RIvoraxaban in Mitral Stenosis (RISE MS)

RIvoraxaban Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Mitral Stenosis

In this randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis (MS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) will be enrolled into the study.Participants will be divided into two groups based on the anticoagulation regimen type. The intervention group will receive rivaroxaban and the control group will be given warfarin. All patients will be observed closely during a period of one year. Through the follow up, embolic events and hemorrhagic complications will be recorded in both groups. In addition, patients in both group will undergo a baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and an MRI after one-year follow up, by which the silent embolic events will be compared in both groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study rationale:

Since the introduction of warfarin as the main oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with MS and AF, no other drug has been replaced/suggested by any medical community for this group of patients. Warfarin is considered a drug with marginal therapeutic effect, with a need for constant monitoring, with lots of known drug interaction and finally a great probability of adverse complication. Novel oral anticoagulation agents have resolved several of these drawbacks and has been recommended as a viable option as a substitute of warfarin in various clinical scenario. Until now, no trial has evaluated the potentiality of using novel oral anticoagulations (NOACs) in patients with MS accompanied by AF. In this trial investigators are intended to elaborate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with MS complicated by AF

Background:

Since the introduction of NOAC, their indication has been expanded in various type of diseases. From protecting against ischemic stroke in AF patients to treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, NOAC were both safe and effective compared to warfarin. Importantly this new class of drug have omitted some of the major drawbacks of warfarin; their predictable therapeutic level has permitted to prescribed them as fixed dosage without constant laboratory tests. Also their shorter half-life has made critical situation in which reversal of anticoagulation agents were needed, more manageable.

There are solid evidences that AF is one of the major cause of cerebrovascular ischemic events, and anticoagulation therapy by decreasing thrombus formation reduces significantly these major adverse events. So there is no wonder that first studies on NOAC were performed on AF population. In the beginning AF caused by valvular heart diseases were judge to bear a much greater risk as cerebrovascular events are concerns, and consequently patients with valvular pathologies were eliminated from the earlier pivotal studies. However, through these years, there are lots of evidences showing the safety and efficacy of NOAC in valvular pathologies. Recently ENGAGE TIMI 48 Trial has showed the efficacy and safety of Edoxaban in patients with valvular heart diseases. By testing the theory in a large population, the ENGAGE TIMI 48 study emphasized on a greater risk of embolic events in patients with VHD and AF, but this increasing risk has no effect on the efficacy of edoxaban compared to warfarin. Interestingly the new agents had less major bleeding compared to warfarin.

But still in all these trials, moderate to severe MS and mechanical prosthetic valves were omitted from the studied population. The rationale behind this omission was the significant higher risk of thrombosis in the two mentioned subgroups. However, investigators have several hypotheses that patients with MS are different from patients undergoing mechanical prosthetic valve replacement:

  • Although there is a higher risk of thromboembolic events in MS comparing to other valvular heart diseases, this has not resulted in increasing the magnitude of protection with warfarin; the recommended levels of international normalized ratio (INR) in MS population is 2-3 as other pathologies.
  • Apart from patients with mechanical prosthesis implanted in mitral valve position, there is no other subgroup of patients whom higher INR and level of anticoagulation with warfarin proved to be more efficacious.

In conclusion, investigators think that the MS population might be a good target for NOAC and as other valvular heart disease, they could benefit from the advantages of these drugs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. Men and women ≥ 18 year-old
  4. Diagnosed with moderate to severe mitral stenosis who have a history of AF of any duration documented by any electrical tracing within the prior 12 months and for which anticoagulation is indicated and planned for the duration of the study.
  5. Ability to take oral medication and be willing to adhere to the rivaroxaban regimen

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Left atrial clot
  2. Severe renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance [CrCl] <15 mL/min), subjects with
  3. A condition associated with a high risk of bleeding
  4. Allergic to rivaroxabn/warfarin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban will be used as the anticoagulation drug for the intervention group. Rivaroxaban is an anticoagulant and the first orally active direct factor Xa inhibitor. Unlike warfarin, routine lab monitoring of INR is not necessary. However there is no approved antidote available in the event of a major bleed. Only the 10 mg tablet can be taken without regard to food. The 15 mg and 20 mg tablet should be taken with food.
Rivaroxaban will be used as the anticoagulation drug for the intervention group. Rivaroxaban is an anticoagulant and the first orally active direct factor Xa inhibitor. Unlike warfarin, routine lab monitoring of INR is not necessary. However there is no approved antidote available in the event of a major bleed. Only the 10 mg tablet can be taken without regard to food. The 15 mg and 20 mg tablet should be taken with food
Active Comparator: Warfarin
Warfarin will be used as the anticoagulation drug for the control group. Warfarin decreases blood clotting by blocking an enzyme called vitamin K epoxide reductase that reactivates vitamin K1. Without sufficient active vitamin K1, clotting factors II, VII, IX, and X have decreased clotting ability. The anticlotting protein C and protein S are also inhibited but to a lesser degree. A few days are required for full effect to occur and these effects can last for up to five days, and the final dose will be adjusted according to PT and related INR.
Warfarin will be used as the anticoagulation drug for the control group. Warfarin decreases blood clotting by blocking an enzyme called vitamin K epoxide reductase that reactivates vitamin K1. Without sufficient active vitamin K1, clotting factors II, VII, IX, and X have decreased clotting ability. The anticlotting protein C and protein S are also inhibited but to a lesser degree. A few days are required for full effect to occur and these effects can last for up to five days, and the final dose will be adjusted according to PT and related INR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with stroke
Time Frame: 12 months
A stroke is defined as an abrupt onset, over minutes to hours, of a focal neurological deficit in the distribution of a single brain artery that is not due to an identifiable nonvascular cause (i.e., brain tumor or trauma), and that either lasts at least 24 hours or results in death within 24 hours of onset.
12 months
Number of participants with systemic embolic event
Time Frame: 12 months
An SEE is defined as an arterial embolism resulting in clinical ischemia, excluding the central nervous system (CNS), coronary and pulmonary arterial circulation.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with bleeding complications
Time Frame: 12 months
Bleeding complication will be assessed according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Majid Maleki, M.D., Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 14, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Rivaroxaban

3
Subscribe