Treat-to-Target Strategy With Etanercept for Ankylosing Spondylitis (T2TEAS)

Treat-to-Target Strategy With Etanercept for Ankylosing Spondylitis: a Prospective, Randomized Multicentric Study on Disease Activity Guided Etanercept Tapering or Discontinuation

Evaluate the disease activity guided tapering and discontinuation strategies of etanercept (ETN) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in 48 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a subset of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by inflammatory back pain and predominant involvement of sacroiliac joints and spine, leading to bony fusion of vertebrae and eventually disability in some patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recognized as a first-line therapy for AS, but the overall response rates to NSAIDs are considerably unsatisfactory. With the advent of biologics, the outcomes of AS patients have been greatly improved. Biologics including tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitors (TNFi) have been included in many recommendations for the treatment of AS. Etanercept, a recombinant human TNFα receptor, is capable of binding to TNFα and blocking its biological activities. It is effective in relieving symptoms, improving physical function, and reducing disease activity in patients with AS, and generally no severe adverse effects have been reported. However, the high expense of biologics restricts their long-term use, which urges a viable strategy to reduce the dosage of biologics while maintaining an optimal therapeutic efficacy. To investigate the stepwise tapering and discontinuation of TNFi based on disease activity in patients with AS, a 48-week, prospective, randomized, multicentric study was conducted. An etanercept biosimilar, rhTNFR:Fc (recombinant TNF receptor: Fc fusion protein, Yisaipu), which is one of the most widely used biosimilars in China, was used in this study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

311

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with AS were recruited in this study. Eligible patients were aged between 18 years old and 65 years old, and were diagnosed with AS according to 1984 revised New York classification criteria. Only patients meet both inclusion and exclusion criteria were included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged between 18 years old and 65 years old with AS, according to 1984-revised New York classification criteria.
  • an active disease of ASDAS with C reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) ≥2.1.
  • a disease duration of 6 months to 30 years.
  • no exposure to biologics in recent 6 months before recruitment. Concomitant medications with NSAIDs, conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), or prednisone or a prednisone equivalent (≤10mg/day), were allowed to continue if they were maintained at a stable dose for 4 weeks or more from baseline.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • late-stage patients with spinal fusion.
  • patients with severe cardiac, hepatic, renal, hematologic or endocrine diseases.
  • patients with a history of multiple sclerosis, current or past malignancy.
  • patients who were pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, or breastfeeding.
  • patients with active or recurrent infections, or those who required oral antibiotics 2 weeks or intravenous antibiotics 4 weeks before screening.
  • patients with current or past or potential tuberculosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
inactive - half dosage tapering
Active AS patients with AS disease activity score (ASDAS)≥2.1 were recruited from ten hospitals, initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients in this arm were those who achieved inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3, group A) at week 12 and assigned to sequential tapering group (A1).
Active AS patients initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients who achieved inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3, group A) at week 12 were either assigned to sequential tapering group (A1) or discontinuation group (A2), and those who reached low disease activity (LDA) (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1, group B) were designated to sequential tapering group (B1), delayed tapering group (B2) or discontinuation group (B3).
Other Names:
  • rhTNFR:Fc, Yisaipu
inactive - discontinuation
Active AS patients with AS disease activity score (ASDAS)≥2.1 were recruited from ten hospitals, initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients in this arm were those who achieved inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3, group A) at week 12 and then assigned to discontinuation group (A2).
Active AS patients initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients who achieved inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3, group A) at week 12 were either assigned to sequential tapering group (A1) or discontinuation group (A2), and those who reached low disease activity (LDA) (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1, group B) were designated to sequential tapering group (B1), delayed tapering group (B2) or discontinuation group (B3).
Other Names:
  • rhTNFR:Fc, Yisaipu
low disease activity - half dosage tapering
Active AS patients with AS disease activity score (ASDAS)≥2.1 were recruited from ten hospitals, initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients in this arm were those who reached low disease activity (LDA) (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1, group B) and designated to sequential tapering group (B1).
Active AS patients initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients who achieved inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3, group A) at week 12 were either assigned to sequential tapering group (A1) or discontinuation group (A2), and those who reached low disease activity (LDA) (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1, group B) were designated to sequential tapering group (B1), delayed tapering group (B2) or discontinuation group (B3).
Other Names:
  • rhTNFR:Fc, Yisaipu
low disease activity - full dosage tapering
Active AS patients with AS disease activity score (ASDAS)≥2.1 were recruited from ten hospitals, initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients in this arm were those who reached low disease activity (LDA) (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1, group B) and designated to delayed tapering group (B2) with extra 12 weeks of full dose ETN.
Active AS patients initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients who achieved inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3, group A) at week 12 were either assigned to sequential tapering group (A1) or discontinuation group (A2), and those who reached low disease activity (LDA) (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1, group B) were designated to sequential tapering group (B1), delayed tapering group (B2) or discontinuation group (B3).
Other Names:
  • rhTNFR:Fc, Yisaipu
low disease activity - discontinuation
Active AS patients with AS disease activity score (ASDAS)≥2.1 were recruited from ten hospitals, initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients in this arm were those who reached low disease activity (LDA) (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1, group B) and designated to discontinuation group (B3).
Active AS patients initially managed with ETN 50mg weekly for 12 weeks, and then randomized into subgroups with different tapering or discontinuation strategies according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients who achieved inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3, group A) at week 12 were either assigned to sequential tapering group (A1) or discontinuation group (A2), and those who reached low disease activity (LDA) (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1, group B) were designated to sequential tapering group (B1), delayed tapering group (B2) or discontinuation group (B3).
Other Names:
  • rhTNFR:Fc, Yisaipu

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative flare rates at week 48 with different tapering or discontinuation strategies
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Cumulative flare rates at week 48 with different tapering or discontinuation strategies
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Clinical Trials on tapering or discontinuation of etanercept

Subscribe