- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03938090
Optimised MultiSite Pacing Vector Study
Multimodality Assessment of Acute and Long Term Response to Optimised MultiSite Pacing Cardiac Resynchronisation (MSP CRT) Devices Compared to Biventricular (BiV) CRT, in Patients With Heart Failure
The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the clinical benefits of an MultiSite pacing (MSP) with patient specific left ventricular vector optimization in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after 6 months of therapy.
This clinical investigation is a single-center, prospective, two-arm, randomized 1:1, crossover study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Optimized MSP CRT compared to conventional bi-ventricular pacing.
Data will be collected at enrolment, CRT implant procedure, hospital pre-discharge, one, three and six months post implant. Enrolment data collection will include demographics, cardiovascular history, medication, echocardiography measurements, heart failure quality of life questionnaire and six minute walk test distance.
CRT implant procedure data collection will include implanted system information, lead location and conduction times. The electrical conduction recording procedure will include surface ECG and device electrogram (EGM) recordings during various MSP vector pacing configurations at the time of CRT device implant.
Patients will also undergo simultaneous invasive pressure measurements using a left ventricular pressure wire to allow haemodynamic measurements (dP/dtmax) during various MSP vector pacing configurations.
Optimal MSP programming settings will be determined by the narrowest QRS duration recorded by 12 lead ECG and the greatest change in dP/dtmax by pressure wires study.
In a subgroup of patients (approximately 25 patients), non-invasive electrical activation data will be collected with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) within 45 days of the implant procedure.
Patients will then be randomized 1:1 to receive either standard biventricular pacing or Optimized MSP at their one-month follow-up (± 15 days) visit.
At the 3 months (± 15 days) post randomization follow up visit, data collection will include surface ECG, EGMs, echocardiographic parameters and quality of life questionnaire. The patients will then undergo cross-over to the alternate randomization group with programming adjusted accordingly.
At the final, 6 months (± 15 days) post randomization follow-up visit, data collection will include surface ECG, EGMs, echocardiographic parameters and quality of life questionnaire. This will mark the completion of the study for each patient.
The expected duration of enrolment is 18 months. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 25 months.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Peter H Waddingham, MBBS BSc
- Phone Number: 02037658635
- Email: p.waddingham@nhs.net
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Victoria Baker, BA
- Phone Number: 02037658635
- Email: victoria.baker@bartshealth.nhs.uk
Study Locations
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, EC1A 7BE
- St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust
-
Contact:
- Peter H Waddingham, MBBS BSc
- Phone Number: 02037658635
- Email: p.waddingham@nhs.net
-
Contact:
- Victoria Baker, BA
- Phone Number: 02037658635
- Email: victoria.baker@bartshealth.nhs.uk
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Peter H Waddingham, MBBS BSc
-
Principal Investigator:
- Anthony WC Chow, MBBS BSc MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic Heart Failure (NYHA class I-IV) with QRS duration of 150ms or more with left bundle branch block and LVEF of 35% or less despite optimal medical therapy.
- Patients above 18 years of age
- Able to provide informed consent and willing to comply with study requirements
- Intrinsic QRS duration ≥ 150 ms
- Sinus (or atrial paced) rhythm with intact AV conduction (PR interval ≤250 ms)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Resting heart rate > 100 bpm
- High degree AV Block (2nd or 3rd degree AV block)
- Documented persistent atrial arrhythmia at the moment of enrolment or patients not likely to remain in sinus (or atrial paced) rhythm for the duration of the study
- Patients scheduled for AV node ablation to treat atrial arrhythmias
- Recent (< 3 months) myocardial infarction, catheter ablation, electrolyte imbalance, or any condition within the last 90 days that would contraindicate CRT programming changes in the opinion of the investigator
- Women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study course
- Known left ventricular thrombus
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Standard biventricular pacing
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices will be programmed as per standard biventricular pacing settings
|
Conventional programming settings using biventricular pacing will be used
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Optimised MultiSite Pacing (MSP)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices will be programmed as per optimal MSP programming settings; determined by greatest change in dP/dtmax and narrowest QRS duration.
|
The intervention includes using optimal programming settings with MultiSite pacing configurations via the patient's CRT device.
The device in use is the same for each arm, the only changes are the programming settings.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Echocardiographic clinical response
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post randomization
|
Response to optimised MSP CRT compared to BiV CRT defined by LV systolic volume reduction of greater than 15% (indicative of "reverse remodelling") at completion of follow up.
|
3 and 6 months post randomization
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Acute changes in surface ECG QRS duration and morphology
Time Frame: Acute change in QRS duration with pacing compared to intrinsic QRS duration, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
|
QRS duration changes with CRT programming optimisation
|
Acute change in QRS duration with pacing compared to intrinsic QRS duration, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
|
Acute change in LV dP/dtmax
Time Frame: Acute change in LV dP/dtmax with pacing compared to intrinsic rhythm, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
|
Changes in LV contractility as assessed by pressure wire
|
Acute change in LV dP/dtmax with pacing compared to intrinsic rhythm, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
|
Change in exercise capacity by 6MWT distance
Time Frame: Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
|
6 minute walk test distance
|
Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
|
Change in NYHA functional class
Time Frame: Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
|
New York Heart Association Functional class
|
Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sub-group outcome: assessment of LV activation timings with ECGi
Time Frame: 1 month post implant
|
Electrocardiographic imaging
|
1 month post implant
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anthony WC Chow, MBBS BSc MD, Study Chief Investigator
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 012604
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart Failure Stage CFrance
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Lancaster General HospitalLouise von Hess Medical Research InstituteEnrolling by invitationDiastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Giresun UniversityIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)RecruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureTurkey
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Duke University; St. Paul's Hospital... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingHeart Diseases | Heart Failure | Transplant; Failure, Heart | Heart Transplant Failure and Rejection | Heart Failure,Congestive | Transplant FailureCanada, United States
Clinical Trials on Standard biventricular pacing
-
Cardiff and Vale University Health BoardCompleted
-
MicroPort CRMCompletedHeart FailureSpain, France, Portugal, Netherlands, Germany, Italy
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedVentricular Dysfunction | Atrioventricular BlockGermany
-
Indiana UniversitySuspended
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaActive, not recruitingResynchronization Therapy | Conduction System PacingSpain
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University; Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHeart Failure | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy | Right Ventricular Pacing | Biventricular Pacing | Conduction System PacingChina
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenCompletedCongenital Heart Disease (CHD)Canada
-
Hospital Moinhos de VentoMinistry of Health, BrazilActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Left Bundle-Branch Block | Cardiac Resynchronization | Conduction System PacingBrazil
-
Henry M. SpotnitzNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)TerminatedDilated Cardiomyopathy | Ischemic CardiomyopathyUnited States