Treatment of Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears (REGEN PUB 2018)

October 18, 2023 updated by: Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Prospective Multi-center Study Comparing REGENETEN in Lieu of Standard Arthroscopic Repair of High-grade (>50%) Partial-thickness Tears

Demonstrate that REGENETEN is superior to standard repair techniques when surgically treating high-grade (>50%) partial-thickness tears because REGENETEN preserves more of the native tendon footprint resulting in less postoperative pain and faster recovery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to demonstrate arthroscopic surgical treatment of high-grade (>50%) partial-thickness tears using REGENETEN yields statistically superior patient post-operative recovery outcomes, faster return to activities of daily living, and less health care utilization versus standard surgical repair techniques.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32607
        • University of Florida Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
      • Jacksonville Beach, Florida, United States, 32250
        • Baptist Health
    • Georgia
      • Rome, Georgia, United States, 30165
        • Harbin Clinic
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40506
        • University of Kentucky
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Ochsner Health Center
    • Maryland
      • Annapolis, Maryland, United States, 21401
        • Anne Arundel Medical Center/Luminis Health
    • New York
      • DeWitt, New York, United States, 13214
        • Syracuse Orthopedic Specialist
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University
    • Ohio
      • Centerville, Ohio, United States, 45459
        • Orthopedic Associates of SW Ohio
    • Texas
      • Bedford, Texas, United States, 76021
        • Texas Orthopedic Specialists

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be considered qualified for enrollment if they meet the following criteria:

  1. Male or female ≥18 years
  2. High-grade (>50% tendon thickness) partial-thickness tear
  3. Failed conservative medical management of the tendon tear defined as:

    1. Four (4) to six (6) weeks of formal physical therapy or guided home exercises
    2. Activity modification
    3. Shoulder injection at the discretion of the surgeon
  4. Able to comply with the post-operative physiotherapy and follow-up schedule
  5. Able to speak and read English Provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Any one (1) of the following criteria will disqualify a patient from participation in the study:

  1. Prior shoulder surgery on index shoulder within 12 months of enrollment
  2. Failed primary rotator cuff surgery of the index shoulder
  3. On steroids within 1 month of enrollment
  4. Metastatic disease
  5. Concomitant surgeries for bone defects requiring bone implantation (Latarjet procedures) or for superior labral tear from anterior to posterior (SLAP)
  6. Concomitant biceps tenodesis
  7. Rheumatoid arthritis
  8. Advanced osteoarthritis
  9. Fatty infiltration of the index shoulder rotator cuff muscle ≥ Grade 3
  10. Chronic pain disorders (i.e., fibromyalgia)
  11. History of insulin dependent diabetes
  12. History of heavy smoking (> 1 pack per day) within 6 months of enrollment
  13. Currently involved in any injury litigation or workers compensation claims
  14. Hypersensitivity to bovine-derived materials Medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude safe participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant
Surgical treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with the REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant system.
The REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant is a bioabsorbable device that provides a layer of collagen over injured tendons.
Other: Arthroscopic repair of the high-grade (>50%) partialthickness
Surgical treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears using standard techniques.
Surgical treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears using standard techniques.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) score tear using standard surgical techniques.
Time Frame: at 3 months following index surgery
at 3 months following index surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASES score
Time Frame: over initial 3 months following index surgery
over initial 3 months following index surgery
Single Assessment Numeric Value (SANE) score
Time Frame: over initial 3 months following index surgery
over initial 3 months following index surgery
ASES Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score
Time Frame: over initial 3 months following index surgery
over initial 3 months following index surgery
ASES score
Time Frame: at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following index surgery
at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following index surgery
SANE score
Time Frame: at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following index surgery
at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following index surgery
ASES VAS pain score
Time Frame: at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following index surgery
at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following index surgery
Shoulder Stiffness Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: over 12 months following index surgery
Stiffness in the participant's index shoulder will be assessed using the shoulder stiffness VAS. The VAS is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line 100 millimeters (mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme: No Stiffness (0 mm) and Extreme Stiffness (100 mm). The VAS stiffness rating will be recorded pre-operatively, weekly from 1 week to 3 months post-surgery, and at 6 and 12 months post-surgery.
over 12 months following index surgery
Cumulative opioid use to treat the index shoulder
Time Frame: over 12 months following index surgery
over 12 months following index surgery
Cumulative non-opioid prescription medication use to treat the index shoulder
Time Frame: over 12 months following index surgery
over 12 months following index surgery
Duration of shoulder immobilization
Time Frame: following index surgery
following index surgery
Time to return to activities of daily living (ADLs) o Return to work by work type (sedentary; laborer) o Return to driving o Return to sports
Time Frame: following index surgery
following index surgery
Incidence of progression to full-thickness tear
Time Frame: within 12 months following index surgery
within 12 months following index surgery
Incidence of progression to full-thickness tear
Time Frame: within 24 months following index surgery
within 24 months following index surgery
Incidence of revision surgery (index shoulder; all causes)
Time Frame: within 24 months following index surgery
within 24 months following index surgery
Aggregate health care utilization costs
Time Frame: over 12 months following index surgery
over 12 months following index surgery
Operating room time (index surgery)
Time Frame: Intra-operative
Intra-operative
Number of steroid injections
Time Frame: over 12 months following index surgery
over 12 months following index surgery
Number of unscheduled clinic visits
Time Frame: over 12 months following index surgery
over 12 months following index surgery
Number of for-cause imaging procedures
Time Frame: over 12 months following index surgery
over 12 months following index surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Howard Harris, Texas Orthopedic Specialists

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of High-grade (>50%) Partialthickness

Clinical Trials on REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant

3
Subscribe