Efficacy and Safety of Intraarticular Sodium Hyaluronate Single Injection in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

February 27, 2019 updated by: Tedec-Meiji Farma, S.A.

Prospective, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intraarticular Sodium Hyaluronate Single Injection in Patients Suffering From Osteoarthritis of the Knee

A Phase III, prospective, multicentre, non-controlled, with consecutive participant enrollment in order to evaluate the efficacy, safety and duration of the effects of the viscosupplementation with a preparation of sodium hyaluronate 2% (SH2%) from Tedec-Meiji Farma S.A. over 12 months. Adult patients diagnosed with primary osteoarthritis of the knee according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria with radiological grades II and III according to Kellgren-Lawrence scale (KL) will receive a single injection of SH2% and will be followed for 1 year with follow up visits at 6 and 12 months.

At 6 months patients could be offered a second injection whenever and when they comply with the criteria established for re-treatment and will be followed for additional 6 months

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Prospective, multicentre and non-controlled study. Each patient will receive a single injection of SH 2% and will be followed for 1 year with follow up visits at 6 and 12 months At 6 months follow up visit patients will be offered a second injection whenever and when they comply with the criteria established for re-treatment and will be followed for additional 6 months From the pre-inclusion V0 up to the V1 (beginning of treatment), there will be a wash-out period of 2 weeks during which only paracetamol will be allowed for osteoarthritis (OA) pain relief (maximum dose allowed:3g/day).

Paracetamol will be discontinued at least 24h before follow up visits (Treatment administration, 6 months of follow up and 12 months of follow up).

Clinical evaluation will be done every visits through VAS, WOMAC and Patient's Global Assessment/ Investigator's Global Assessment (PGA/IGA)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

93

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Córdoba, Spain, 10004
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
        • Contact:
          • Miguel A Carcuel, PhD
      • La Coruña, Spain, 15006
        • Recruiting
        • Complejo Hospitalario La Coruña
        • Contact:
          • Francisco J Blanco, PhD
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
        • Contact:
          • Jose L Pablos, PhD
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
        • Contact:
          • Enrique Gómez, PhD
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
        • Contact:
          • Rafael Otero, PhD
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz
        • Contact:
          • Emilio Calvo, PhD
      • Madrid, Spain, 28027
        • Recruiting
        • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
        • Contact:
          • Maria J Cuadrado, PhD
    • Alicánte
      • Elche, Alicánte, Spain, 03203
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital General de Elche
        • Contact:
          • Francisco J Navarro, PhD
      • Villajoyosa, Alicánte, Spain, 03570
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital de la Marina Baixa de Villajoyosa
        • Contact:
          • Jose C Rosas, PhD
    • Madrid
      • Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, 28922
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon
        • Contact:
          • Carlos Gavin, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient ≥ 45 years of age of either sex.
  • Primary knee OA of the medial or lateral femoro-tibial compartment documented according to ACR criteria with symptoms, at screening, from at least 3 months.
  • KL radiological grade 2-3.
  • Antero-posterior view X-Ray image of the target knee
  • Pain intensity at screening in the target knee ≥40 mm and <80 mm measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and ≤ 20 mm in the contralateral knee.
  • Able to understand and willing to comply with study procedures.
  • Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2.
  • Pregnant or lactating women. Women of child-bearing age not using effective contraception.
  • Severe inflammation of the target knee.
  • Previous surgery in the target knee, including arthroscopy.
  • Subjects with any musculoskeletal condition affecting the target knee that would impair the proper evaluation
  • Patients with joint inflammatory disease, microcrystalline arthropathies and significant osteoarthritis symptoms in other joints apart from the knee, and which require pharmacological treatment.
  • Underlying disease considered by the investigator that might interfere with the development and evaluation study.
  • Subjects with venous or lymphatic stasis in the relevant limb.
  • Previous administration of any of the following treatments: hyaluronic acid i.a. (last year); steroids i.a. or joint lavage (last 3 months), glucosamine sulfate, chondroitin sulfate or diacerein (last 3 months), NSAIDs (last 14 days), any investigational drug (last month) or its administration during this study.
  • Pain in other parts of the body greater than the knee pain that could interfere with the evaluation.
  • Any pathology that, under investigator judgement, interfere with the administration or assessment.
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to SH or paracetamol.
  • Patients in waiting list for surgery.
  • Patients awaiting disablement assessment.
  • Previous participation in this protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental: Sodium Hyaluronate 2%
Each patient will receive a single injection of SH2%
Each patient will receive a single injection of SH 2% and will be followed for 6 months. At 6 months follow up visit patients could be offered a second injection whenever and when they comply with the criteria established for re-treatment and will be followed for additional 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain intensity according to VAS (0-100mm)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment
The VAS to be used in the study consists of a horizontal line marked from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 means no pain and 100 is the greatest possible pain. Patients must draw a vertical line at the point that they believe that represents the pain intensity at that time.
6 and 12 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in function from baseline in the target knee
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment
Physical function will be measured by using the function subscale of the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). This index contains 24 items on different activities of daily life grouped in three subscales: pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and functional capacity (17 items). For each item a horizontal visual analogue scale of 0 to 100 mm with end descriptors is used, whose path goes from no pain, no stiffness, no difficulty to extreme pain, extreme stiffness, extreme difficulty.
6 and 12 months after treatment
Change in function from baseline in the target knee
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment
Physical function will be measured by using the function subscale of the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). This subscale contains 24 items on different activities of daily life grouped in three dimensions: pain, stiffness, and functional capacity. For each item a horizontal visual analogue scale of 0 to 100 mm with end descriptors is used, whose path goes from no pain, no stiffness, no difficulty to extreme pain, extreme stiffness, extreme difficulty function subscale
6 and 12 months after treatment
Percentage of patients achieving the Minimally Clinical Important Improvement (MCII)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment
The MCII is the smallest change in measurement that signifies an important improvement in a patient's symptom
6 and 12 months after treatment
Percentage of patients achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment
Defined as the value beyond which patients consider themselves well. According to the literature the recommended value for PASS (measured on 0-100 VAS) is < 40.
6 and 12 months after treatment
Patient and investigator global assessments
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment
Both will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale. This is a five-level classification scale (0= Better, 1 = best, 2 = same, 3 = worst, 4 = much worse)
6 and 12 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mercedes Gimeno, PhD, Tedec Meiji
  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Gavin, PhD, Hospital Uiversitario Fundacion Alcorcón

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 17, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Sodium hyaluronate 2%

3
Subscribe