclusion criteria:

- Injury or active infection of electrode cap placement area.

STUDY PHASE 4

Inclusion criteria:

  • Suspected acute ischemic stroke as judged by the attending paramedic;
  • Onset of symptoms or, if onset not witnessed, last seen well <24 hours ago;
  • Age of 18 years or older;
  • Written informed consent by patient or legal representative (deferred).

Exclusion criteria:

- Injury or active infection of electrode cap placement area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Dry electrode cap EEG
In this diagnostic accuracy study, all patients that are included in the study will undergo a dry electrode electroencephalography (EEG).
A single dry electrode electroencephalography (EEG) will be performed in each patient that is included in this study. To do this, the investigators will use the WaveguardTM dry electrode EEG cap and compatible eegoTM amplifier, developed by ANT Neuro B.V. Netherlands and both CE marked as medical devices in the European Union (see appendices 1 and 2). Both products will be used within the intended use as described in the user manuals. The dry electrode cap is put on the patients head and records the EEG signal for several minutes; the amplifier is used to amplify the EEG signal and reduce artefacts.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The diagnostic accuracy of dry electrode cap EEG to discriminate LVO-a stroke in the prehospital setting expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of the theta/alpha ratio.
Time Frame: The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
The diagnostic accuracy of dry electrode cap EEG to discriminate LVO-a stroke from all other strokes and stroke mimics in the prehospital setting (study phase 4) expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of the theta/alpha ratio.
The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of dry electrode EEG for diagnosis of LVO-a
Time Frame: The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Sensitivity of the theta/alpha ratio, and test characteristics of other existing EEG data based algorithms for LVO-a detection (e.g. Weighted Phase Lag Index, delta/alpha ratio).
The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Specificity of dry electrode EEG for diagnosis of LVO-a
Time Frame: The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Specificity of the theta/alpha ratio, and test characteristics of other existing EEG data based algorithms for LVO-a detection (e.g. Weighted Phase Lag Index, delta/alpha ratio).
The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Positive predictive value of dry electrode EEG for diagnosis of LVO-a
Time Frame: The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Positive predictive value of the theta/alpha ratio, and test characteristics of other existing EEG data based algorithms for LVO-a detection (e.g. Weighted Phase Lag Index, delta/alpha ratio).
The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Negative predictive value of dry electrode EEG for diagnosis of LVO-a
Time Frame: The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Negative predictive value of the theta/alpha ratio, and test characteristics of other existing EEG data based algorithms for LVO-a detection (e.g. Weighted Phase Lag Index, delta/alpha ratio).
The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Technical feasibility of performing dry electrode EEGs in the ambulance
Time Frame: Feedback on technical issues by the paramedic that performs the EEG and by the EEG-expert, will be collected directly at arrival in the emergency department (within 24 hours after the patient is included in the study).
Technical feasibility of performing dry electrode cap EEGs on patients with a suspected acute ischemic stroke in the ambulance
Feedback on technical issues by the paramedic that performs the EEG and by the EEG-expert, will be collected directly at arrival in the emergency department (within 24 hours after the patient is included in the study).
Logistical feasibility of performing dry electrode EEGs in the ambulance
Time Frame: Feedback on logistical issues by the paramedic that performs the EEG, will be collected directly at arrival in the emergency department (within 24 hours after the patient is included in the study).
Logistical feasibility of performing dry electrode cap EEGs on patients with a suspected acute ischemic stroke in the ambulance
Feedback on logistical issues by the paramedic that performs the EEG, will be collected directly at arrival in the emergency department (within 24 hours after the patient is included in the study).
Algorithms with an optimal diagnostic accuracy for LVO-a detection in suspected AIS patients with ambulant dry electrode cap EEG.
Time Frame: The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.
Developing one or more novel EEG data based algorithms with an optimal diagnostic accuracy for LVO-a detection in suspected AIS patients with ambulant dry electrode cap EEG.
The presence or absence of an LVO-a will be assessed based on CT angiography data obtained at the emergency department (within 24 hours after inclusion in the study). EEG data will be collected at baseline.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan M Coutinho, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 4, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Ischemic

Clinical Trials on Dry electrode EEG

3
Subscribe