HEARt Sounds: Audio Recordings to Improve Discharge Communication for Cardiology Inpatients

June 28, 2021 updated by: Paul J. Barr, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

HEARt Sounds: A Pilot Randomized Trial to Determine the Feasibility and Acceptability of Audio Recordings to Improve Discharge Communication for Cardiology Inpatients

Ineffective hospital discharge communication can significantly impact patient understanding, safety, and treatment adherence. This is especially true for cardiology patients, who leave the hospital with complex discharge plans, a multitude of high-risk medications, post-procedural care instructions and recommendations for drastic lifestyle changes, all delivered in a time-pressured discharge discussion. The goal of this pilot trial is to determine if it is possible to use audio recordings to supplement usual discharge communication to improve cardiology patients' ability to understand and self-manage care after leaving the hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study objective is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of providing audio recorded discharge instructions to patients discharged from an inpatient cardiology service using a two-arm randomized controlled design. Specifically, this pilot study aims to: 1) Determine whether providing audio recorded discharge instructions as a supplemental discharge communication tool is feasible for cardiology providers and patients to use during the inpatient discharge discussion, 2) Determine whether it is acceptable for patients and families to use audio recorded discharge instructions after hospital discharge to self-manage care, and 3) Explore the impact of audio recording on patients' understanding of discharge instructions, ability to self-manage care and ability to adhere to prescribed medications.

On the day of discharge, enrolled patients will be randomized to a usual care arm, which includes bedside discussion and review of written discharge instructions with the discharging provider, or to an intervention arm, which includes bedside discussion and review of written discharge instructions with the discharging provider and an audio recording of that bedside discharge discussion using block randomization at the provider level. All participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive a portable, electronic recording device with audio playback that contains a recording of the bedside discharge discussion, and will also have the option to record the discharge discussion on a smartphone or receive access to the recording online, via the Open Recording Automated Logging System (ORALS). The hypothesis is providing audio recordings of discharge instructions will be feasible and acceptable to cardiology patients and providers.

One week after discharge, all enrolled patients (both arms) will be contacted via telephone to complete an interview about the use of written discharge instructions and a survey about understanding of discharge instructions, confidence and ability to self-manage care, and medication adherence. In addition, patients in the intervention arm will be interviewed about how the audio recording of the discharge discussion was used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Cardiology inpatients
  • Comfortable reading and writing in English
  • Willing to have discharge conversation recorded

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent
  • Diagnosis of dementia, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders
  • Have a substance-abuse disorder
  • Severe uncorrected vision or hearing problems
  • Currently living in skilled nursing facility or hospice
  • Planned discharge to a structured facility (e.g., skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, hospice)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Audio Recording
Participants receive a verbal discharge discussion with a provider, written discharge instructions and a re-playable audio recording of the discharge discussion with the discharging provider.
All participants will be provided with a re-playable audio recording of the discharge discussion on a portable electronic device. In addition, participants will have the option to record the discharge discussion on a personally-owned smartphone or receive access to the recording online, via the Open Recording Automated Logging System (ORALS).
No Intervention: Usual care
Participants receive a verbal discharge discussion with a provider and written discharge instructions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient enrollment (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization
The proportion of eligible cardiology inpatients who agreed to take part in the research.
Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization
Intervention fidelity (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization
The proportion of cardiology inpatients in the intervention arm that received the audio recording intervention with full adherence to a pre-defined protocol fidelity checklist. Any deviations will be documented.
Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization
Patient use of intervention (Acceptability)
Time Frame: Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
The proportion of discharged cardiology patients in the intervention arm who used the audio recording between the day of discharge and a one-week follow up telephone call initiated by the research team.
Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient activation
Time Frame: Time 0-Day of discharge, before randomization, Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization, Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
Measured using the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13). The PAM-13 is a 13-item survey that assesses a person's underlying knowledge, skills and confidence integral to managing his or her own health and healthcare. Each item is measured on a 4-point rating scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Scores for individual items are added to yield a sum score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater self-management ability.
Time 0-Day of discharge, before randomization, Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization, Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
Change in patient health confidence
Time Frame: Time 0-Day of discharge, before randomization, Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization, immediately post randomization, Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
The proportion of patients in the intervention arm, compared to patients in the usual care arm, who report high confidence measured using an adapted version of the Health Confidence Measure that includes three response options; "very confident", "somewhat confident" and "not confident". Response options are categorized, with "very confident" indicating high health confidence vs. "somewhat confident" and "not confident" indicating low health confidence.
Time 0-Day of discharge, before randomization, Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization, immediately post randomization, Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
Change in patient ability to understand health information
Time Frame: Time 0-Day of discharge, before randomization, Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization, immediately post randomization, Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
The proportion of patients in the intervention arm, compared to patients in the usual care arm, who report a high ability to understand health information measured using an adapted version of the Health Confidence Measure that includes three response options; "very understandable", "somewhat understandable" and "not understandable". Response options are categorized, with "very understandable" indicating a high ability to understand health information vs. "somewhat understandable" and "not understandable" indicating a low ability to understand health information.
Time 0-Day of discharge, before randomization, Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization, immediately post randomization, Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
Change in patient general medical adherence
Time Frame: Time 0-Day of discharge, before randomization, Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
Measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Measure of Adherence (MOS). The 5-item MOS measures general adherence to medical advice on a 6-point rating scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). Scores for individual items are averaged to yield a summary score ranging from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating better adherence.
Time 0-Day of discharge, before randomization, Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
Patient assessment of discharging provider communication ability
Time Frame: Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization
Measured using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). The 15-item CAT measures patient perceptions of physician performance in the area of interpersonal and communication skills using a 5-point rating scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The percentage of items scored as excellent is calculated as the percentage of items with a score of 5 (excellent) out of the number of items answered.
Time 1-Day of discharge, immediately post randomization
Patient adherence to medications
Time Frame: Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
Measured using the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS-7). The 7-item ARMS-7 measures medication adherence and refill behaviors on a 4-point rating scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). Individual items are added and can be treated as a continuous measure or dichotomized as 7 or >7, with lower scores indicating better adherence.
Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
Rate of patient-generated post-discharge phone calls
Time Frame: Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization
The number of patient-generated post-discharge phone calls to the outpatient cardiology clinic or hospital emergency telephone line between the time of discharge and the research team's post-discharge follow-up telephone interview (both arms), according to data provided by the hospital's informatics team and the electronic medical record.
Time 2-One week after discharge, post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul J Barr, PhD, MSc, Dartmouth College
  • Principal Investigator: Stacey L Schott, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • D18184

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease

Clinical Trials on Audio Recording

Subscribe