Accuracy of Arch Analysis in Mixed Dentition Using Digital Models Versus Plaster Ones.

September 2, 2020 updated by: Sara Mohamed Tag El Deen, Cairo University

Accuracy of Arch Analysis in Mixed Dentition Using Digital Study Models Versus the Plaster Models Using Tanaka and Johnston Prediction Equation:

Accuracy of arch analysis in mixed dentition using digital study models versus the plaster models using Tanaka and Johnston prediction equation:

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Space analysis is traditionally performed by diagnostic measurements that have been obtained from plaster dental casts through measurements which might be influenced by subjective interpretation and bias when constructed.

*So another method of diagnostically measuring study models was introduced (Digital software). This system creates digital images of dental casts with software. From the digitized models, various analyses and routine measurements could be done that might accelerate and solve many problems and difficulties associated with storage, retrieval, reproduction, communication, and breakage of conventional plaster casts.

  • Taking an impressions for a mixed dentition aged children.
  • Perform a measurements using Tanaka and Johnston equation for an arch analysis using a caliper and 3Shape ortho-analyzer software.
  • Casts will be scanned using the 3D scanner then by using the 3shape software measurements will be held according to Tanaka and Johnstopn prediction equation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 00202
        • Recruiting
        • sara Mohamed

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 10 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Children aged six to Ten years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged range from 6-10.
  • patients medically free from any syndromes that could affect the normal eruption.
  • Normal radiographical findings in teeth eruption.
  • Erupted lower incisors.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extracted lower 1st permanent molar.
  • congenital missing of incisors.
  • Badly decayed permanent incisors or 1st molar that could compromise the measurements.
  • Any sensitivity to any of the impression materials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
accuracy of digital models in arch analysis.
Time Frame: 6 months
using digital models through software(3shape ortho analyzer) to evaluate it's accuracy in arch analysis through prediction equation(Tanaka and Johnston equations)versus plaster models by using manual caliper.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: sara Mohamed Tag El Deen, Master, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEBD-CU-2018-09-36

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on 3shape ortho analyzer software

3
Subscribe