Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Conventional and Digital Removable Partial Dentures (TRI-RBD)

January 16, 2026 updated by: Enas Mesallum, King Abdulaziz University

Patient-Related Outcomes of Digital and Conventional Removable Partial Dentures..A Crossover Randomised Clinical Trial

Study type: cross over within subject clinical trial Primary aim: To compare patient satisfaction among three different RPDs: conventional cast Co-Cr, 3D-printed Co-Cr, and PEEK RPDs.

Secondary aim: To evaluate the impact of these RPDs on oral health-related quality of life and patient preference among these RPDs

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A within-subject randomized crossover clinical was conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University after obtaining an ethical approvalfrom the Faculty Ethical Committee. All patients have signed a consent before being enrolled in the study.

Each participant received three RPDs using three manufacturing techniques (conventional cast Co-Cr, 3D-printed Co-Cr, and milled PEEK) fabricated to the same RPD design specifications. Each RPD worn for 30 days with a one-week washout period between the trial phases.

Participants were selected from partially edentulous patients fulfilling mandibular Kennedy Class I with the first or second premolars as the last abutment teeth bilaterally . Inclusion criteria include good oral hygiene, healthy mucosa, and absence of systemic diseases affecting oral tissues. Exclusion criteria include allergy to materials, poor compliance, or history of temporomandibular disorders.

Sample size estimation is based on detecting a moderate effect size (f = 0.25) with 80% power and α = 0.05, requiring at least 30 participants. To account for possible dropouts, a total of 36 patients was recruited.

Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Visual Analogue Grade (VAG) scale (0-100 mm). The VAG evaluates satisfaction domains such as comfort, esthetics, speech, and mastication, while OHIP-14 measures the impact of oral health on quality of life through 14 questions covering 7 domains. At the end of all the treatment phases participants determined the most preferred denture by answering single choice question of the best overall denture among the three types.

Results will be statistically analysed using one ANOVA test and Tukeys test if the difference between groups is significant

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Western
      • Jeddah, Western, Saudi Arabia, 23341
        • Faulty of dentistry King Adbulaziz University-KAU
    • Westren
      • Jeddah, Westren, Saudi Arabia
        • King Adbulaziz University-KAU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Partially edentulous patients with mandibular Kennedy class I, last abutment is the first or second premolars, maxillary arch is dentate or restored, good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any systemic diseases that affect oral health, periodontal disease, improper patient compliance, TMD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional cast Co-Cr removable partial denture
This type of RPD is constructed from Cobalt Chromium metal framework using the lost wax technique conventional casting of a wax pattern made on an investment cast.. Each participant used the conventional denture for 30 days then they received the VAS and OHIP-14 questionnaire about their denture experience..Then wait one week without any dentures until they received the second denture type
Conventional Cr-Co RPD is constructed by the standard lost wax technique to act as active comparator being the traditional way of RPD construction
Experimental: 3D Printed Cr-Co removable partial denture
This is a digital RPD made from Cobalt Chromium metal which is printed by a 3D printer using selective laser melting technique..Each participant used the 3D printed denture for 30 days then they received the VAS and OHIP-14 questionnaire about their denture experience..Then wait one week without any dentures until they received the next denture type
3D Printed Cr-Co was constructed digitally using Laser Melting technology to 3D print the Cr-Co RPD to the same design used with the conventional and the patient used every denture for 30 days with one week wash out
Experimental: Milled PEEK removable partial dentures
This is a digital type of RPD made by milling polyetheretherktone discs using a milling machine..Each participant used the PEEK denture for 30 days then they received the VAS and OHIP-14 questionnaire about their denture experience..Then wait one week without any dentures until they received the other denture type
PEEK disc was milled using milling machine to construct RPD framework to the same design as other 2 groups, each patient will use all the 3 dentures for one month but with different sequences, after each type one week washout separated between the groups

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction using VAG
Time Frame: Delivery of the first denture type 1st questionnaire 30 days after receiving the first denture 7 days wash out Delivery of the second denture type 2nd questionnaire 30 days after using the denture 7 days wash out Final questionnaire after 30 days
Visual Analogue Grade 100 mm scale is used to measure patient satisfaction and comfort as zero indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best response
Delivery of the first denture type 1st questionnaire 30 days after receiving the first denture 7 days wash out Delivery of the second denture type 2nd questionnaire 30 days after using the denture 7 days wash out Final questionnaire after 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral Health related Quality of Life OHRQoL
Time Frame: Delivery of the first denture type 1st questionnaire 30 days after receiving the first denture 7 days wash out Delivery of the second denture type 2nd questionnaire 30 days after using the denture 7 days wash out Final questionnaire after 30 days
OHIP-14 questionnaire is used to assess the OHRQol
Delivery of the first denture type 1st questionnaire 30 days after receiving the first denture 7 days wash out Delivery of the second denture type 2nd questionnaire 30 days after using the denture 7 days wash out Final questionnaire after 30 days
Patient preference
Time Frame: After all the three dentures treatment phase 30 days after the delivery of the last denture according to sequence randomisation Study time line was 6 months from recruitment to final questionnaire
Single short end question to select one type of denture that was preferred by the patient after using all the three types
After all the three dentures treatment phase 30 days after the delivery of the last denture according to sequence randomisation Study time line was 6 months from recruitment to final questionnaire

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Enas E. Mesallum, PhD, Assistant Professor of Prosthodontics, King Abdulaziz University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only summary statistics will be included in the published article later on

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Partially Edentulous Patients

Clinical Trials on Conventional cast Cr-Co RPDs

Subscribe