Scaling-up Psychological Interventions With Syrian Refugees in Switzerland (STRENGTHS_CH)

February 3, 2021 updated by: University of Zurich
The current refugee crisis across the Middle East and Europe has large effects on individual refugees' psychological well-being, as well as on the healthcare systems of countries hosting refugees. For example, in Switzerland patients sometimes have to wait up to 12 months for the specific psychological treatment due to a lack of specialists. To address this problem the WHO has developed Problem Management Plus (PM+), a brief (five sessions), low-intensity psychological intervention, delivered by paraprofessionals, that addresses common mental disorders in people in communities affected by adversity. The feasibility of PM+ has never been examined in Switzerland before, this is the aim of the current pilot study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Recent crises in the Middle East, most notably in Syria, have resulted in an unprecedented increase in the worldwide number of refugees and asylum seekers. Switzerland (CH) is strongly affected by this crisis too. Eight percent of asylum requests in 2016 were made by people from Syria (2015: 12 %). More than 7'000 asylum seekers from Syria entered CH over the last two years. Due to the ongoing war in this region, it is unlikely that this kind of migration and flight will stop. Notably, 50% of the refugee population are children and adolescents.

Refugees have typically been exposed to multiple stressors related to war and displacement including loss of family members, destruction of homes and livelihoods and human rights violations such as sexual violence or torture. They have often undertaken a risky and stressful flight leaving their homes for an unknown future. Accordingly, studies consistently show that refugees are at considerable risk of developing common mental disorders, including depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related somatic health symptoms. Recent WHO projections suggest that approximately 15-20% of Syrian refugees will develop some type of mental health problem and therefore represent an enormous public mental health challenge.

According to the UNHCR, 86% of all displaced persons remain in conflict or neighboring countries where appropriate health care is mostly not available. But also Western health systems are often unable to appropriately cover the needs of this particularly vulnerable population regarding prevention and treatment of mental health problems. As a response to this situation, the WHO developed the low-intensity Problem Management Plus (PM+) programs, a new generation of shorter, less expensive and trans-diagnostic (i.e., not specifically aimed at treating a certain mental disorder) programs to reduce common mental health symptoms and improve psychosocial functioning. PM+ is based on the WHO treatment guidelines for conditions related to stress. PM+ is a 5-sessions intervention aimed at reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and related conditions, is delivered by trained non-specialized workers or lay people, and is available in individual and group delivery formats for both children and adults. It comprises evidence-based techniques of (a) problem solving, (b) stress management, (c) behavioral activation, and (d) accessing social support. PM+ has been successfully implemented in Kenya and Pakistan.

The STRENGTHS (Syrian REfuGees MeNTal HealTH Care Systems) study aims at evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of PM+ with Syrian refugees in different settings in low- and high-resource countries. The study consortium includes international experts in the domains of trauma and public mental health as well as representatives of WHO and UNHCR. The Zürich study site has been consigned to examine PM+ with adult refugees in an individual treatment setting in Switzerland. At the same time, similar studies in other countries will be undertaken. Despite the objective of these studies to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of PM+ in refugees, each research institution acts independently. Moreover, the other studies will be completed in different treatment settings - i.e., in children and adolescents (Lebanon), in groups (Turkey and Netherlands), and internet-delivered PM+ (Germany and Egypt).

To date, the feasibility of PM+ has not been investigated in a highly industrialized country, such as Switzerland.

In the present study, the investigators will evaluate the feasibility of PM+ in Syrian refugees in Switzerland.

This research entails single-blind randomized controlled trial.

The amendment was secured by December 2018. Trainers, assessors, supervisors and helpers are already identified, recruited an trained.

After the approval, the first participants will be identified, invited to screening and if they fulfill the criteria they will be invited to participate in the pilot study. The pilot study will end by the end of 2019. After the pilot study the results will be evaluated, analyzed and integrated in the planning of the definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) (next study, not the part of current registration).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • ZH
      • Zürich, ZH, Switzerland, 8006
        • University Hospital Zurich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female Syrian refugees or asylum seekers who entered Switzerland after the beginning of Syrian Civil War in March 2011
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Arabic-speaking
  • Signed Informed Consent after being informed
  • Increased psychological distress (K10 > 15)
  • Reduced psychological functioning (WHODAS 2.0 > 16)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study
  • Previous enrolment into the current study
  • Previous or currently enrolment of a family member into the current study
  • Participants under tutelage
  • Acute or severe psychiatric (e.g. schizophrenia) or neurological illness (e.g. dementia)
  • Imminent suicide risk

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Enhanced Treatment As Usual (ETAU)
The control group will receive enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU). ETAU means that the research team will advise the participants to contact their doctor in case of physical or mental health problems. Moreover, the research team will hand over the list with the general practitioners (GP) in the neighborhood of the participant and the written information (official booklet) about the operating of the Swiss health care system. Adequate treatment will be provided by this physician, usually, a general practitioner who acts as a gate-keeper (an asylum seeker or refugee has to go first to his/her assigned GP in order to get access to the health care system).
Experimental: Problem Management Plus
PM+ is a new, brief, psychological intervention program based on Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) techniques that are empirically supported and formally recommended by the WHO. The full protocol was developed by the WHO and the University of New South Wales, Australia. The manual involves the following empirically supported elements: problem solving plus stress management, behavioural activation, facing fears, and accessing social support. These elements have been recommended in recent WHO guidelines.
PM+ is a new, brief, psychological intervention program based on CBT techniques that are empirically supported and formally recommended by the WHO. The full protocol was developed by the WHO and the University of New South Wales, Australia. The manual involves the following empirically supported elements: problem solving plus stress management, behavioural activation, facing fears, and accessing social support. These elements have been recommended in recent WHO guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verification procedure to the measurement in psychological distress at baseline assessment
Time Frame: baseline assessment (before PM+)
measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25)
baseline assessment (before PM+)
Verification procedure to the measurement in psychological distress after PM+ intervention or ETAU
Time Frame: post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25)
post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Verification procedure to the measurement in psychological distress 3 months after PM+ intervention or ETAU
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25)
3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verification procedure to the measurement of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder at baseline assessment
Time Frame: baseline assessment (before PM+)
measured using the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) (PCL-5)
baseline assessment (before PM+)
Verification procedure to the measurement of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder after PM+ intervention or ETAU
Time Frame: post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
measured using the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) (PCL-5)
post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Verification procedure to the measurement of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder 3 months after PM+ intervention or ETAU
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
measured using the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) (PCL-5)
3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
Verification procedure to the measurement of functional disability at screening
Time Frame: screening (before PM+)
assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)
screening (before PM+)
Verification procedure to the measurement of functional disability after PM+ intervention or ETAU
Time Frame: post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)
post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Verification procedure to the measurement of functional disability 3 months after PM+ intervention or ETAU
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)
3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
Feasibility of PM+ by the number of dropouts
Time Frame: screening (before PM+)
Monitoring of the dropouts by number of patients
screening (before PM+)
Feasibility of PM+ by the number of dropouts
Time Frame: baseline assessment (before PM+)
Monitoring of the dropouts by number of patients
baseline assessment (before PM+)
Feasibility of PM+ by the number of dropouts
Time Frame: post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Monitoring of the dropouts by number of patients
post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Feasibility of PM+ by the number of dropouts
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
Monitoring of the dropouts by number of patients
3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
Feasibility of PM+ by feedbacks regarding the understanding of intervention and measurements instruments
Time Frame: screening (before PM+)
Monitoring of wrong understanding or wrong translation (by number of patients and the scope of the feedback)
screening (before PM+)
Feasibility of PM+ by feedbacks regarding the understanding of intervention and measurements instruments
Time Frame: baseline assessment (before PM+)
Monitoring of wrong understanding or wrong translation (by number of patients and the scope of the feedback)
baseline assessment (before PM+)
Feasibility of PM+ by feedbacks regarding the understanding of intervention and measurements instruments
Time Frame: post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Monitoring of wrong understanding or wrong translation (by number of patients and the scope of the feedback)
post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Feasibility of PM+ by feedbacks regarding the understanding of intervention and measurements instruments
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
Monitoring of wrong understanding or wrong translation (by number of patients and the scope of the feedback)
3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verification procedure to the measurement of change in response to therapy at baseline
Time Frame: baseline assessment (before PM+)
patient-generated outcome measure by the Psychological Outcomes Profiles (PSYCHLOPS) scale [PSYCHLOPS has questions on Problems, Function and Wellbeing. Participants are asked to describe their main Problem or Problems and how this affects them (Function). Responses to all questions are scored [likert-scale 0 to 5 from "severely affected" to "not at all affected"); it is a highly sensitive measure of change during the course of psychotherapeutic interventions.]
baseline assessment (before PM+)
Verification procedure to the measurement of change in response to therapy at post-assessment
Time Frame: post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
patient-generated outcome measure by the Psychological Outcomes Profiles (PSYCHLOPS) scale [PSYCHLOPS has questions on Problems, Function and Wellbeing. Participants are asked to describe their main Problem or Problems and how this affects them (Function). Responses to all questions are scored [likert-scale 0 to 5 from "severely affected" to "not at all affected"); it is a highly sensitive measure of change during the course of psychotherapeutic interventions.]
post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Verification procedure to the measurement of change in response to therapy 3 months after
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
patient-generated outcome measure by the Psychological Outcomes Profiles (PSYCHLOPS) scale [PSYCHLOPS has questions on Problems, Function and Wellbeing. Participants are asked to describe their main Problem or Problems and how this affects them (Function). Responses to all questions are scored [likert-scale 0 to 5 from "severely affected" to "not at all affected"); it is a highly sensitive measure of change during the course of psychotherapeutic interventions.]
3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
Post-migration stressors at baseline
Time Frame: baseline assessment (before PM+)
will be assessed using a version of the Post-Migration Living Difficulties Checklist (PMLDC)
baseline assessment (before PM+)
Post-migration stressors at post-assessment
Time Frame: post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
will be assessed using a version of the Post-Migration Living Difficulties Checklist (PMLDC)
post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Post-migration stressors 3 months after
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
will be assessed using a version of the Post-Migration Living Difficulties Checklist (PMLDC)
3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
Previous exposure to traumatic events
Time Frame: baseline
assessed using the Traumatic Events (TE) - a combination of two standardized questionnaires, namely the Life Events Checklist (LEC) (Weathers et al., 2013) and the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) (Mollica et al., 1992). HTQ consists of 3 sections with 48 questions. LEC consists of 17 question. Single questions from HTQ (Section 1) and LEC are summarized to the sequence of 27 questions (about experienced trauma or adversities with yes/no answer format). The number of positive answers is the outcome value.
baseline
Access to Health Care Services (AHCS)
Time Frame: baseline assessment (before PM+)
The set of question regarding previous contact with the mental health care services and the previous experiences regarding the utilization of any forms of mental support
baseline assessment (before PM+)
Medical service utilization of people with mental disorders at baseline
Time Frame: baseline assessment (before PM+)
accessed using the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) as the basis for calculating the costs of care for mental health cost-effectiveness research
baseline assessment (before PM+)
Medical service utilization of people with mental disorders at post-assessment
Time Frame: post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
accessed using the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) as the basis for calculating the costs of care for mental health cost-effectiveness research
post-assessment baseline (after PM+/ETAU)
Medical service utilization of people with mental disorders at post-assessment 3 months after
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)
accessed using the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) as the basis for calculating the costs of care for mental health cost-effectiveness research
3-months follow-up (after PM+/ETAU)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Naser Morina, PhD, University Hospital Zurich / University of Zurich

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BASEC-2017-01175

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Problem Management Plus

3
Subscribe