Effect of Robot Gait Training With Brain Stimulation on Gait Function in Stroke Patients

May 25, 2020 updated by: Samsung Medical Center
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of robot gait training with the noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gangnam-gu
      • Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Korea, Republic of, 06351
        • Samsung Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: more than 18 years
  • More than 6 months post stroke
  • Functional ambulation classification (FAC) (1~4)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious cardiac conditions (hospitalization for myocardial infarction or heart surgery within 3 months, history of congestive heart failure, documented serious and unstable cardiac arrhythmias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe aortic stenosis, angina or dyspnea at rest or during activities of daily living)
  • Difficult to understand experimental tasks because of extremely severe cognitive impairment
  • History of disorders involving central nervous system
  • History of psychiatric disease
  • implanted objects that would contraindicate tDCS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robot gait training with brain stimulation
Lokomat robot training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the leg motor areas
Lokomat robot training was applied to stroke patients.
tDCS brain stimulation on leg motor areas was applied to stroke patients.
Active Comparator: Robot gait training without brain stimulation
Lokomat robot training and sham tDCS on the leg motor areas
Lokomat robot training was applied to stroke patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 10 meter walk test from baseline in gait speed
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Measure of self selected speeds by measuring the time it takes an individual to walk 10 meters. To perform the test, patient walks 10 meters (33 ft) and the time is measured when the leading foot crosses the start line and the finish line. The instructions are: "Please walk this distance at your normal pace when I say go."
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Berg Balance Scale from baseline in balance
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Meserue of blance function
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Change in Functional ambulatory category from baseline in gait function
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Measure of functional ambulatory category
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Change in Timed Up and Go test from baseline in balance
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Measure of Timued Up and Go test in balance
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Change on gait function (kinematic)
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
All participants perform overground walking to assess the change of kinematic using a motion analysis.
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Change on gait function (kinetic)
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
All participants perform overground walking to assess the change of kinetic using a force plate
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Change on gait function (muslce activation)
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
All participants perform overground walking to assess the change of muscle activation using a surface EMG.
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Changes in motor evoked potentia
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
measure the motor threshold and amplitude of motor evoked potential in first dorsal interosseous muscle and TA muscle.
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Changes in Brain activation of resting-state functional MRI
Time Frame: session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)
Neuroplasticity measure
session 0 (initial visit); session 10 (at approximately 3 weeks); after 1 months from intervention termination (follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Robot gait training

3
Subscribe