Transcutaneous Repetitive Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Healthy Adults

March 9, 2024 updated by: Sung Eun Hyun, Seoul National University Hospital

The goal of this observational study is to characterize the standardized stimulation parameter for noninvasive, transcutaneous, repetitive phrenic nerve electrical stimulation.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the phrenic nerve repetitive electrical stimulation test feasible for use as non-invasive transcutaneous electrical stimulation?
  • What is the most optimal stimulation parameters for repetitive phrenic nerve electrical stimulation in healthy adult populations in terms of effective and safe activation of diaphragm?

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Sung Eun Hyun, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +82-2-2072-1529
  • Email: sechyun@snu.ac.kr

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy adult population who have read the recruitment announcement, voluntarily expressed their intention to participate, and have met the eligibility criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Koreans who speak Korean as their mother tongue, aged 19 or older and younger than 40.
  • Those who understood the purpose and procedure of this study and voluntarily participated with consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. - Those who have any neuromuscular disease.

    - Those whom abnormal findings are observed on a neurological examination. e.g.) Cases with abnormal findings in peripheral motor nerve (median nerve) and sensory nerve (sural nerve) conduction studies performed in screening.

    e.g.) People who have been diagnosed with a neuromuscular junctional diseases such as myasthenia gravis or receiving related treatment.

  2. In the case of implantable electronic medical devices such as pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and spinal cord stimulation devices.
  3. Those who have any history of radiation therapy or chemotherapy for cancer within a year.
  4. People who have a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease or lung disease within 6 months.
  5. Those who have been diagnosed with a psychiatric/neurological problem or taking related medications that may affect electrophysiological study.
  6. Those who are pregnant or may be pregnant.
  7. Those who are judged to lack the cognitive ability to understand the explanation of the purpose and procedure of this study.
  8. Those whom the researchers judge for other reasons to be inappropriate to participate in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phrenic nerve compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude (mV)
Time Frame: Baseline
∙ CMAP Amplitude (mV)
Baseline
∙ Phrenic nerve compound muscle action potential (CMAP) duration (ms)
Time Frame: Baseline
∙ CMAP duration (ms)
Baseline
∙ Phrenic nerve compound muscle action potential (CMAP) area (mV∙ms)
Time Frame: Baseline
∙ CMAP area (mV∙ms)
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory function
Time Frame: Baseline
∙ Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP)
Baseline
Diaphragmatic function
Time Frame: Baseline
∙ Baseline diaphragm thickness
Baseline
Diaphragmatic function
Time Frame: Baseline
∙ Diaphragm thickening fraction percent: the difference between diaphragm thickness at the end of inspiration (DTi) and at the end of expiration (DTe) divided by DTe × 100
Baseline
Pain during phrenic stimulation
Time Frame: Baseline
∙ Numeric rating scale (range: 0~10): This scale ranges from 0 to 10 points, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sung Eun Hyun, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022R1F1A1071488

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Electrical Stimulation

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous, repetitive phrenic nerve electrical stimulation

3
Subscribe