Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Classic And Lateral Approach Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block

February 3, 2020 updated by: Bahadir Ciftci, Medipol University

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Classic And Lateral Approach Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block For Pain Management Following Lumbar Laminectomy Surgery

US-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and longissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under ultrasound (US) guidance. Therefore, Ahiskalioglu et al. defined modified lateral technique of TLIP block as a new approach. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided classic and modified (lateral) techniques of TLIP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar laminectomy surgery .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Spine surgery in thoracolumbar region is one of the most common surgeries performed for the treatment of leg and back pain 1. Pain management is especially important for these patients since chronic pain often occurs after surgery. Severe pain may occur at postoperative period in patients following lumbar disc herniation (LDH) operation. Postoperative effective pain treatment provides early mobilization and shorter hospital stay, thus complications due to hospitalization such as infection and thromboembolism may be reduced 1,2.

Regional anesthesia techniques may be preferred for postoperative analgesia management.Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a novel ultrasound guided regional analgesia technique.

Several techniques such as intravenous-intramuscular injections, and patient-controlled analgesia devices are usually performed for postoperative pain management. However, these methods may be ineffective in the pain treatment due to they are generally performed after pain has occurred. The analgesic agent may not reach a treatment concentration in the blood due to administrating doses intermittently 2.Opioids are one of the most preferred drugs among the analgesic agents. Parenteral opioids are generally performed for patients after surgery. However opioids have undesirable adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, itching, sedation and respiratory depression (opioid-related adverse events) 3.

Various methods may be performed to reduce the use of systemic opioids and for effective pain treatment. US-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance and defined by Hand et al. in 2015 2. In a retrospective study, it has been reported that this technique can provide effective analgesia after lumbar laminoplasty surgery by Ueshima et al 4. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and longissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under ultrasound (US) guidance. Therefore, Ahiskalioglu et al. defined modified lateral technique of TLIP block as a new approach 5. Ahiskalioglu et al. have reported that this approach has some advantages. Firstly, sonographic visualisation is more easily than the classical technique. Secondly, insertion of the needle from medial to lateral direction reduces the risk of possible neuraxial injection 5.

The aim of this study is to compare US-guided classic and modified (lateral) techniques of TLIP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar laminectomy surgery . The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting) and complications due to blocks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bagcilar
      • Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey, 34070
        • Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
  • scheduled for lumbar laminectomy surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bleeding diathesis
  • receiving anticoagulant treatment
  • known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
  • infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • patients who do not accept the procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Classic block (Group C)
In group C, classic technique will be performed. US probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe will be moved forward to the lateral to visualize the longissimus and multifidus muscles. Between these muscles, block needle will be inserted within in plane technique in a lateral-to-medial direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL will be injected in each side (total 40 mL)
Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) will be performed following induction of general anesthesia, with patients in the prone position by using ultrasound device
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Modified block (Group M)
In group M, modified technique will be performed. US probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe will be moved forward to the lateral to visualize the longissimus and iliocostal muscles. Between these muscles, block needle will be inserted within in plane technique in a medial-to-lateral direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL will be injected in each side (total 40 mL)
Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) will be performed following induction of general anesthesia, with patients in the prone position by using ultrasound device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
opioid consumption
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scores (VAS)
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt).
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Medipol University (Registry Identifier: 10840098-604.01.01-E.10470)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We will not share IPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Trials on Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groups

3
Subscribe