Optimised MultiSite Pacing Vector Study

May 13, 2019 updated by: Barts & The London NHS Trust

Multimodality Assessment of Acute and Long Term Response to Optimised MultiSite Pacing Cardiac Resynchronisation (MSP CRT) Devices Compared to Biventricular (BiV) CRT, in Patients With Heart Failure

The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the clinical benefits of an MultiSite pacing (MSP) with patient specific left ventricular vector optimization in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after 6 months of therapy.

This clinical investigation is a single-center, prospective, two-arm, randomized 1:1, crossover study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Optimized MSP CRT compared to conventional bi-ventricular pacing.

Data will be collected at enrolment, CRT implant procedure, hospital pre-discharge, one, three and six months post implant. Enrolment data collection will include demographics, cardiovascular history, medication, echocardiography measurements, heart failure quality of life questionnaire and six minute walk test distance.

CRT implant procedure data collection will include implanted system information, lead location and conduction times. The electrical conduction recording procedure will include surface ECG and device electrogram (EGM) recordings during various MSP vector pacing configurations at the time of CRT device implant.

Patients will also undergo simultaneous invasive pressure measurements using a left ventricular pressure wire to allow haemodynamic measurements (dP/dtmax) during various MSP vector pacing configurations.

Optimal MSP programming settings will be determined by the narrowest QRS duration recorded by 12 lead ECG and the greatest change in dP/dtmax by pressure wires study.

In a subgroup of patients (approximately 25 patients), non-invasive electrical activation data will be collected with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) within 45 days of the implant procedure.

Patients will then be randomized 1:1 to receive either standard biventricular pacing or Optimized MSP at their one-month follow-up (± 15 days) visit.

At the 3 months (± 15 days) post randomization follow up visit, data collection will include surface ECG, EGMs, echocardiographic parameters and quality of life questionnaire. The patients will then undergo cross-over to the alternate randomization group with programming adjusted accordingly.

At the final, 6 months (± 15 days) post randomization follow-up visit, data collection will include surface ECG, EGMs, echocardiographic parameters and quality of life questionnaire. This will mark the completion of the study for each patient.

The expected duration of enrolment is 18 months. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 25 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, EC1A 7BE
        • St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Peter H Waddingham, MBBS BSc
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anthony WC Chow, MBBS BSc MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic Heart Failure (NYHA class I-IV) with QRS duration of 150ms or more with left bundle branch block and LVEF of 35% or less despite optimal medical therapy.
  • Patients above 18 years of age
  • Able to provide informed consent and willing to comply with study requirements
  • Intrinsic QRS duration ≥ 150 ms
  • Sinus (or atrial paced) rhythm with intact AV conduction (PR interval ≤250 ms)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Resting heart rate > 100 bpm
  • High degree AV Block (2nd or 3rd degree AV block)
  • Documented persistent atrial arrhythmia at the moment of enrolment or patients not likely to remain in sinus (or atrial paced) rhythm for the duration of the study
  • Patients scheduled for AV node ablation to treat atrial arrhythmias
  • Recent (< 3 months) myocardial infarction, catheter ablation, electrolyte imbalance, or any condition within the last 90 days that would contraindicate CRT programming changes in the opinion of the investigator
  • Women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study course
  • Known left ventricular thrombus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Standard biventricular pacing
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices will be programmed as per standard biventricular pacing settings
Conventional programming settings using biventricular pacing will be used
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Optimised MultiSite Pacing (MSP)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices will be programmed as per optimal MSP programming settings; determined by greatest change in dP/dtmax and narrowest QRS duration.
The intervention includes using optimal programming settings with MultiSite pacing configurations via the patient's CRT device. The device in use is the same for each arm, the only changes are the programming settings.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Echocardiographic clinical response
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post randomization
Response to optimised MSP CRT compared to BiV CRT defined by LV systolic volume reduction of greater than 15% (indicative of "reverse remodelling") at completion of follow up.
3 and 6 months post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute changes in surface ECG QRS duration and morphology
Time Frame: Acute change in QRS duration with pacing compared to intrinsic QRS duration, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
QRS duration changes with CRT programming optimisation
Acute change in QRS duration with pacing compared to intrinsic QRS duration, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
Acute change in LV dP/dtmax
Time Frame: Acute change in LV dP/dtmax with pacing compared to intrinsic rhythm, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
Changes in LV contractility as assessed by pressure wire
Acute change in LV dP/dtmax with pacing compared to intrinsic rhythm, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
Change in exercise capacity by 6MWT distance
Time Frame: Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
6 minute walk test distance
Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
Change in NYHA functional class
Time Frame: Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
New York Heart Association Functional class
Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sub-group outcome: assessment of LV activation timings with ECGi
Time Frame: 1 month post implant
Electrocardiographic imaging
1 month post implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anthony WC Chow, MBBS BSc MD, Study Chief Investigator

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No participant data will be shared with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Standard biventricular pacing

3
Subscribe