- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03764033
A Novel Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment for Veterans With Moral Injury (IOK)
November 6, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
The objective of this project is to test the efficacy of an individual treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) stemming from moral injury called Impact of Killing (IOK), compared to a present-centered therapy (PCT) control condition, and to determine the rehabilitative utility of IOK for Veterans with PTSD.
The first aim is to test whether IOK can help improve psychosocial functioning for Veterans, as well as PTSD symptoms.
The second aim is to determine whether IOK gains made by Veterans in treatment are durable, as measured by a six-month follow-up assessment.
Veterans who kill in war are at increased risk for functional difficulties, PTSD, alcohol abuse, and suicide.
Even after current PTSD psychotherapies, most Veterans continue to meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD, highlighting the need for expanding treatments for PTSD and functioning.
IOK is a treatment that can be provided following existing PTSD treatments, filling a critical gap for Veterans with moral injury who continue to suffer from mental health symptoms and functional difficulties.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is now the most common mental health diagnosis among the youngest generation of Veterans receiving treatment from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), necessitating the need for diverse types of targeted care.
Although there are two evidence-based psychotherapies (EBP) for PTSD, the vast majority of combat Veterans who receive these treatments still meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD and their functioning continues to be impacted.
Furthermore, Veterans that have experienced trauma related to killing have high rates of suicide and more severe PTSD symptoms.
Although there have been few studies examining predictors of poor outcomes in EBPs, one area that has recently begun to receive growing attention is moral injury.
A recent study found that PTSD and moral injury were distinct constructs with unique signs and symptoms, and preliminary evidence indicates that the feelings of guilt and anger that characterize moral injury associated with trauma such as killing in war may contribute to worsening symptoms over the course of existing treatments.
Although PTSD may be one manifestation of psychological trauma related to killing, conceptualization of the impact of killing requires a broader framework.
The emerging concept of moral injury offers an alternative context to better understand the many possible outcomes of exposure to killing.
For these reasons, the development of targeted moral injury interventions is critical.
The investigators designed and received VA funding to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Impact of Killing (IOK) treatment, which can be seamlessly added as a standalone treatment following existing EBPs for PTSD.
IOK focuses on key themes including physiology of killing responses, moral injury, self-forgiveness, and improved post-deployment reintegration.
The treatment was designed to fit well into already existing systems of care and has been shown to improve functioning, PTSD symptoms, and general psychiatric symptoms following EBP.
Whereas the IOK RCT pilot was initially conducted at the San Francisco VA Healthcare System, the investigators' goal is to conduct a fully-powered, multi-site efficacy trial at two regionally-diverse sites with a larger sample size and active control condition.
Consequently, the objective of this project is to test the efficacy of an individual treatment for PTSD stemming from moral injury called IOK, compared to a present-centered therapy (PCT) control condition, and to determine the rehabilitative utility of IOK for Veterans seeking treatment for PTSD.
The primary outcome is psychosocial functioning.
The target population is Veterans who have initiated or completed Cognitive Processing Therapy or Prolonged Exposure Therapy, two EBPs for PTSD, and continue to have PTSD symptoms and moral injury related to killing.
Veterans will be randomly assigned to receive either: 1) IOK (10 individual therapy sessions lasting 60-90 minutes) or 2) PCT (sessions of equal duration to IOK).
The first aim is to test the efficacy of IOK through measures of psychosocial functioning (primary outcome) and PTSD severity (secondary outcome).
The second aim is to determine whether IOK gains made by Veterans are durable.
If the aims of this grant are achieved, the investigators will be able to have a moral injury intervention following EBP that can be seamlessly integrated into existing care for one of the most commonly occurring mental health problems in Veterans.
Furthermore, suicide is a national priority for VHA, and expanding treatment for PTSD and moral injury has the potential to decrease suicide and improve functioning in Veterans.
Finally, IOK offers skills and ways of understanding warzone experiences that can be mastered and can continue to be implemented by Veterans over time.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94121-1563
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
-
-
New York
-
The Bronx, New York, United States, 10468
- James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
- Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 82 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Veterans 18-82 years of age
- Veterans who meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or score 23 or higher on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS) screening interview.
Veterans who endorsed killing or being responsible for the death of another in a war zone and report continued distress regarding these events
- Distress will be operationalized by a positive response to one or more of the nine self-directed moral injury items on the Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version (EMIS-M) or item #4 on the Moral Injury Events Scale (MIES)
- Veterans who have initiated or completed an evidence-based treatment for PTSD, such as Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) or Prolonged Exposure (PE)
- If receiving CPT or PE, Veterans must complete treatment and wait two weeks prior to screening
- If receiving prescription medication for PTSD, Veterans must be one month stable on medication and not make any changes to medication during the course of the active treatment phase of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Veterans with current or lifetime diagnosis of a psychotic disorder or current untreated/unmanaged mania.
- Veterans with recent suicidal or homicidal behaviors (chronic suicidal ideation is not exclusionary)
- Veterans with recent psychiatric hospitalizations
- Veterans with moderate or severe alcohol or drug dependence within the past three months
Veterans receiving individual therapy for PTSD or those planning to start skills-based or trauma-focused group psychotherapy will be excluded
- However, these Veterans will be offered the opportunity to be screened again after completion of individual PTSD therapy or once they are three months stable in group treatment, with no plans to discontinue this treatment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Impact of Killing (IOK)
Participants in this arm will receive 10 sessions (60-90 minutes) of a cognitive-behavioral moral injury treatment called IOK .
|
Participants in this arm will receive 10 sessions (60-90 minutes) of a cognitive-behavioral moral injury treatment called IOK .
|
|
Active Comparator: Present Centered Therapy
Participants in this arm will receive 10 sessions (60-90 minutes) of a PTSD treatment that does not focus on trauma or cognitive restructuring, but rather the functional impact of trauma called Present Center Therapy (PCT)
|
Participants in this arm will receive 10 sessions (60-90 minutes) of a PTSD treatment that does not focus on trauma or cognitive restructuring, but rather the functional impact of trauma called Present Center Therapy (PCT)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
A widely-validated, 26-item measure on a 5 point scale that assesses functioning in physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment, with higher scores indicating greater health in each domain.
Each item is scored from 1-5, and a total raw score is calculated by summing all items (26-130).
The total score is calculated by transforming the raw score to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
|
Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
|
World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF
Time Frame: Change from post-treatment (Week 11) to 6 month follow-up (6 months after post-treatment)
|
A widely-validated, 26-item measure on a 5 point scale that assesses functioning in physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment, with higher scores indicating greater health in each domain.
Each item is scored from 1-5, and a total raw score is calculated by summing all items (26-130).
The total score is calculated by transforming the raw score to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
|
Change from post-treatment (Week 11) to 6 month follow-up (6 months after post-treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5)
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
This measure is used to identify DSM-5 criteria for PTSD.
CAPS-5 provides both a dimensional and categorical measure of current PTSD and the frequency and intensity of PTSD-related symptoms.
Score range from 0-80 with lower score representing fewer PTSD symptoms.
|
Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
A 20-item measure that assesses PTSD symptom severity using a 5-point rating scale.
The PCL-5 items correspond to the DSM-5 symptoms for PTSD.
Total severity can range from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater severity of PTSD symptoms.
|
Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
|
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: Change from post-treatment (Week 11) to 6 month follow-up (6 months after post-treatment)
|
A 20-item measure that assesses PTSD symptom severity using a 5-point rating scale.
The PCL-5 items correspond to the DSM-5 symptoms for PTSD.
Total severity can range from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater severity of PTSD symptoms.
|
Change from post-treatment (Week 11) to 6 month follow-up (6 months after post-treatment)
|
|
Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
A 53-item measure, using a 5-point Likert scale, in which participants rate the extent to which they have been bothered in the past week by various mental health symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, hostility, psychoticism, paranoid ideation, etc.).
The BSI measures global psychological distress, with scores ranging from 0-53.
Higher scores represent more severe psychiatric symptoms.
|
Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
|
Trauma-related Guilt Inventory (TRGI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
A 32-item measure, using a 5-point Likert scale, assessing the emotional and cognitive aspects of guilt associated with a specified traumatic event (e.g., combat experience, car accident, physical or sexual abuse, or sudden death of a loved one).
The TRGI has main scales representing guilt, distress and guilt cognitions.
Scores represent the average for items in the scale and range from 0-4, with higher scores representing greater guilt/distress.
|
Change from baseline (Week 0) and post-treatment (Week 11)
|
|
Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)
Time Frame: Change from post-treatment (Week 11) to 6 month follow-up (6 months after post-treatment)
|
A 53-item measure, using a 5-point Likert scale, in which participants rate the extent to which they have been bothered in the past week by various mental health symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, hostility, psychoticism, paranoid ideation, etc.).
The BSI measures global psychological distress, with scores ranging from 0-53.
Higher scores represent more severe psychiatric symptoms.
|
Change from post-treatment (Week 11) to 6 month follow-up (6 months after post-treatment)
|
|
Trauma-related Guilt Inventory (TRGI)
Time Frame: Change from post-treatment (Week 11) to 6 month follow-up (6 months after post-treatment)
|
A 32-item measure, using a 5-point Likert scale, assessing the emotional and cognitive aspects of guilt associated with a specified traumatic event (e.g., combat experience, car accident, physical or sexual abuse, or sudden death of a loved one).
The TRGI has main scales representing guilt, distress and guilt cognitions.
Scores represent the average for items in the scale and range from 0-4, with higher scores representing more guilt/distress.
|
Change from post-treatment (Week 11) to 6 month follow-up (6 months after post-treatment)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shira Maguen, PhD, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 12, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 15, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 3, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
December 4, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 20, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 6, 2025
Last Verified
November 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D2946-R
- I01RX004243 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Moral Injury
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleUniversità Vita-Salute San RaffaeleCompletedHealthy Controls | Moral Development | Moral Dilemma | Moral JustificationItaly
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationMoral Injury SyndromeUnited States
-
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare SystemVA Pittsburgh Healthcare SystemRecruiting
-
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)CompletedGenetic Counseling | Moral Value Conflicts | Moral DistressUnited States
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...UnknownEthical Dilemmas | Ethical Issues | Moral Issues | Moral Dilemmas | Anaesthesiology | AnaesthesiologistNetherlands
-
Mayo ClinicMayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS)Enrolling by invitationWellbeing | Wellness | Moral Injury | Nurse Well-being | Nurse Health | Nurses | Moral Distress | Wellness, Psychological | Post-Traumatic StressUnited States
-
Bilecik Seyh Edebali UniversitesiCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentActive, not recruitingMoral Injury | Functional ImpairmentUnited States
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridEnrolling by invitation
-
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli UniversityCompletedEthics | Moral DistressTurkey
Clinical Trials on Impact of Killing (IOK)
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoUS Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedPosttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)United States
-
Michel DuvalExCellThera inc.; Héma-Québec; Centre C3iNot yet recruitingNeuroblastoma | Leukaemia, Lymphoblastic, Acute | Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation | Leukemia Acute Myeloid - AML | Leukemia Acute Myeloid | Neuroblastoma, Metastatic | Leukemia (Both ALL and AML) | Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplant | Leukaemia (Acute Myeloid) | Leukaemia (Acute Lymphoblastic)Canada
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandUniversity Clermont Auvergne (UCA), Clermont-Ferrand, France; LaPSCO laboratory...RecruitingStress | Heart Rate VariabilityFrance
-
University Hospital, AngersNot yet recruitingDysraphism | Open Dysraphism | Closed Dysraphism
-
Medical University of BialystokCharles University, Czech Republic; University of Liverpool; University of Skopje and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingKidney Diseases | Ischemic Stroke | Atrial Fibrillation | Acute Coronary Syndrome | Oxidative Stress | Pollution; Exposure | Particulate Matter Inhalation InjuryPoland
-
Superior UniversityActive, not recruitingImpact of Delivery Mode on Coccydynia, Pelvic Girdle Pain and Rectus Diastasis in Postpartum FemalesPelvic Girdle Pain | Rectus DiastasisPakistan
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamWithdrawnInflammatory Bowel Diseases
-
Okan UniversityCompleted
-
George Mason UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)WithdrawnSubstance Abuse | HIV Risk | Empathy | Guilt | Shame | Criminogenic ThinkingUnited States