Sun Safety Skills for Elementary School Students

August 10, 2019 updated by: Kristin M. Nord, Stanford University
The overarching goal of this work is to pilot-test a song-based instructional video designed to help elementary school (kindergarten) age children independently apply sunscreen effectively (i.e., covers all needed areas), efficiently (i.e., can be accomplished in 2-3 minutes), consistently (i.e., continues to apply sunscreen routinely before recess both during and after the intervention), without impacting classroom function (i.e., no mess). The video is also designed to encourage use of hats and sunglasses. The outcomes of interest include identification of "gaps" in skills that are consistent for this age group (i.e., commonly miss application to the back of neck), areas of learning refinement (i.e., generalization of skills with different outfits on), and flexibility in terms of adapting practice (i.e., can they do it without the video). The investigators hope that this pilot project will pave the way for broader clinical / educational implementation of this intervention within schools.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will use an unblinded, open label, A-B design with a randomized follow-up period to evaluate the study objectives. The primary aim is to characterize the proportion of students (per class and total, or across classes) who productively engage in the in-classroom sunscreen application tasks when using the video guided sunscreen intervention (i.e., success is defined as any appropriate participation with video guided tasks, completing tasks and putting sunscreen away, sitting down by end of 2 minute, 42 second video intervention) relative to the proportion who achieve success (i.e., any appropriate effort to apply sunscreen, put away sunscreen and sit down within a two minute window) WITHOUT use of the video.

One hundred eight kindergarten students across four kindergarten classrooms (N = 27 per class) will complete a two-week baseline period in which the participants are provide a 2-minute window and allowed access to their sunscreen without instruction. Classroom teachers, trained to score our primary outcome (child does/does not complete this task within two-minute window), will evaluate outcomes for each child daily for two weeks (baseline period). Percentage of students who are able to complete this task is our primary endpoint. Change trajectories from beginning to end of the baseline period (Time 1/Day 1 - Time 2/Day 10) and from the beginning to end of treatment (Time 2 - Time 3) will be calculated for each class. The average percentage of the second week in the baseline period and the second week in the intervention period will be used to calculate the successful rate for each period with 95% confidence intervals.

To address a subsidiary aim, related to whether or not student competence with sunscreen application (systematic, % of body covered / body parts neglected, and completeness of coverage of face) is impacted by the video intervention, a randomly selected subset of students will be evaluated by a trained member of the study team for competence of application at Time 1,2, 3 and 4. Changes trajectories will be calculated by class for this subset of students.

At the study outset, all four classrooms will be randomized to either an "extended intervention" (EI) or "maintenance" (M) condition using a 1:1 randomization scheme. This will offer some descriptive, feasibility data regarding the tolerability of randomization by classroom, and a preliminary look at dose-response trends and short-term maintenance effects. Upon completion of the two-week baseline period and two-week standard intervention period, the two classrooms assigned to the EI condition will receive the video-based intervention for two additional weeks and the two classrooms assigned to the M condition will continue to receive a two- minute window for sunscreen application, but no video-based instruction. Change trajectories from Time 3-Time 4 (two-week follow up) will be compared by follow-up assignment condition and will provide preliminary information about dosing and maintenance effects.

Student, teacher, parent and administrator perceptions of the acceptability, value and utility of the intervention will be assessed at a single time point at the conclusion of the study.

Study Setting and Participants:

General Education Kindergarten students who meet all study eligibility requirements (i.e., including health requirements appropriate to the use of sunscreen) and who assent to participate and who receive parental consent to participate at Sedgwick Elementary School will be included in the present study. Special education students who are mainstreamed may also be considered eligible to participate via consensus from both parent and teacher.

Recruitment and screening: Recruitment efforts will include collaborative (research team + kinder teachers) efforts to provide parents an overview of the study goals and objectives, and to obtain consent/assent. The investigators will plan to have a parent-focused meeting in the weeks prior to the commencement of the study.

Intervention: The song-based video guided sun screen intervention is 2-3 minutes long, with 30 seconds allotted at the beginning for students to prepare their sunscreen materials and get ready, two minutes of instruction that guides their application of sunscreen to all exposed areas of skin starting with their head and working systematically down to their feet, and then 30 seconds of guided instruction for putting the sunscreen materials away and sitting back down at their desks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Cupertino, California, United States, 95014
        • Sedgwick Elementary School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • General education Kinder students (Sedgwick Elementary School in 2018-2019).
  • Child assent and parental consent are required to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-general education status;
  • significant medical, mental health and/or behavioral problem
  • child refusal of assent or parental refusal of consent;
  • known or identified allergy to ingredients in sunscreen;
  • moving out of the grade or school during the intervention or follow-up period;
  • participation in a concurrent sunscreen intervention protocol are exclusionary criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Extended intervention
Upon completion of the two-week baseline period and two-week standard intervention period, the two classrooms assigned to the Extended intervention condition will receive the "I wear sunscreen everyday" song-based video intervention daily for two additional weeks.
All four classes (arms) will be shown (sitting on carpet, not participating) a 2-3 minute song-based video titled "I wear sunscreen everyday" in which they observe elementary age children applying sunscreen in a systematic fashion. Following the viewing, classes will be administered this video guided, song- based intervention while their teacher documents their independent participation using our classroom map data collection sheet.
No Intervention: Maintenance

The two classrooms assigned to the Maintenance condition will continue to receive a two- minute window for sunscreen application, but no "I wear sunscreen everyday" song-based video instruction.

Change trajectories from Time 3-Time 4 (two-week follow up) will be compared by follow-up assignment condition and will provide preliminary information about dosing and maintenance effects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Teacher Ratings of Kinder Students' Successful/Not Successful Self-Application of Sunscreen.
Time Frame: Baseline to Posttreatment (Time 1 - Time 2; each Time is up to 15 minutes and separated by 2 weeks)
Change in the proportion of kindergarten students who successfully complete independent self-application of sunscreen within the allotted 2.5 minute time window from baseline (Time 1) to posttreatment (Time 2). Successful completion of the sun screen task (i.e., Kinder Students' self-application of sunscreen within the 2.5 minute window allotted by the intervention) will be determined via direct observation by the classroom teacher. Teachers will be formally trained by the study staff to rate student performance (i.e., successful/not successful) with self-application of sunscreen per a manualized study protocol.
Baseline to Posttreatment (Time 1 - Time 2; each Time is up to 15 minutes and separated by 2 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Teacher Identified Barriers to Kinder Student Self-Application of Sunscreen
Time Frame: Baseline to Posttreatment (Time 1 - Time 2; each Time is up to 15 minutes and separated by 2 weeks)
Teacher identified barriers, or the cognitive, emotional, behavioral, environmental, factors that interfered with a student's successful completion of the self-application of sunscreen task will be recorded by the classroom teacher daily during the sunscreen intervention. This descriptive outcome will be qualitative (i.e., teacher generated list).
Baseline to Posttreatment (Time 1 - Time 2; each Time is up to 15 minutes and separated by 2 weeks)
Teacher, parent and administrator perceptions of intervention utility.
Time Frame: Posttreatment (Time 2; up to 15 minutes)
Teacher, parents and administrators respond to a single item question, "In your opinion, how useful was this intervention in terms of getting students engaged in sun protective behavior?" This single item is modeled after utility questions used in health services research and educational research, and will be scored on an 11-point likert type scale, where "0" indicates not at all useful; and "10" indicates very useful.
Posttreatment (Time 2; up to 15 minutes)
Teacher, parent and administrator perceptions of intervention value.
Time Frame: Posttreatment (Time 2; up to 15 minutes)
Teacher, parents and administrators respond to a single item question "In your opinion, how valuable was this intervention to your overall curriculum? This single item is modeled after value questions used in health services and educational research and will be Responses will be scored on an 11-point likert type scale, where a score of "0" indicates not at all valuable and a score of "10" indicates very valuable.
Posttreatment (Time 2; up to 15 minutes)
Student perceptions of intervention likability
Time Frame: Posttreatment (Time 2; up to 15 minutes)
Kinder students respond to a single item question "Did you like the sunscreen video? " As Kinder students are not proficient readers, this question will be read aloud to the class, and students will respond individually by casting a "secret ballot" in a voting booth set up in the classroom- -under the direct supervision of the study staff. "Yes" votes will be cast using a piece of paper with a happy face on it; "no" votes will be cast using a piece of paper with a sad face on it. In this way, students can respond individually to this question without having to read, tell their answer to the teacher, and without undue influence of their peers. Results will be tallied by class.
Posttreatment (Time 2; up to 15 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristin Nord, MD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skin Cancer Prevention

Clinical Trials on "I wear sunscreen everyday" song-based video

3
Subscribe