Memantine for Epileptic Encephalopathy

March 10, 2022 updated by: Kenneth Myers, MD

Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial of Memantine Hydrochloride for the Treatment of Childhood-onset Epileptic Encephalopathies

This study will evaluate the potential benefit of memantine hydrochloride as treatment for children with epileptic encephalopathy using a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Memantine, a drug approved for Alzheimer's dementia, exerts its therapeutic effect through its action as a low to moderate affinity non-competitive (open channel) N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) antagonist, which binds preferentially to the NMDA receptor-operated cation channels. It blocks the effects of persistently elevated levels of glutamate that may lead to neuronal dysfunction. Memantine may also have anti-inflammatory effects. Memantine has been used off-label in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, to improve the cognitive impairment.

Epileptic encephalopathy, as well as other forms of epilepsy, may occur as a result of multiple etiologies, including genetic and inflammatory pathologies. Ion channels were long considered to be implicated in genetic epilepsy. Indeed one of the many possible causes of epilepsy is NMDA receptor dysfunction.

In the present study, the investigators plan to investigate the potential benefit of memantine as a treatment for epileptic encephalopathy. A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design will be used, with participants receiving 6 weeks of memantine and 6 weeks of placebo, with a 2-week washout period in between.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
        • Children Hospital - MUHC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent obtained
  • Age 6-18 years (Weight ≥ 20 kg)
  • Clinical diagnosis of epileptic encephalopathy

    • Subject with epilepsy and developmental impairment;
    • Epileptic activity itself contributes to severe cognitive and behavioural impairments
    • Patients will typically have already have trialed at least two standard therapies
  • Females of childbearing age:
  • Negative urinary pregnancy test at screening
  • Agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability of a parent or legal guardian to give informed consent for any reason.
  • Known hypersensitivity to memantine hydrochloride
  • Taking concomitant Amantadine, Ketamine or Dextromethorphan, Cimetidine, Ranitidine, Procainamide, Quinidine, Quinine, Hydrochlorothiazide, Anticholinergics, L-dopa, Anticoagulant,
  • Any degree of renal impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Memantine Hydrochloride 10 mg Placebo

Blue colour capsules, for oral administration, containing 5 mg of active memantine or matching placebo for oral administration.

Dose regimen:

Memantine Hydrochloride

  • Week #1: 5 mg id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #2: 5 mg bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #3-6: 5 mg am & 2x 5 mg pm, 3 caps

Washout (Weeks #7-8)

Placebo

  • Week #9: id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #10: bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #11-14: 1 caps am & 2 caps pm, 3 caps
  • Week #1: 5 mg id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #2: 5 mg bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #3-6: 5 mg am & 2x 5 mg pm, 3 caps
  • Weeks #7-8: Washout

Placebo

  • Week #9: id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #10: bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #11-14: 1 caps am & 2 caps pm, 3 caps

OR Placebo

  • Week #1: id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #2: bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #3-6: 1 caps am & 2 caps pm, 3 caps
  • Weeks #7-8: Washout

Memantine

  • Week #9: 5 mg id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #10: 5 mg bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #11-14: 5 mg am & 2x 5 mg pm, 3 caps
Other Names:
  • PrSANDOZ MEMANTINE FCT10 mg Drug Identification Number (DIN) 02375532
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Memantine Hydrochloride 10 mg

Placebo

  • Week #1: id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #2: bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #3-6: 1 caps am & 2 caps pm, 3 caps

Washout (Weeks #7-8) Memantine Hydrochloride

  • Week #9: 5 mg id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #10: 5 mg bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #11-14: 5 mg am & 2x 5 mg pm, 3 caps
  • Week #1: 5 mg id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #2: 5 mg bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #3-6: 5 mg am & 2x 5 mg pm, 3 caps
  • Weeks #7-8: Washout

Placebo

  • Week #9: id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #10: bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #11-14: 1 caps am & 2 caps pm, 3 caps

OR Placebo

  • Week #1: id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #2: bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #3-6: 1 caps am & 2 caps pm, 3 caps
  • Weeks #7-8: Washout

Memantine

  • Week #9: 5 mg id (am), 1 caps
  • Week #10: 5 mg bid (am and pm), 2 caps
  • Weeks #11-14: 5 mg am & 2x 5 mg pm, 3 caps
Other Names:
  • PrSANDOZ MEMANTINE FCT10 mg Drug Identification Number (DIN) 02375532

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Responder versus Non-Responder Status with Memantine
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14

"Responder" defined as having ≥ 2 of (1) EEG improvement, (2) decreased seizure frequency, (3) cognitive improvement, (4) caregiver impression of improvement, (5) Serum Inflammatory Markers Change. These outcomes are individually defined in detail in the secondary outcomes below.

Description of the primary variable(s) The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite cluster of the first occurrence, over the duration of study (randomization to study end date inclusive), of the EE improvement.

Week 6 or 14
Rate of Responder versus Non-Responder Status with Placebo
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14

"Responder" defined as having ≥ 2 of (1) EEG improvement, (2) decreased seizure frequency, (3) cognitive improvement, (4) caregiver impression of improvement, (5) Serum Inflammatory Markers Change. These outcomes are individually defined in detail in the secondary outcomes below.

Description of the primary variable(s) The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite cluster of the first occurrence, over the duration of study (randomization to study end date inclusive), of the EE improvement.

Week 6 or 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG Change with Memantine
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14

EEG improvement EEG Change: EEG is not a quantitative measure, and there are many possible different patterns that may be seen in epileptic encephalopathy. In general, improvement usually involves (a) background activity changing to more closely resemble the expected background activity for the patient's age, and/or (b) decrease in frequency of epileptiform activity. The electroencephalographer will compare EEGs to the baseline study, and will score as (1) Interval worsening, (2) No significant change, or (3) Interval improvement.

We will be assessing all the frequencies usually assessed on a routine EEG (delta, theta, alpha and beta). The frequency range assessed will be 1-70 Hz.

Week 6 or 14
EEG Change with Placebo
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14

EEG Change: EEG is not a quantitative measure, and there are many possible different patterns that may be seen in epileptic encephalopathy. In general, improvement usually involves (a) background activity changing to more closely resemble the expected background activity for the patient's age, and/or (b) decrease in frequency of epileptiform activity. The electroencephalographer will compare EEGs to the baseline study, and will score as (1) Interval worsening, (2) No significant change, or (3) Interval improvement.

EEG improvement We will be assessing all the frequencies usually assessed on a routine EEG (delta, theta, alpha and beta). The frequency range assessed will be 1-70 Hz.

Week 6 or 14
Seizure Frequency Change with Memantine
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14
Reduction in seizure frequency Seizure Frequency Change: Participants will keep seizure diaries throughout the study. If the frequency of seizures decreases by > 50% from the baseline frequency, they will be classified as having a significant reduction in seizure frequency.
Week 6 or 14
Seizure Frequency Change with Placebo
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14
Reduction in seizure frequency Seizure Frequency Change: Participants will keep seizure diaries throughout the study. If the frequency of seizures decreases by > 50% from the baseline frequency, they will be classified as having a significant reduction in seizure frequency.
Week 6 or 14
Cognitive Function Change with Memantine
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14
Definite improvement in cognitive functioning by neuropsychological testing Cognitive Cognitive Function Change: Participants will see a neuropsychologist at baseline and at the conclusion of each treatment period. The precise testing used will be to the discretion of the neuropsychologist, based on the participant's cognitive capabilities. The neuropsychologist will compare to the baseline assessment and determine if there has been a significant change, based on her experience using these testing protocols in the given age range. The neuropsychologist will score as (1) Interval worsening, (2) No significant change, or (3) Interval improvement.
Week 6 or 14
Cognitive Function Change with Placebo
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14
Definite improvement in cognitive functioning by neuropsychological testing Cognitive Cognitive Function Change: Participants will see a neuropsychologist at baseline and at the conclusion of each treatment period. The precise testing used will be to the discretion of the neuropsychologist, based on the participant's cognitive capabilities. The neuropsychologist will compare to the baseline assessment and determine if there has been a significant change, based on her experience using these testing protocols in the given age range. The neuropsychologist will score as (1) Interval worsening, (2) No significant change, or (3) Interval improvement.
Week 6 or 14
Caregiver Impression of Change with Memantine
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14
Subjective perception of improvement by parents Caregiver Impression of Change: At the conclusion of each treatment period, caregivers will be asked the following question: "Compared to before the study, do you feel the overall functioning of your child (including seizure control, development and quality of life) is (1) Improved, (2) No Change, or (3) Worsened.
Week 6 or 14
Caregiver Impression of Change with Placebo
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14
Subjective perception of improvement by parents Caregiver Impression of Change: At the conclusion of each treatment period, caregivers will be asked the following question: "Compared to before the study, do you feel the overall functioning of your child (including seizure control, development and quality of life) is (1) Improved, (2) No Change, or (3) Worsened.
Week 6 or 14
Serum Inflammatory Markers Change with Memantine
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14
Changes in serum inflammation Serum inflammatory markers: C Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). CRP and ESR are commonly-used clinical measures of inflammation, and IL-6 was found to be elevated in some epileptic encephalopathies in one study (van den Munckhof et al., 2016). Levels will be compared following each treatment period, to the baseline value.
Week 6 or 14
Serum Inflammatory Markers Change with Placebo
Time Frame: Week 6 or 14
Changes in serum inflammation Serum inflammatory markers: C Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). CRP and ESR are commonly-used clinical measures of inflammation, and IL-6 was found to be elevated in some epileptic encephalopathies in one study (van den Munckhof et al., 2016). Levels will be compared following each treatment period, to the baseline value.
Week 6 or 14

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: Week 16
Participants will be asked at all visits to report any possible adverse events, including those requiring emergent treatment. Adverse events will be classified as "clinically significant" or "not clinically significant" with respect to the likelihood that they are related to use of the investigational drug. The frequency of adverse events will be determined during the period receiving memantine and the period receiving placebo.
Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epileptic Encephalopathy, Childhood-Onset

Clinical Trials on Memantine Hydrochloride 10 mg

3
Subscribe