Clinical Trial on the Effect of REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant in the Supraspinatus Tendon Repair. (MALLAMANGUITO)

This study aims a determine the effect that the addition of REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant has on Supraspinatus Tendon Repair. 120 patients will be included in this prospective, randomized, parallel group study.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The rotator cuff tear is one of the most frequent pathologies in the shoulder joint. When there are many symptoms these breaks are repaired surgically. The success rate of healing of these injuries is between 30% and 80%. In two recent studies conducted at two of the centers participating in this trial, the success rate of repair was 75% (unpublished data) and 70% respectively.

The use of high porosity resorbable bovine collagen meshes as bioinductive scaffolds for cuff repair seems to be a valid alternative when trying to improve the success rate in the healing of rotator cuff injuries.

REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant (a high porosity reconstituted type I collagen mesh of bovine origin) is applied to the repaired tendon. In a pilot study of 9 subjects with full thickness supraspinatus ruptures who underwent tendon repair and subsequently had the implant associated with the rupture, a significant clinical improvement was observed after one year and was observed on magnetic resonance imaging ( RM) 100% healing of breaks. In a study of 33 subjects with partial thickness tears treated with the implant alone, improvement in MRI characteristics of the tendon was observed in 31 cases. There is a study that performs a histological analysis of samples obtained in 7 subjects in whom the implant was used. No evidence of foreign body reaction or inflammatory reaction was observed. In none of the three studies where said implant was used in humans were any complications or adverse effects related to the use of said implant observed.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effect that the addition of REGENETEN bovine collagen mesh has on tendon repair on MRI performed one year after surgery.

The study does not in itself pose a greater risk than the usual practice for the patient, since in these subjects where the implant could be used as a supplement to the repair, having already obtained the CE marking.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Ramon y Cajal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who, after having received information about the design, the purposes of the study, the possible risks that may arise from it, and who may at any time deny their collaboration, give their written consent to participate in the study.
  • >18 years
  • Patients who present:

    • Symptomatic ruptures of the supraspinatus muscle (SE) with or without involvement of the infraspinatus (IE) with anteroposterior size of the rupture of 1 to 4 cm.
    • With less than 3cm of retraction,
    • With the absence of severe muscular atrophy confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or CT (Absence of Goutalier grade I or II atrophy in muscle mass). MRI or CT must have been performed at most 6 months before the intervention.
    • That it be confirmed during the exploratory arthroscopy at the beginning of the intervention.
    • That after repair a coverage of the native footprint of the tendon of at least 80% is obtained
  • No presence of rupture that requires repair in the tendons of the subscapularis muscles or minor round
  • Understand the purpose of the study and be available for regular hospital visits.
  • Negative urine pregnancy test performed in the 7 days prior to the start of study treatment in premenopausal women or <2 years after menopause

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.
  • SE tendon tears of more than 3cm retraction
  • Tendon ruptures of the SE and IE muscles with anteroposterior size of the rupture greater than 4 cm.
  • SE and / or IE tendon ruptures that are considered irreparable or only partially repairable at the time of the intervention
  • Presence of ruptures of the subscapularis and / or minor round tendons
  • Presence of grade III or IV Goutallier atrophy in the supraspinatus muscle mass
  • History of other orthopedic pathologies in the affected shoulder (previous shoulder surgeries, fractures, tendon re-ruptures of the supraspinatus or other tendons, rheumatic diseases, septic arthritis, ...)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant
REGENETEN bioinductive Implant,a bovine mesh that will be implanted following supraspinatus tendon repair.
REGENETEN bioinductive Implant,a reconstituted bovine origin type I collagen mesh with a proprietary high porosity system that is commercialized sterile, dehydrated and desiccated in two sizes (20x26mm and 25x31mm). It will be implanted following supraspinatus tendon repair.
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Supraspinatus tendon repair.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Integrity of the tendon repaired in an MRI study one year after the intervention using the Sugaya classification (Sugaya H (2005)).
Time Frame: 12 months
This is a classification system described by Sugaya et al. which uses magnetic resonance imaging in order to evaluate tendon integrity after rotator cuff repair. Postoperative cuff integrity is classified into 5 categories: type I, sufficient thickness with homogenously low intensity; type II, sufficient thickness with partial high intensity; type III, insufficient thickness without discontinuity; type IV, presence of minor discontinuity; type V, presence of major discontinuity
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain levels. Measured with questions 3 to 6 of the Brief Pain Inventory.
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery
This item has a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 indicating "No pain" and 10 indicating "Pain as bad as you can imagine"
3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery
Functional changes, measured with the Constant-Murley Scale.
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery.
The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score is a scoring method used by clinicians to assess function of the shoulder. The score is on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being no shoulder function and 100 being excellent function.
3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery.
Functional changes, measured with ASES questionnaire.
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery.
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire was developed to provide a standardized method for evaluating shoulder function and has been validated in patients with any array of shoulder pathologies. The range is from 0 to 100, with 0 being worst, and 100 being best.
3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery.
Changes in quality of life measured with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery.

The Euro Quality of Life Five Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a Visual Analogue Scale.

The descriptive system describes the health state and consists of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients who reported problems were then categorized into two categories, a "has no problem" category (health state code of 1) and "has problem" category (health state code of 2-5) for each level of each dimension.

The second part of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is the EQ-VAS, which is a thermometer-like scale (ranging from 0 to 100) that reflects the patient's health in general. EQ-VAS represents the patient perspective, where 0 indicates the worst imaginable health state and 100 reflects the best imaginable health state.

3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery.
Number of patients with complications in both arms
Time Frame: 12 months
Rate of complications, including: infection, implant intolerance, readmission, reoperation, or fracture.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Miguel Angel Ruiz Iban, MD, PhD, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Spain

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MALLAMANGUITO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Supraspinatus Tear

Clinical Trials on REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant

Subscribe