- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03905772
Neuromuscular Adaptations After Training in the Muscle Belly of Triceps Surae
Neuromuscular Adaptations After Training With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Applied Over Nerve Trunk Compared With a Muscle Belly of Triceps Surae: Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
DF
-
Brasília, DF, Brazil, 72220-275
- Faculty of Ceilandia UnB
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Classified as physically active according to the INTERNATIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY,
- To practice only recreational physical activity,
- Achieve minimum torque of 30% of the (maximal voluntary isometric contraction during conventional NMES
- Be at least 3 months without practicing strength training.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Present some type of skeletal muscle dysfunction that may interfere with the tests,
- Present intolerance to NMES in the muscular or tibial nerve, Make use of analgesics, antidepressants, tranquillizers or other agents of central action
- To present cardiovascular or peripheral vascular problems, chronic diseases, neurological or muscular affections that will undermine the complete execution of the study design by the volunteer.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Voluntary exercise
The participants will perform 36 voluntary contractions of 20% of maximal voluntary isometrical contraction, 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
|
The participants will perform 36 maximal voluntary contractions, 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
|
|
Experimental: Wide pulse responder group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks. This group will classified in responder in the acute fase. |
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
This group will be classified in responder group in acute fase.
|
|
Experimental: Wide pulse non responder group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks. This group will classified in non responder in the acute fase. |
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
This group will be classified in non responder group in acute fase.
|
|
Experimental: Pulsed current group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 250 μs, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
|
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 250 μs, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline Central contribution (H reflex) after 15 minutes of acute session of electrical stimulation.
Time Frame: Baseline and after 15 minutes of electrical stimulation in the acute session.
|
Central contribution will be measured before and after 15 minutes (36 contractions) of electrical stimulation in the acute session.
|
Baseline and after 15 minutes of electrical stimulation in the acute session.
|
|
Change from Baseline Central contribution (H reflex) after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation.
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation.
|
Central contribution will be measured before and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation.
|
|
Change from Baseline Peripheral contribution (M wave) after 15 minutes of acute session of electrical stimulation
Time Frame: Baseline and after 15 minutes of electrical stimulation in the acute session
|
Peripheral contribution will be measured before and after acute session 15 minutes (36 contractions) of electrical stimulation in the acute session.
|
Baseline and after 15 minutes of electrical stimulation in the acute session
|
|
Change from Baseline Peripheral contribution (M wave) after 8 weeks of traning with electrical atimulation
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
Peripheral contribution will be measured before and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
|
Change from Baseline Voluntary torque after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
Voluntary torque will be evaluated by an isokinetic dynamometer before and after an 8-week training period with electrical stimulation.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
|
Change from Baseline Electromyographic signals after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
Electromyographic signals will be evaluated by an electromyography before and after an 8-week training period with electrical stimulation.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline Evoked torque after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
Evoked torque will be evaluated by an isokinetic dynamometer before and after an 8-week training period with electrical stimulation.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
|
Change from Baseline Discomfort sensory after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
Discomfort sensory will be evaluated by Visual Analogic Scale before and after an 8-week training period with electrical stimulation.
The Visual Analogic Scale assess pain by rating the subjective perceived disconfort of the subject from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training with electrical stimulation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: João Durigan, PhD, University of Brasilia
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4.
- Dirks ML, Hansen D, Van Assche A, Dendale P, Van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle wasting in critically ill comatose patients. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015 Mar;128(6):357-65. doi: 10.1042/CS20140447.
- Chae J, Sheffler L, Knutson J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):412-26. doi: 10.1310/tsr1505-412.
- Brocherie F, Babault N, Cometti G, Maffiuletti N, Chatard JC. Electrostimulation training effects on the physical performance of ice hockey players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Mar;37(3):455-60. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000155396.51293.9f.
- Billot M, Martin A, Paizis C, Cometti C, Babault N. Effects of an electrostimulation training program on strength, jumping, and kicking capacities in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1407-13. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d43790.
- Medeiros FV, Bottaro M, Vieira A, Lucas TP, Modesto KA, Bo APL, Cipriano G Jr, Babault N, Durigan JLQ. Kilohertz and Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation With the Same Pulse Duration Have Similar Efficiency for Inducing Isometric Knee Extension Torque and Discomfort. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;96(6):388-394. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000631.
- Vaz MA, Baroni BM, Geremia JM, Lanferdini FJ, Mayer A, Arampatzis A, Herzog W. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) reduces structural and functional losses of quadriceps muscle and improves health status in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2013 Apr;31(4):511-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.22264. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
- Gondin J, Brocca L, Bellinzona E, D'Antona G, Maffiuletti NA, Miotti D, Pellegrino MA, Bottinelli R. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training induces atypical adaptations of the human skeletal muscle phenotype: a functional and proteomic analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Feb;110(2):433-50. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00914.2010. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
- Ward AR, Robertson VJ. The variation in fatigue rate with frequency using kHz frequency alternating current. Med Eng Phys. 2000 Nov;22(9):637-46. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(00)00085-0.
- Ward AR, Chuen WL. Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation: part II. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;90(9):1619-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.022.
- Ward AR, Robertson VJ, Ioannou H. The effect of duty cycle and frequency on muscle torque production using kilohertz frequency range alternating current. Med Eng Phys. 2004 Sep;26(7):569-79. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.04.007.
- Paillard T, Noe F, Bernard N, Dupui P, Hazard C. Effects of two types of neuromuscular electrical stimulation training on vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1273-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181739e9c.
- Filipovic A, Kleinoder H, Dormann U, Mester J. Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the influence of training regimens and stimulation parameters on effectiveness in electromyostimulation training of selected strength parameters. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Nov;25(11):3218-38. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e3ce.
- Filipovic A, Kleinoder H, Dormann U, Mester J. Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2600-14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2cd1.
- Selkowitz DM, Rossman EG, Fitzpatrick S. Effect of burst-modulated alternating current carrier frequency on current amplitude required to produce maximally tolerated electrically stimulated quadriceps femoris knee extension torque. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;88(12):973-8. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c1eda5.
- Binder-Macleod SA, Halden EE, Jungles KA. Effects of stimulation intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Apr;27(4):556-65.
- Gorgey AS, Black CD, Elder CP, Dudley GA. Effects of electrical stimulation parameters on fatigue in skeletal muscle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;39(9):684-92. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3045.
- Gorgey AS, Dudley GA. The role of pulse duration and stimulation duration in maximizing the normalized torque during neuromuscular electrical stimulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Aug;38(8):508-16. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2734. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
- Bax L, Staes F, Verhagen A. Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med. 2005;35(3):191-212. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00002.
- Ward AR, Oliver WG, Buccella D. Wrist extensor torque production and discomfort associated with low-frequency and burst-modulated kilohertz-frequency currents. Phys Ther. 2006 Oct;86(10):1360-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050300.
- Laufer Y, Elboim M. Effect of burst frequency and duration of kilohertz-frequency alternating currents and of low-frequency pulsed currents on strength of contraction, muscle fatigue, and perceived discomfort. Phys Ther. 2008 Oct;88(10):1167-76. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080001. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
- Dantas LO, Vieira A, Siqueira AL Jr, Salvini TF, Durigan JL. Comparison between the effects of 4 different electrical stimulation current waveforms on isometric knee extension torque and perceived discomfort in healthy women. Muscle Nerve. 2015 Jan;51(1):76-82. doi: 10.1002/mus.24280.
- Bergquist AJ, Wiest MJ, Collins DF. Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: quadriceps femoris. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Jul;113(1):78-89. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00074.2011. Epub 2012 May 3.
- Maffiuletti NA. Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Sep;110(2):223-34. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y. Epub 2010 May 15.
- Barss TS, Ainsley EN, Claveria-Gonzalez FC, Luu MJ, Miller DJ, Wiest MJ, Collins DF. Utilizing Physiological Principles of Motor Unit Recruitment to Reduce Fatigability of Electrically-Evoked Contractions: A Narrative Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;99(4):779-791. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.478. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
- Gregory CM, Bickel CS. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 2005 Apr;85(4):358-64.
- Bergquist AJ, Clair JM, Collins DF. Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: triceps surae. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Mar;110(3):627-37. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01103.2010. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
- Bergquist AJ, Clair JM, Lagerquist O, Mang CS, Okuma Y, Collins DF. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Oct;111(10):2409-26. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2087-9. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
- da Silva VZ, Durigan JL, Arena R, de Noronha M, Gurney B, Cipriano G Jr. Current evidence demonstrates similar effects of kilohertz-frequency and low-frequency current on quadriceps evoked torque and discomfort in healthy individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(8):533-9. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1064191. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
- Maffiuletti NA, Cometti G, Amiridis IG, Martin A, Pousson M, Chatard JC. The effects of electromyostimulation training and basketball practice on muscle strength and jumping ability. Int J Sports Med. 2000 Aug;21(6):437-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-3837.
- Flann KL, LaStayo PC, McClain DA, Hazel M, Lindstedt SL. Muscle damage and muscle remodeling: no pain, no gain? J Exp Biol. 2011 Feb 15;214(Pt 4):674-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.050112.
- Jenkins NDM, Miramonti AA, Hill EC, Smith CM, Cochrane-Snyman KC, Housh TJ, Cramer JT. Greater Neural Adaptations following High- vs. Low-Load Resistance Training. Front Physiol. 2017 May 29;8:331. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00331. eCollection 2017.
- Oliveira P, Modesto KAG, Bottaro M, Babault N, Durigan JLQ. Training Effects of Alternated and Pulsed Currents on the Quadriceps Muscles of Athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;39(7):535-540. doi: 10.1055/a-0601-6742. Epub 2018 May 22.
- Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Zhou S. Intra- and intermuscular variation in human quadriceps femoris architecture assessed in vivo. J Anat. 2006 Sep;209(3):289-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00619.x.
- Morse CI, Thom JM, Birch KM, Narici MV. Changes in triceps surae muscle architecture with sarcopenia. Acta Physiol Scand. 2005 Mar;183(3):291-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01404.x.
- Grospretre S, Jacquet T, Lebon F, Papaxanthis C, Martin A. Neural mechanisms of strength increase after one-week motor imagery training. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Mar;18(2):209-218. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1415377. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
- Duclay J, Martin A. Evoked H-reflex and V-wave responses during maximal isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle contraction. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):3555-62. doi: 10.1152/jn.00348.2005. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
- Babault N, Pousson M, Michaut A, Van Hoecke J. Effect of quadriceps femoris muscle length on neural activation during isometric and concentric contractions. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Mar;94(3):983-90. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2002. Epub 2002 Nov 15.
- Kent-Braun JA. Central and peripheral contributions to muscle fatigue in humans during sustained maximal effort. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999 Jun;80(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s004210050558.
- Pajoutan M, Ghesmaty Sangachin M, Cavuoto LA. Central and peripheral fatigue development in the shoulder muscle with obesity during an isometric endurance task. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1676-0.
- Botter A, Oprandi G, Lanfranco F, Allasia S, Maffiuletti NA, Minetto MA. Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Oct;111(10):2461-71. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2093-y. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 01326818.8.0000.8093
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Electrical Stimulation
-
University of BrasiliaUniversity of BurgundyCompletedElectrical StimulationBrazil
-
Biruni UniversityRecruitingNeuromuscular Electrical StimulationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaCompletedElectrical Stimulation | NeuromodulationSpain
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalCompletedTranscranial Electrical Stimulation
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaCompleted
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleCompleted
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaCompletedElectrical Stimulation | NeuromodulationSpain
-
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityRecruitingTranscutaneous Electrical Acupoint StimulationChina
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedTranscranial Electrical Stimulation (tES)United States
-
Seoul National University HospitalNational Research Foundation of KoreaCompletedElectrical Stimulation | Phrenic NerveKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on Voluntary exercise
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompletedParkinson's DiseaseUnited States
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompletedMultiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NCMRR)UnknownOsteoarthritis | Total Knee ArthroplastyUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCompletedMuscle Fiber Atrophy, Type IIUnited States
-
Université de SherbrookeUnknownExercise Induced BronchospasmCanada
-
Jay AlbertsCompletedParkinson Disease | Deep Brain StimulationUnited States
-
The Cleveland ClinicUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
Federal University of UberlandiaCompletedStress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)Brazil
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Centro Universitario La SalleRecruitingPain | Apnea | Hypoxia | HypercapniaSpain