Microwave Ablation Versus Liver Resection For Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Borderline Liver Function

February 9, 2023 updated by: Charing Chong, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
We propose a randomized controlled study to compare the treatment efficacy of microwave ablation to liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with borderline liver function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer and is diagnosed at an earlier stage and with increasing frequency because of the wider implementation of screening programs. Whether liver resection or local ablation should be the first-line treatment in early HCC remains a hot topic for debate. Both are regarded as acceptable curative treatment for early HCC in many international guidelines. Underlying liver function is the key in treatment selection. The general consensus is that liver resection should be the treatment of choice in patients with good liver function while local ablation should be considered in patients with poor liver function. There exists a group of patients with apparently good liver function that harbor significant liver cirrhosis which is not easily picked up by the current assessment or scoring systems. Liver resection in this group of patients is burdened by potentially life-threatening complications and the overall survival is limited by their underlying liver cirrhosis. This is particularly important in early HCC as local ablation is another curative treatment option. In order to improve the prognosis of patients with early HCC, it is important to identify (1) patients with liver dysfunction to the extend that the risk of liver resection will outweigh the survival benefit it provides; (2) the best ablative method for HCC.

The investigators propose to carry out a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the treatment outcome of microwave ablation with liver resection in patients with borderline liver function whose HCC that are amendable to both liver resection and microwave ablation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Charing CN Chong, MBChB

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • HCC amendable for both MWA and liver resection
  • Liver function of ALBI Grade 2
  • Tumour size </= 5cm
  • Absence of extrahepatic metastasis
  • Absence of radiology evidence of major vascular or bile duct invasion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent not available
  • Patients with ALBI 3, Child-Pugh B or above
  • Multifocal tumour
  • Presence of portal vein or hepatic artery thrombosis
  • Anticipation of concomitant procedures
  • Emergency hepatectomy
  • Ruptured HCC
  • Patients with chronic renal failure
  • Pregnant female patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Microwave Ablation
Microwave ablation (MWA) will be performed in patients randomized to this arm.
Microwave ablation will be performed in operation theatre under general anesthesia via laparoscopic or open approach according to the tumors' locations. In case of open approach, it will be done via a right subcostal incision with possible upper midline extension was necessary. After diagnostic laparoscopy in laparoscopic approach and exploratory laparotomy in open approach to exclude the presence of extra-hepatic disease, operative ultrasound (Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) will be performed to exclude preoperatively undetected lesion; guide insertion of the microwave applicator; and monitor the whole ablation process. Surrounding organs were cooled by constant irrigation of ice-cold saline to prevent thermal injury. The ablation will be carried out according to the standard protocol with the aim to create a 1cm ablation margin around the tumor. The insertion track will be burnt after ablation in order to prevent bleeding and tumor seeding.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Liver Resection
Liver resection will be performed in patients randomized to this arm.
Liver resection will be performed as described previously. Liver parenchymal transection would be performed with CUSA (cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator) and TissueLink (a radiofrequency saline-linked dissecting sealer) in both arms. Vascular staplers would be used to divide major vascular pedicles. Fibrin glue (Tisseel) spray would be applied to the parenchymal cut surface of the liver before closure of abdomen.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
The primary outcome of this study is the overall survival
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Disease-free survival
5 years
Morbidity rate
Time Frame: 1 year
Morbidity rate
1 year
Recurrence rate
Time Frame: 5 years
Liver cancer recurrence rate
5 years
Hospital stay
Time Frame: 1 year
Hospital length of stay
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charing CN Chong, MBChB, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 21, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Clinical Trials on Microwave ablation

3
Subscribe