Intralesional Sclerosant for in Transit and Cutaneous Melanoma Metastases (INTRANS)

There is currently an urgent need for low cost and well tolerated intralesional agents for the management of in transit and cutaneous melanoma metastases that are unsuitable for, or resistant to, other therapies. This pilot study will determine whether intralesional injections of the sclerosant polidocanol into intransit and cutaneous melanoma lesions shows promise for efficacy, safety and ease of use that will enable this inexpensive and widely available agent to undergo further evaluation.

Study Overview

• Status: Withdrawn
• Conditions: Melanoma; In-Transit Metastasis of Cutaneous Melanoma
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Polidocanol Injection

Detailed Description

Many patients with metastatic melanoma have in transit and other cutaneous metastases. Untreated, these lesions become eroded, haemorrhagic and symptomatic. When systemic therapy is not warranted, has failed or is not tolerated for in transit disease, and when surgery is not feasible or appropriate, other local treatments are needed. Current options include isolated limb infusion for bulky limb disease, topical immunotherapy with contact sensitisers and imiqiuimod for superficial, nonbulky disease or radiation therapy. Intralesional (IL) agents such as Rose Bengal (PV-10, Provectus) and Talimogene laherparepvec (T-Vec, Amgen) have been used for patients with limited numbers of cutaneous metastases with reported overall response rates of 51% and 26% respectively. It is thought that these IL agents can incite regional or even systemic anti-tumour immune responses, thus providing benefit beyond the individual injected lesions. Use of PV-10, which is not an intrinsic immune modulator, was associated with regression of untreated bystander lesions in 27% of patients.

T-Vec is not currently available as a subsidised product in Australia and PV-10 is not currently accessible outside of dual-agent systemic/IL clinical trials. Intralesional injection of the antimetabolites 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate has been used successfully for the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, but the efficacy of these agents in melanoma is unknown. Importantly, the investigator's in transit melanoma patients usually have multiple, often very numerous lesions, making IL injection with adequate volumes of antimetabolites difficult without significant risk of systemic haematologic, hepatic and renal side effects.

Hence there is currently an urgent need for tolerable, low cost and accessible intralesional therapies for in transit and cutaneous melanoma metastases.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intralesional therapy with the sclerosant polidocanol for treatment of in transit and cutaneously metastatic melanoma unsuitable for other therapies.

Intravascularly injected sclerosants have a long history of safe and effective use in the treatment of varicose veins. Sclerosants have also been used intralesionally for the treatment of cutaneous lesions such as squamous cell carcinoma, pyogenic granulomas, Kaposi sarcoma and angiomas. They are inexpensive, readily accessible and can be easily administered in the clinic to multiple metastases. By inciting cell death within melanoma metastases in the skin, they may also incite anti-tumour immune responses in untreated bystander lesions, as is observed with IL PV-10 therapy.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Phase: Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Australia
  • New South Wales
    • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
      • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Histologically confirmed in transit and/or cutaneous melanoma metastases unsuitable for, or with progressive disease despite systemic, surgical, intra-arterial, topical or radiation therapies
• A minimum of 2 accessible lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

• Periocular lesions
• Severe renal impairment defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <20ml/min/1.73sqm
• Sever liver function abnormality defined as aspartate aminotransferase and / or alanine aminotransferase > 3 x upper limit of normal and / or bilirubin > 1.5 x upper limit of normal
• known hypersensitivity to polidocanol or its exipients
• Patients unavailble for the full study duration (of a 4 week screening period and 8 week treatment period) because of general frailty, geographical or social reasons
• Pregnant or breast feeding female patients
• Patients receiving topical or radiation therapy to the in transit and / or cutaneous lesions within 4 weeks of planned start of study treatment (patients receiving current systemic immunotherapy which is deemed appropriate to continue, despite progression of disease in the skin, in order to reduce the likelihood of visceral metastases are eligible)
• Patients receiving sclerosants for other indications within 4 weeks of planned start of study treatment or during study treatment.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Polidocanol Injection; Polidocanol (3%) 0.1ml intralesional injection per 10mm diameter lesion	Drug: Polidocanol Injection; Sclerotic agent; Other Names: Aethoxysklerol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Clinical efficacy of interlesional polidocanol injection assessed by the size of in transit melanoma metastases after treatment	Proportion of patients with a complete response (complete disappearance of treated lesions), partial response (a 25% or more reduction in size of treated lesions), stable disease (a 0 to 24% reduction in size of treated lesions) or disease progression (any increase in size of treated lesions)	8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Incidence of treatment related adverse events	Treatment related adverse events using the CTCAE version 4 terms and grading.	8 weeks
Bystander treatment effect on untreated intransit melanoma metastases	Proportion of patients with a complete response (complete disappearance of untreated lesions), partial response (a 25% or more reduction in size of untreated lesions), stable disease (a 0 to 24% reduction in size of untreated lesions) or disease progression (any increase in size of untreated lesions)	8 weeks
Bystander treatment effect on the proportion of tumour infiltrating immune markers in treated and untreated melanoma lesions	The proportion (%) of tumour-infiltrating immune markers: CD4, CD8 and FoxP3 T cell markers, CD20 (B cell), CD16 and CD56 Natural Killer (NK) cell markers, Ki67 marker of proliferation, CD31 (endothelial cells) and CD68 and CD163 (macrophages) detected at baseline and 1 week after intralesional injection by immunohistochemistry. The same analysis will be undertaken in a minimuim of one untreated lesion detected at baseline and at anytime between 1 and 8 weeks. Change in the proportion (%) of immune markers will be ,made within each lesion and between each lesion.	8 weeks
Bystander treatment effect on tumour viabilty in treated and untreated melanoma lesions	The proportion of residual non-necrotic melanoma cells detected histolologcally in treated and untreated lesions one week after intralesional injection.	8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Melanoma Institute Australia
• Investigators: Study Director: Diona Damian, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): May 20, 2020
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): December 1, 2022
• Study Completion (Anticipated): December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 31, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 22, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): November 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 14, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 12, 2022
• Last Verified: July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Polidocanol; Sclerosant
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Skin Diseases; Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Neuroectodermal Tumors; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue; Neoplastic Processes; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Nevi and Melanomas; Neoplasm Metastasis; Melanoma; Skin Neoplasms; Pharmaceutical Solutions; Sclerosing Solutions; Polidocanol
• Other Study ID Numbers: HREC/18/RPAH 621

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No