Intraoperative Direct vs Postoperative Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Nerve Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty

October 25, 2022 updated by: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Intraoperative Direct Adductor Canal Nerve Block Versus Post Operative Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Double-blind Randomized Trial

This study compares analgesic effect between two techniques of adductor canal nerve block after total knee arthroplasty. The first group of the patients will receive intraoperative adductor canal nerve block; and the other group post operative ultrasound guided adductor canal nerve block. Investigators will measure postoperative opioid consumption, pain management and rehabilitation goals.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful alternative to treat late stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). Pain management has been one of the main focuses of postoperative care. Most surgeons prefer a comprehensive multimodal approach including preoperative pharmacological treatment, intraoperative infiltration with complex drug mixes and postoperative peripheral nerve block.

The most common postoperative nerve block alternative is the proximal femoral nerve block (FNB) which has shown improvements on postoperative pain measured by reduced opioid consumption and decreased pain at rest. Its main detractors argue that the motor nerve block effect is deleterious to early ambulation and have promoted adductor canal nerve blocks (ACB). Described by Lund et al in 2011, ACB block main femoral pain sensory contributors to the knee (articular branches of obturator nerve, vastus medialis branch and saphenous nerve) but is more distal to most motor branches to the quadriceps allowing near to normal quadriceps strength.

Standard ACB block is performed under ultrasound guidance after surgery completion, still in the operating room (OR). Recent literature has shown the anatomic feasibility of intraoperative ACB via blunt suprapatellar dissection in standard medial parapatellar TKA approaches. The study seeks to determine the effectiveness of standard ultrasound guidance ACB compared with intraoperative ACB.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

121

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Región Metropolitana
      • Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile, 8330024
        • Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary total knee arthroplasty
  • Unilateral
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I, II or III
  • Accepts spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General anesthesia
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Chronic opioid use
  • Allergic to bupivacaine or similar

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intraoperative Block

Before skin closure, blunt suprapatellar dissection proximal to medial femoral condyle towards adductor canal. Nerve block at this level with 20ml of Bupivacaine 0.25%.

Postoperatively, mid-thigh ultrasound guided standard adductor canal nerve block with 20ml of saline solution (NaCl 0.9%).

One shot adductor canal nerve block with 20ml of bupivacaine 0.25% through surgical incision
One shot adductor canal nerve infusion with 20ml of saline solution mid-thigh
Active Comparator: Ultrasound Block

Before skin closure, blunt suprapatellar dissection proximal to medial femoral condyle towards adductor canal. Nerve block at this level with 20ml of of saline solution (NaCl 0.9%).

Postoperatively, mid-thigh ultrasound guided standard adductor canal nerve block with 20ml Bupivacaine 0.25%.

One shot adductor canal nerve block with 20ml of bupivacaine 0.25% mid-thigh
One shot adductor canal nerve infusion with 20ml of saline solution through surgical incision

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
24 hour opioid consumption
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery
Opioid consumption by patient controlled analgesia (PCA) and any other oral or IV analgesics
First 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
24 patient reported pain
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery
Patient reported pain scale using visual analog scale (VAS) every 6 hours after surgery (0 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours)
First 24 hours after surgery
Time up and go Test
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Standardised test to determine patients ability to walk 24 hours after surgery
24 hours after surgery
Time to Discharge
Time Frame: 7 days
Time between surgery and patient in conditions for discharge: no IV requirements, basic walking capability and VAS pain score equal or below 3
7 days
Range of motion
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Active and passive knee range of motion
24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pablo Besa, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 24, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 180620002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Intraoperative Block

3
Subscribe